How ya think the soldiers of the new Muslim boss are treating the wife of the old “ch

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Pro Muslim Obama supported and has congratulated Quattara.

With rare exception, America media will not post the pic of Gbagbo's wife surrounded by Muslim Quattara’s gloating soldiers.

To their credit New Yorker mag , msnbc and some foreign sites posted it.

ps: Can you imagine the furor/outrage that would result if the soldiers were white ?

But since they are black and work for the man Obama helped install, to most media, it's NO BIG DEAL.

Identity politics is morally perverted.

 
Last edited:
Which wife are talking about now? His Christian wife or his other Muslim wife? LMFAO @ bible humpers capin for a guy with 2 wives.
 
Last edited:
John Prewett;2384403 said:
Pro Muslim Obama supported and has congratulated Quattara.

With rare exception, America media will not post the pic of Gbagbo's wife surrounded by Muslim Quattara’s gloating soldiers.

To their credit New Yorker mag , msnbc and some foreign sites posted it.

ps: Can you imagine the furor/outrage that would result if the soldiers were white ?

But since they are black and work for the man Obama helped install, to most media, it's NO BIG DEAL.

Identity politics is morally perverted.


are u tryna say black ppl are jus as vile as white ppl mr prewettt??? why did u even bring up race in this???

one last question, where do u think they got this idea from???? to embarass the opposition?? from who?
 
Last edited:
shootemwon;2384950 said:
Which wife are talking about now? His Christian wife or his other Muslim wife? LMFAO @ bible humpers capin for a guy with 2 wives.

The wife in the pic is his "Christian" wife. Would it make any difference ? Gbagbo was no "saint". But Islam is raw EVIL.

Raw EVIL is what Obama and the French and the UN have caused to prevail.
 
Last edited:
zoepian;2385754 said:
are u tryna say black ppl are jus as vile as white ppl mr prewettt???

"Trying" ? I assert whites and blacks are intrinsicly morally [or immorally if you prefer] equal.

But CULTures are NOT morally equal.

zoepian;2385754 said:
why did u even bring up race in this???

I assert that rape is EQUALLY wicked crime NO MATTER the color of perp and victim.

Whereas modern Political Correctness/liberal/feminist/black power ideology considers white rapist to be worse than black rapist.

zoepian;2385754 said:
one last question, where do u think they got this idea from???? to embarass the opposition?? from who?

I think this pic reflects ISLAMIC cult mentality mixed with basic evil low life mentality.

Mohammed himself killed men and raped the widow the same day.

The new Muslim boss is sending the word especially to any Ivory Coast opposition:

"I'll do same to your wife if you oppose me"
 
Last edited:
John Prewett;2392821 said:
"Trying" ? I assert whites and blacks are intrinsicly morally [or immorally if you prefer] equal.

But CULTures are NOT morally equal.

I assert that rape is EQUALLY wicked crime NO MATTER the color of perp and victim.

Whereas modern Political Correctness/liberal/feminist/black power ideology considers white rapist to be worse than black rapist.

I think this pic reflects ISLAMIC cult mentality mixed with basic evil low life mentality.

Mohammed himself killed men and raped the widow the same day.

The new Muslim boss is sending the word especially to any Ivory Coast opposition:

"I'll do same to your wife if you oppose me"

LOL, at a White Christian male talking about raping and killing in the same day.

Some crackers got more nerve than a toothache. I guess the he doesn't know that a lot of the opposition were mercenary Christians from neighboring countries. Hence the fucked up makeshift uniforms. This is not about religion you dumb cracker. Gbagbo wouldn't yield to French Pressure to siphon off the resources like Cocoa for nothing like his predecessors. He wouldn't allow the French companies to not pay taxes anymore, and he would not allow Frenchmen to have cabinet positions anymore.

You idiot it is Christian France that is backing Allasane.

Never mind the massive voter fraud, that the High court ruled on and threw out many votes and declared Gbagbo the winner(Sound familiar). Gbagbo made a mistake in conceding the right for Allasane to run because it is a violation of the Ivorian constitution. Alasane did not meet the citizen requirements. He should have known something was up. Allasane had been in bed with the French for decades. They had been pushing for him since the 90's. They want to reverse the progress toward independence the Ivorians were making which meant France would have to pimp somewhere else.

I have friends in Coit Ivoire that know the real story. Your plagiarized, western media view is horse caca.

Allasane will not be successful because the French will get rid of him and place someone else there they can trust.
 
Last edited:
John Prewett;2392821 said:
I think this pic reflects ISLAMIC cult mentality mixed with basic evil low life mentality.

Thinks back to the Gitmo Bay photos...hmmm...right. Yeah the photo is f'd up, but let's not act like Christianity is free from despicable acts.

Also, I couldn't help but to notice you are promoting http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/quran/index.htm in your sig...but not promoting http://skepticsannotatedbible.com. I assume if you accept the one about the quran, then you should also appreciate the author's critique of the bible.
 
Last edited:
And Step;2399248 said:
I have friends in Coit Ivoire that know the real story. Your plagiarized, western media view is horse caca.
as always, though, this type of statement alone remains meaningless on the internet

also, you're debating someone whose entire argument is "Muslims are evil"
 
Last edited:
janklow;2402462 said:
as always, though, this type of statement alone remains meaningless on the internet

also, you're debating someone whose entire argument is "Muslims are evil"

The truth is never meaningless. It may not be valued, but it is always meaningful.

And no, I was pointing out the wackness and contradictory stance of his argument when it is Christians who are backing the "evil" Muslim.
 
Last edited:
And Step;2402753 said:
The truth is never meaningless. It may not be valued, but it is always meaningful.
except that you're missing the key part of the statement: "meaningless on the internet." when you say, "oh, my argument is supported by people i know," it doesn't add anything to your argument except a claim that your position cannot be wrong because of an unverifiable statement. someone espousing the opposite position can literally make the same argument.

And Step;2402753 said:
And no, I was pointing out the wackness and contradictory stance of his argument when it is Christians who are backing the "evil" Muslim.
what i'm saying is that it doesn't manner if you point out a logical problem with his argument, since if he's arguing "Muslims are evil" and nothing much more, he's not going to be able to appreciate your point.
 
Last edited:
janklow;2407857 said:
except that you're missing the key part of the statement: "meaningless on the internet." when you say, "oh, my argument is supported by people i know," it doesn't add anything to your argument except a claim that your position cannot be wrong because of an unverifiable statement. someone espousing the opposite position can literally make the same argument.

That is a bullshit argument and it's irrelevant. That's not my problem or concern. I never said my statement can't be wrong. Quit advancing arguments I never made.
Truth doesn't need to verified, It stands on it's own whether you or I accept it or not regardless to "verification". But I am right, anyway.

what i'm saying is that it doesn't manner if you point out a logical problem with his argument, since if he's arguing "Muslims are evil" and nothing much more, he's not going to be able to appreciate your point.

Oh so you are his official spokesman now? You're playing thought police? LOL. FOH, Janklow, your too smart for your own good. LOL
 
Last edited:
And Step;2399248 said:
............. a lot of the opposition were mercenary Christians from neighboring countries.

NONE of the soldiers were followers of CHRIST. Therefore it is NOT accurate to label them "CHRISTian"

And Step;2399248 said:
This is not about religion you dumb cracker...

To SOME of the participants it IS about religion you dumb bigot

And Step;2399248 said:
Gbagbo wouldn't yield to French Pressure to siphon off the resources like Cocoa for nothing like his predecessors.

He wouldn't allow the French companies to not pay taxes anymore, and he would not allow Frenchmen to have cabinet positions anymore.

Now you are providing some plausible information. Thank you.

And Step;2399248 said:
You idiot it is Christian France that is backing Allasane.

NONidiots know that NO temporal nation is following CHRIST therefore NO temporal nation should be labeled "CHRISTian"

And Step;2399248 said:
Never mind the massive voter fraud, that the High court ruled on and threw out many votes and declared Gbagbo the winner (Sound familiar). Gbagbo made a mistake in conceding the right for Allasane to run because it is a violation of the Ivorian constitution. Alasane did not meet the citizen requirements. He should have known something was up. Allasane had been in bed with the French for decades. They had been pushing for him since the 90's. They want to reverse the progress toward independence the Ivorians were making which meant France would have to pimp somewhere else.

More plausible information. Thanks.

And Step;2399248 said:
I have friends in Coit Ivoire that know the real story.

Wonderful. Fill us in.

And Step;2399248 said:
Your plagiarized, western media view is horse caca.

Sadly the rest of the world's mass media is no better.

All mass media [and most forums] can only handle PART of the truth.

And Step;2399248 said:
Allasane will not be successful because the French will get rid of him and place someone else there they can trust.

We'll see.
 
Last edited:
janklow;2402462 said:
as always, though, this type of statement alone remains meaningless on the internet

also, you're debating someone whose entire argument is "Muslims are evil"

MO, the supreme guide of MOslems, [according to Islamic sources] killed the family of woman and raped her that night.

IMever soHO that constitutes evil immoral guidance.

[course MOslems claim the woman consented to be screwed that night by the killer of her family and was ever so grateful to the wonderful MO for making her his wife]
 
Last edited:
oliverlang;2399966 said:
Thinks back to the Gitmo Bay photos...hmmm...right. Yeah the photo is f'd up, but let's not act like Christianity is free from despicable acts.

Also, I couldn't help but to notice you are promoting http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/quran/index.htm in your sig...but not promoting http://skepticsannotatedbible.com. I assume if you accept the one about the quran, then you should also appreciate the author's critique of the bible.

Satan created organized "christian" religion to fool people. People just like you.

Equating Koran with Bible,..... especially insinuating equality tween NT Christ and Mohammed/Koran,.... shows gross wilful ignorance.

Briefly: Christ was not a killer. Christ died a virgin. MO was a killer. MO was a serial rapist.
 
Last edited:
And Step;2408297 said:
That is a bullshit argument and it's irrelevant.
actually, it's completely relevant when you post like this:

"I have friends in Coit Ivoire that know the real story. Your plagiarized, western media view is horse caca. "

please tell me what part of that statement is making an allowance for being wrong as opposed to playing the "i know people, so my argument wins" card that dozens of people do on the internet. and here's the thing: i call everyone out on it, so there's no reason to let your emotions get so out of control over it.

if you've got an argument you can probably make it without the "i have friends" stuff; if not, you might end up hiding behind something like "quit advancing arguments i never made."

And Step;2408297 said:
Truth doesn't need to verified, It stands on it's own whether you or I accept it or not regardless to "verification".
and since we're debating topics on the internet, here's ANOTHER "meaningless on the internet" statement. yeah, there's an ultimate truth. you don't prove it by mentioning you know unverifiable people who know REAL THINGS.

And Step;2408297 said:
Oh so you are his official spokesman now? You're playing thought police? LOL. FOH, Janklow, your too smart for your own good. LOL
excuse me? have you actually read his posts?

i know you took a little vacation and all, but when you catch up you'll realize there's no reason for that bit there

John Prewett;2409034 said:
MO, the supreme guide of MOslems, [according to Islamic sources] killed the family of woman and raped her that night.

IMever soHO that constitutes evil immoral guidance.

[course MOslems claim the woman consented to be screwed that night by the killer of her family and was ever so grateful to the wonderful MO for making her his wife]
yes, yes, i know, this is your "i hate Muslims" thread for the day
 
Last edited:
John Prewett;2409043 said:
Satan created organized "christian" religion to fool people. People just like you.

Equating Koran with Bible,..... especially insinuating equality tween NT Christ and Mohammed/Koran,.... shows gross wilful ignorance.

Briefly: Christ was not a killer. Christ died a virgin. MO was a killer. MO was a serial rapist.

'Isa(a.s.) also did not bring an entire nation of alcoholics, murderers, and thieves into the most morally observant and peaceful nations on the planet

Moses died neither a virgin and he went on plenty of military campaigns as well as simply murdering the Egyptian so are you trying to say he was no a prophet of God?

what am i suppose to be "seeing" that's wrong in surah 24 of an-Nisa as well?

Oh wait I forgot you can't reason with Kafir's only warn them.
 
Last edited:

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
22
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…