George Zimmerman Trial Thread (Found Not Guilty Jesus help us...)

[Matt-]

people need to stop talking about justice.

Justice has been served. Justice is our due process and right to a trial by jury. Not accepting the verdict does not mean justice was not carried out by our legaly system.

I'm ok with people being unhappy and excersizing their right to protest, but don't do it in the name of justice. Just man up and put on your signs and t-shirts that you want George Zimmerman to be killed

 

[GettinLo]

Juror was pussy.

I wanted to see her face

Here you go bruh...

The Strange Fruit of mystery George Zimmerman trial Juror B37 continues. Yet user Power of the Social Media website of Twitter, has made some alleged connections in wee early morning hours of July 16th with the hash tag #JurorB37.

Here's some of the latest information alleged via Twitter:

First--- It's ALLEGED that Juror B37 name is a "Josie NeJame".

Second --A Josie and Mark NeJame are married.

Third - A Mark NeJame is a CNN ‎Legal Analyst.

Fourth - A Mark NeJame provided legal analysis to CNN during the Casey Anthony Trial and pre- George Zimmerman post Zimmerman trial.

Firth - Orlando, Florida were a Mark NeJame Legal Practice is based out of is in Seminole County.

Sixth - Attorney Mark O' Mara is the President of the Seminole County Bar Association.

Seven - CNN was able to obtain a "Exclusive interview" on Anderson Cooper show last night with Juror B37.

Eight - Twitter got Juror B37 alleged book deal pulled

Independent Underground News & Talk will continue to provide our fans the latest updates on the post George Zimmerman Trial verdict information.

Read more:http://www.reachoutjobsearch.com/2013/07/strange-fruit-post-george-zimmerman.html#ixzz2ZDIqjdPw

 

[DarthRozay]

I already had to delete people off of facebook cause they were makin posts like "oh thank god! an innocent man is now free!" and shit

 

[stringer bell]

A Zimmerman Trial Juror Has Already Signed a Book Deal
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/nati...hos-looking-make-money-zimmerman-trial/67180/

smh

buzzfeed.com/jtes/zimmerman-juror-decides-not-to-write-a-book

Zimmerman Juror Decides Not To Write Book About Trial

Intense and immediate backlash apparently changed the mind of Juror B37 — and her agent. “I have realized that the best direction for me to go is away from writing any sort of book and return instead to my life as it was before …” posted on July 16, 2013

Late Monday night, Sharlene Martin of Martin Literary Management LLC told BuzzFeed that Juror B37 will no longer pursue a book deal.

The juror’s statement, via Martin:

“I realize it was necessary for our jury to be sequestered in order to protest our verdict from unfair outside influence, but that isolation shielded me from the depth of pain that exists among the general public over every aspect of this case. The potential book was always intended to be a respectful observation of the trial from my and my husband’s perspectives solely and it was to be an observation that our ‘system’ of justice can get so complicated that it creates a conflict with our ‘spirit’ of justice.

Now that I am returned to my family and to society in general, I have realized that the best direction for me to go is away from writing any sort of book and return instead to my life as it was before I was called to sit on this jury.”

The juror’s announcement came after Martin — who has also represented Amanda Knox’s ex Raffaele Sollecito — decided to drop her following hours of outrage on social media.

“After careful consideration regarding the proposed book project with Zimmerman Juror B37, I have decided to rescind my offer of representation in the exploration of a book based upon this case,” Martin said in an email at the time.

Earlier Monday, when the partnership was first announced, Martin said she hoped Juror B37’s book would help the public “understand the commitment it takes to serve and be sequestered on a jury in a highly publicized murder trial …. It could open a whole new dialogue about laws that may need to be revised and revamped to suit a 21st century way of life.”

But on Monday evening, Juror B37 went on CNN to defend the jury’s decision to find George Zimmerman not guilty.

“I think both were responsible for the situation they had gotten themselves into,” she said. “I think they both could have walked away.”

Not long after the interview aired, calls for Martin to drop the juror intensified. A Change.org petition by Genie Lauren circulated, asking Trayvon Martin supporters to not “allow this person to profit off of the injustice that they’ve served to the American public.” By 12:30 a.m. on Tuesday, it had more than 800 signatures.

Twitter: please tweet: @sharlenemartin and demand that she not represent a book by Juror B37. Twitter has power.

Dear @sharlenemartin, We ask that you not represent Juror B37 and her book. It is an exploitation of an innocent life.

I need for everyone to tell @sharlenemartin NOT TO PUBLISH JUROR B37'S BOOK! They can't be allowed to profit off of the MURDER OF A CHILD!

Boycott Martin Literary Management- take note of their tacky book list and swear to never spend a cent on them. Juror B37 @sharlenemartin

This went on for hours, until Martin contacted Lauren personally to say she was dropping the juror.

I'm going to respond to her message and ask her if she will make this statement publicly. But. . . HOLY SHIT!

Y'all. I'm crying, right now

Damn.. that came and went quick as hell...

 

[THIRDSUPREME]

http://www.inquisitr.com/851039/los-angeles-riots-video-trayvon-martin/

 

[stringer bell]

got damn David Webb his super coon level 6 got my head hurtin

I'm surprised that coon didn't offer to shine that fucker Tucker Carlson's shoes during the interview...

 

[stringer bell]

Juror was pussy.

I wanted to see her face

Here you go bruh...

The Strange Fruit of mystery George Zimmerman trial Juror B37 continues. Yet user Power of the Social Media website of Twitter, has made some alleged connections in wee early morning hours of July 16th with the hash tag #JurorB37.

Here's some of the latest information alleged via Twitter:

First--- It's ALLEGED that Juror B37 name is a "Josie NeJame".

Second --A Josie and Mark NeJame are married.

Third - A Mark NeJame is a CNN ‎Legal Analyst.

Fourth - A Mark NeJame provided legal analysis to CNN during the Casey Anthony Trial and pre- George Zimmerman post Zimmerman trial.

Firth - Orlando, Florida were a Mark NeJame Legal Practice is based out of is in Seminole County.

Sixth - Attorney Mark O' Mara is the President of the Seminole County Bar Association.

Seven - CNN was able to obtain a "Exclusive interview" on Anderson Cooper show last night with Juror B37.

Eight - Twitter got Juror B37 alleged book deal pulled

Independent Underground News & Talk will continue to provide our fans the latest updates on the post George Zimmerman Trial verdict information.

Read more:http://www.reachoutjobsearch.com/2013/07/strange-fruit-post-george-zimmerman.html#ixzz2ZDIqjdPw

First of all I'm surprised Mark NeJame guy is married to a woman.. cause when he is on CNN he comes off like he has got some rainbow sugar in his tank.. with that lispy voice and all those questionable drake like hand motions.. but any his wife doesn't fit the juror profile of b37:

Juror B37 is a middle-aged white woman who has worked for a chiropractor for 16 years, according to questions she answered during the jury selection process. She has two daughters aged 24 and 27. She used to have a concealed weapons permit but let it expire. Her husband continues to have a concealed weapons permit.

Juror B-37: A local for 18 years, and the daughter of an Air Force captain, she has been working for the same company for 16 years. Her husband is a "space attorney," meaning he has worked with the shuttle companies and is now working with rocket companies. One of her kids, a 24-year-old, is a pet groomer and the other is a 27-year-old student at the University of Central Florida. She likes animals and rescued them until her husband told her, "Stop!" She has been called to serve on a jury four times, but said she was never seated because of "where I work."

 

[gorilla]

btw, I watched MSNBC and CNN most of the day, and i must say in terms of the TV talking heads. I think the elephant in the room is that "they dont respect non-violence."

some times when the situation calls for it, u gotta kick some ass to get shit done. and the only way to do that is by rioting and burning shit down. they dont respect marchin, singin and prayin the hate away.

I feel you on that. We dealin with a race that's committed some of the most gruesome atrocities in history. Everywhere they've stepped foot, they have ravaged and destroyed. Spread disease and wreaked havoc. The same people whose ancestors violently stole a country and tells everybody to gtfo if they don't like it.

 

[GettinLo]

Juror was pussy.

I wanted to see her face

Here you go bruh...

The Strange Fruit of mystery George Zimmerman trial Juror B37 continues. Yet user Power of the Social Media website of Twitter, has made some alleged connections in wee early morning hours of July 16th with the hash tag #JurorB37.

Here's some of the latest information alleged via Twitter:

First--- It's ALLEGED that Juror B37 name is a "Josie NeJame".

Second --A Josie and Mark NeJame are married.

Third - A Mark NeJame is a CNN ‎Legal Analyst.

Fourth - A Mark NeJame provided legal analysis to CNN during the Casey Anthony Trial and pre- George Zimmerman post Zimmerman trial.

Firth - Orlando, Florida were a Mark NeJame Legal Practice is based out of is in Seminole County.

Sixth - Attorney Mark O' Mara is the President of the Seminole County Bar Association.

Seven - CNN was able to obtain a "Exclusive interview" on Anderson Cooper show last night with Juror B37.

Eight - Twitter got Juror B37 alleged book deal pulled

Independent Underground News & Talk will continue to provide our fans the latest updates on the post George Zimmerman Trial verdict information.

Read more:http://www.reachoutjobsearch.com/2013/07/strange-fruit-post-george-zimmerman.html#ixzz2ZDIqjdPw

First of all I'm surprised Mark NeJame guy is married to a woman.. cause when he is on CNN he comes off like he has got some rainbow sugar in his tank.. with that lispy voice and all those questionable drake like hand motions.. but any his wife doesn't fit the juror profile of b37:

Juror B37 is a middle-aged white woman who has worked for a chiropractor for 16 years, according to questions she answered during the jury selection process. She has two daughters aged 24 and 27. She used to have a concealed weapons permit but let it expire. Her husband continues to have a concealed weapons permit.

Juror B-37: A local for 18 years, and the daughter of an Air Force captain, she has been working for the same company for 16 years. Her husband is a "space attorney," meaning he has worked with the shuttle companies and is now working with rocket companies. One of her kids, a 24-year-old, is a pet groomer and the other is a 27-year-old student at the University of Central Florida. She likes animals and rescued them until her husband told her, "Stop!" She has been called to serve on a jury four times, but said she was never seated because of "where I work."

At this point it's anyone's guess... but interesting nonetheless...

 

[Dupac]

basically it comes down to this..

if you're a black male.... you fight back...you die...

bascially a man can break into my house, rape my wife, molest my child, and if i even seem like i'm going to fight back...in the great state of florida, i can be shot dead, and when he goes infront of a jury of his "peers"

all he gotta say is

"look at him...he's 6ft...265lbs...and i just raped his wife....if i had let that big nigga get his hands on me there's no doubt i woulda been killed....he left me with no choice"

and guess what?

not guilty...

everybody in this country has a right to defend themselves but black males....

we fight back...we die.....and the law will support it

 

[stringer bell]

For those you who missed the interview with the one of dumbest woman in America Juror B37...

 

[Ol Jay's]

so juror b37's husband went to school with Omara & her book was suppossedly written before the trial started, smh

Smh, the world is being duped to participate in an Occult ritual

Black people have no clue the spiritual power they hold, and it will be exploited in disguise as a candle light vigil for Trayvon this Saturday, & the ritual will be complete

 

[Recaptimus_Prime360]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LcdSZw2-C18

For those you who missed the interview with the one of dumbest woman in America Juror B37...

If I watch that vid, I'm finding that hefa.

 

[7figz]

so juror b37's husband went to school with Omara & her book was suppossedly written before the trial started, smh

Smh, the world is being duped to participate in an Occult ritual

Black people have no clue the spiritual power they hold, and it will be exploited in disguise as a candle light vigil for Trayvon this Saturday, & the ritual will be complete

I haven't listened to her video but if this is true, I wonder why that isn't legal grounds for a mistrial - for those who, think this is about the system / law ?

 

[Gold_Certificate]

I don't think having a biased juror is enough for a mistrial, if neither side tampered with them beforehand; jury selection was meant to rule them out.

And it's harder for the prosecution to request a mistrial after an acquittal because of "double jeopardy".

 

[jono]

so juror b37's husband went to school with Omara & her book was suppossedly written before the trial started, smh

Smh, the world is being duped to participate in an Occult ritual

Black people have no clue the spiritual power they hold, and it will be exploited in disguise as a candle light vigil for Trayvon this Saturday, & the ritual will be complete

I haven't listened to her video but if this is true, I wonder why that isn't legal grounds for a mistrial - for those who, think this is about the system / law ?

IF that is true then it might be grounds for a mistrial AND grounds for O'Mara to be disbarred.

HOWEVER without knowing for sure who that woman is and/or any relationship with the defense FOR SURE lets not get too excited or upset.

 

[stringer bell]

Bill O’Reilly Sees Two Groups Protesting Zimmerman Verdict: Either You ‘Hate America’ Or Think It’s ‘Racist’

 

[gorilla]

We all should know by now, especially after listening to this jurors interview, they see George as a nice guy who killed a violent black man. Those white women were terrified from the picture the defense painted of Trayvon. They made that boy look like the boogie man.

The jury was blatantly biased, THAT'S why he got off.

 

[1of1]

basically it comes down to this..

if you're a black male.... you fight back...you die...

bascially a man can break into my house, rape my wife, molest my child, and if i even seem like i'm going to fight back...in the great state of florida, i can be shot dead, and when he goes infront of a jury of his "peers"

all he gotta say is

"look at him...he's 6ft...265lbs...and i just raped his wife....if i had let that big nigga get his hands on me there's no doubt i woulda been killed....he left me with no choice"

and guess what?

not guilty...

everybody in this country has a right to defend themselves but black males....

we fight back...we die.....and the law will support it

No. Read the law @Du_Du. Don't poison those who don't read w/ ignorance by trying to make some exaggerated point to tap into their emotions. You ain't stupid you know that shit isn't true.

776.013 Home protection; use of deadly force; presumption of fear of death or great bodily harm.—(1) A person is presumed to have held a reasonable fear of imminent peril of death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another when using defensive force that is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm to another if: (a) The person against whom the defensive force was used was in the process of unlawfully and forcefully entering, or had unlawfully and forcibly entered, a dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle, or if that person had removed or was attempting to remove another against that person’s will from the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle; and (b) The person who uses defensive force knew or had reason to believe that an unlawful and forcible entry or unlawful and forcible act was occurring or had occurred.

(2) The presumption set forth in subsection (1) does not apply if:

(c) The person who uses defensive force is engaged in an unlawful activity or is using the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle to further an unlawful activity;

 

[StillFaggyAF]

776.013 Home protection; use of deadly force; presumption of fear of death or great bodily harm.—

(1) A person is presumed to have held a reasonable fear of imminent peril of death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another when using defensive force that is intended or likely to cause death or great bodily harm to another if:

(a) The person against whom the defensive force was used was in the process of unlawfully and forcefully entering, or had unlawfully and forcibly entered, a dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle, or if that person had removed or was attempting to remove another against that person’s will from the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle; and

(b) The person who uses defensive force knew or had reason to believe that an unlawful and forcible entry or unlawful and forcible act was occurring or had occurred.

(2) The presumption set forth in subsection (1) does not apply if:

(a) The person against whom the defensive force is used has the right to be in or is a lawful resident of the dwelling, residence, or vehicle, such as an owner, lessee, or titleholder, and there is not an injunction for protection from domestic violence or a written pretrial supervision order of no contact against that person; or

(b) The person or persons sought to be removed is a child or grandchild, or is otherwise in the lawful custody or under the lawful guardianship of, the person against whom the defensive force is used; or

(c) The person who uses defensive force is engaged in an unlawful activity or is using the dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle to further an unlawful activity; or

(d) The person against whom the defensive force is used is a law enforcement officer, as defined in s. 943.10(14), who enters or attempts to enter a dwelling, residence, or vehicle in the performance of his or her official duties and the officer identified himself or herself in accordance with any applicable law or the person using force knew or reasonably should have known that the person entering or attempting to enter was a law enforcement officer.

(3) A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in any other place where he or she has a right to be has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his or her ground and meet force with force, including deadly force if he or she reasonably believes it is necessary to do so to prevent death or great bodily harm to himself or herself or another or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.

(4) A person who unlawfully and by force enters or attempts to enter a person’s dwelling, residence, or occupied vehicle is presumed to be doing so with the intent to commit an unlawful act involving force or violence.

(5) As used in this section, the term:

(a) “Dwelling” means a building or conveyance of any kind, including any attached porch, whether the building or conveyance is temporary or permanent, mobile or immobile, which has a roof over it, including a tent, and is designed to be occupied by people lodging therein at night.

(b) “Residence” means a dwelling in which a person resides either temporarily or permanently or is visiting as an invited guest.

(c) “Vehicle” means a conveyance of any kind, whether or not motorized, which is designed to transport people or property.

History.—s. 1, ch. 2005-27.

post the whole thing if you gonna post it