G.Avant;6044848 said:
frostyicy;6044819 said:
G.Avant;6044799 said:
frostyicy;6044768 said:
This trial is a slap in the face to marginalized groups in the United States. No faith in the criminal justice system at all at this point.
Lets remain mindful yeah we do have a black commander in chief and we as blacks have made some progress, but lets be clear the civil rights movement was only a good 50 years ago, so we aren't that far gone from church bombings and lynchings. Race and socio-economic status drive the US and every system working in the machine.
To those speaking of strategic violence, in all honesty what would that prove, that we know how to be savages and deserved to be shot and killed which would justify the verdict of this trial?
The best way to bring down any organization or system is to infiltrate and destroy it from the inside out. How can this be done I am not sure, however I can say that strategic violence isn't the answer.
Psychological warfare is much more effective, subtle, indirect tactics are my weapons of choice.
Honestly black people need to start moving like the illuminati lol. I don't care if you believe they're real or not, we know the basis of how they move and I'm taking a page out of their book forreal. And as far as the strategic violence goes, violence rules this planet, nothing can truly be enforced or respected without the potential threat of violence lurking. Don't be fooled by the supposed progress of the human race, those superior in both savagery and intellect will always rule this planet. Look at white people the most aggressive and most savage but mufuckas looking at us like we the animals smdh
As you stated "nothing can truly be enforced or respected without the "potential threat" of violence lurking."
The potential for violence and rioting following the decision had already been rationalized prior to the verdict, yet it had no bearing on the decisions being made.
Intellect reigns supreme, the savagery isn't necessary if you can destroy a system with your intellect.
Don't get me wrong I totally understand the Machiavellian stance that you are proposing, but at the end of the day strategic violence isn't going to change anything other than pissing the government off which would cause possible marshal law and federal involvement. Think of Ruby Ridge and Branch Davidian in Waco. They showed the propensity to incite violence and look what happened.
This is why I said
strategic violence, I'm not talking about some random rioting and widespread anarchy, I'm talking about dealing with specific people which would make it much less likely for gov. to get involved. GZ being dealt with would send the message that even though the law might of gave you the green light to kill black people, you still would have serious repercussions for your actions.
Intellect is what gets you in position to utilize the savagery as well as understanding how to put it to use properly, but savagery is going to be a necessity. You don't think the people that you're trying to conquer/overcome will resist and use violence against you? How do you plan on protecting your shit? Violence is going to have to come into play at some point realistically.
The only way GZ would get touched is if he went to prison. GZ will walk the rest of his life paranoid from the torment but nothing is going to happen unless someone who has nothing to lose decides to do him in. I personally believe that there is more of a chance of him taking himself out than anyway else doing it, this I wouldn't be surprised about.
Black people do a lot of bitching about this type of thing and always say something about violence first when in reality they not going to do anything. The ones that talk the most about violence aren't even going to be rallying. That's why I take more of a systematic approach to promoting social change.
Of course people that a group is trying to overcome will have violence used against them, yet this is why I stated take out the system from within let them think that you are on their side and then methodically destroy them from within.
Killing him would send a message temporarily yet it would not have long lasting effects.