ceothachosen1
New member
maybe ethnic group stick together in reaction to discrimination..............just maybe
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
wiseoneseekstruth;3476931 said:My ethnic background is a rich and detailed one.
I feel privileged honestly to know my family history compared to other folks who don't know if they came from African royalty or from European royalty or just their family lineage.
I am French Creole by the way. But to white folks, I'm a black man, to black people, they just consider me mixed.
I can trace my roots to a plantation in Louisiana to a black woman who ended up marrying her slave master and him fathering many kids. She eventually ended up being the only black woman to own her own plantation and bought back all her children that were sold off as slaves. It's located in the oldest parish/city in the Louisiana purchase. Melrose Plantation of Natchitoches Parish. (pronounced Nak o tish) The slave owner was a French man and I have Native American (got my census number on the way), African, Italian, French, Austrian, Polish and other flavors sprinkled in there.
Some would say it's just a fancy way of saying 'mutt'. But we have our own history and culture. If you ever been to New Orleans or even just Central Louisiana you would hear or see creole this or creole that. Sometimes confused with cajun, but two different things entirely.
So to answer the question, my ethnic background is very important to me. And if everyone was ignorant to being only involved with their own race, my heritage would not exist.
*Steps off soapbox*
Huruma;3477050 said:My ethnic heritage is a part of who I am. I'm not a nationalist or a separatist but I am pro-Black African unity. I can't imagine going through life not feeling some kind of connection or belonging to a group. You can say 'I'm just human', and I would agree that race, culture, ethnicity etc. are morally irrelevant characteristics, everyone's interests deserve the same equal concern, but the nature of love/empathy is necessarily discriminating. I view African people in the same way that most people view extended family members.
I doubt humans will ever really think of themselves as 'human' until they come across some kind of alien life-form with human like intelligence, or even create artificial intelligence with a human-like consciousness, who we can compare and define ourselves in contrast to (we're not the only sentient beings on the planet but we can't verbally communicate with most non-human animals so our relationships with them are different, they're not relationships between intellectual equals).
It's not surprising that Whites wouldn't identify as 'White' or feel connected to other White people if they were raised/live in a predominately White society that has never been historically subjugated by any non-White groups, no one became 'African' or 'Black' until the slave trade and colonialism of Africans/Africa. If you lived in a predominately Black environment, you would be reminded how unlike the majority you are on a regular basis, you would probably feel some self-consciousness (not necessarily bad) for that reason. When people are in the minority (not just racially/ethnically but even when it comes to hobbies and interests, views etc.), they tend to feel a connection other people who differ from the majority in whatever way they do.
Huruma;3477050 said:My ethnic heritage is a part of who I am. I'm not a nationalist or a separatist but I am pro-Black African unity. I can't imagine going through life not feeling some kind of connection or belonging to a group. You can say 'I'm just human', and I would agree that race, culture, ethnicity etc. are morally irrelevant characteristics, everyone's interests deserve the same equal concern, but the nature of love/empathy is necessarily discriminating. I view African people in the same way that most people view extended family members.
I doubt humans will ever really think of themselves as 'human' until they come across some kind of alien life-form with human like intelligence, or even create artificial intelligence with a human-like consciousness, who we can compare and define ourselves in contrast to (we're not the only sentient beings on the planet but we can't verbally communicate with most non-human animals so our relationships with them are different, they're not relationships between intellectual equals).
It's not surprising that Whites wouldn't identify as 'White' or feel connected to other White people if they were raised/live in a predominately White society that has never been historically subjugated by any non-White groups, no one became 'African' or 'Black' until the slave trade and colonialism of Africans/Africa. If you lived in a predominately Black environment, you would be reminded how unlike the majority you are on a regular basis, you would probably feel some self-consciousness (not necessarily bad) for that reason. When people are in the minority (not just racially/ethnically but even when it comes to hobbies and interests, views etc.), they tend to feel a connection other people who differ from the majority in whatever way they do.
Huruma, where are you from and do you know your ancestry?
I'm planning on doing a paper on pan africanism so I'm very interested in this topic. It seems that this position is mostly advocated by those who have not been in contact with their regional origins or those who are not quite aware of their ancestry.
Pan africanism movement was started by black americans and mostly advocated by them.
Being that I know my origins (Half-Cape Verdian, Half guine Bissau) and I have good understanding of the commonalities and differences between mostly Portuguese colonized countries I find it very hard to push for this kind of movement.
There is no commonality that unites all of Africa and african descendants besides oppression by Europeans.
So I don't think there could ever be one successful pro-Black African unity movement.
There is although a commonality between some of the african countries and most importantly some of the tribes even if they are in different countries.
Even with the example of the European Union, trying to push for this kind of movement is, in my opinion, is a bit cultural unsensitive.
And to answer the original question of this thread: No, I DGAF about which ethniticity a person is, as long as we have a basis for friendship. I have dated black/creole african, white european and most recently asian men. My best friends are actually: black african, white european and middle eastern (turkish).
(Actually never thought about this before, probably why i despise racists...)
Huruma;3480530 said:I was born in Zambia and my ancestry is Bemba.
My point exacly know barely nothing about this country and zero about this tribe
There are/were many African pan-Africanists (Nkrumah, Lumumba, Azikwe, Diop etc.)
You can find anyone to advocate for anything, the fact is pan-africanism was in fact conceived by slave descendant like DuBoius and Garvey, the fact that this theory was brought to light for discussion in the African political scene by africans is only to be expected and encouraged.
The person (Henry Silvester Williams) who actually coined the term 'pan-Africanism' was Trinidadian, if I'm not mistaken. I think the movement can be traced back to Edward Wilmot Blyden (also West Indian) or Martin Delaney, I don't know.
Well some peole agree it was Dubois but even if it was Wiliams he, when coining the term, simply followed a clear logical path (pan is greek for god/all so pan-africanism=all africans or unity in africans, the same logical path can be found in the word panacea = cure for all evils that fact alone is not very relevant)
I disagree, I see cultural similarities among all sub-saharan Africans (in comparison to non-Black Africans) and I think they share a common heritage and a history of European colonialism and similar political/social struggles is enough.
I disagree. My saying that I'm pro-African unity doesn't just mean I'm for some kind of political end-goal (like a United States of Africa), I identify with (most) Africans in a personal way, they're my people.
This is where we differ I don't believe a bond of opression is enough to justify any type of political union (and notice when I talk about Pan-Africanism I'm talking about it in a strictly political sense since that's what I study) for there to be a union there has to be a common gold and direction which I do not think all sub-sahara countries have specially because they are not all developmentally equal nor their temperaments are the same.The direction that an economically exponent Angola should take for the betterment of its people differs greatly from the direction of growingly impovorished Guinea Bissau. Cape-verdians don't die of hunger, Ethiopians do, and those differences are to glaring to be ignored.
I wouldn't downplay or ignore the cultural differences among Africans.
Exacly what I mean there is not enough substance there for a political union. After all this oppression and grouping different tribes in one territory without looking at the differences I just want to scream: We are not all the same: I'm of creole and mandjaco ancestry not mandinga (ST.Tome and Prince) nor Zulu and I want affirm my independence before being put in one bag with all others
I don't see a contradiction between being a pan-Africanist (pro-African unity, however you define 'African') and dating/befriending/identifying with non-Africans. Like I said, I'm not a nationalist or a separatist. People relate to other people for different reasons. Someone born in Texas to Nigerian parents can relate to other Texans (who aren't of Nigerian origin) in a way that they can't relate to Nigerians raised in Nigeria, they're culturally Americans and the U.S is their home, but, being raised by Nigerian parents, they can also relate to other Nigerian descendants living in Nigeria, Texas, Canada, the U.K etc. in a way that they can't relate to White fellow Texans.There's no conflict between a Nigerian-American identifying as American and identifying with people who share a similar ethnic heritage, even if that heritage doesn't come from the U.S. This is why I don't understand the idea that you're either completely assimilated and have no racial or ethnic consciousness whatsoever or you're a complete separatist. Most people feel connected to their family members in a way that they don't to strangers but this doesn't mean they want to segregate themselves from the rest of the world, it just means that they share a unique heritage with their family members that they don't with others.
Never said there was any contractions between being pan-africanist and dating/befriending/whatever people of other races. But just in terms of example I can tell you with no doubt that an st.tome mother will relate better to an chinese mother than to an angolan mother in terms of parenting style. Nor did I ever said that peple cant feel a special relation of belonging to a group without being assimilated; I feel a special belonging to the Cape- Verdian and Guine- Bissau community but I don't feel a special belonging to for example Zambia a country I know almost nothing about why should I because we're from Africa? Your history is not my history is all I'm saying.
ceothachosen1;3480187 said:so your great great gma was a black plantation/slave owner?
fuc_i_look_like;3476473 said:I prefer being around other Black folks. Black females, Black homies. That's just how it be...
garv;3480408 said:Its important to me, i don't care what these other coons say.
Young-Ice;3480343 said:what does that even mean though.
"your own people" ?
culturally, or physically?
Young-Ice;3508996 said:Just cause they look similar?
Young-Ice;3509074 said:I am though. You'd rather hang around black americans that are culturally different to you and behave much differently, than whites/middle eastern/latinos/asians that are culturally the similar and behave as such
right?
Young-Ice;3509074 said:I am though. You'd rather hang around black americans that are culturally different to you and behave much differently, than whites/middle eastern/latinos/asians that are culturally the similar and behave as such
right?
Young-Ice;3509176 said:Iono why they dont exist
when immigrants come here, they go to areas they know indian people are, and eventually there is a large indian population there (i.e. brampton)
why dont black folks do the same thing?
there would be a few all black middle class neihborhoods already