Female Police Captain Suspended After Calling out White Male Privilege

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Ever hear the phrase “know your audience?”

Also, when you play the outrage game, the other side will play the outrage game as well. All the extra PC bullshit doesnt help anyone in the end.
 
Will Munny;c-10130319 said:
Ever hear the phrase “know your audience?”

Also, when you play the outrage game, the other side will play the outrage game as well. All the extra PC bullshit doesnt help anyone in the end.

During a November 1 Police Supervisors Transgender Awareness Training at the Plainfield Police Department, a 28-year unnamed veteran of the force got into a disagreement with the workshop presenter. At the root of their exchange was a statistic suggesting that transgender people are 3.32 times more likely to become the victims of police violence than non-transgender people are. The contending officer argued that he struggles to comprehend such disproportionate police violence going on when (according to him) he nor anyone he knows of in the profession has been involved in a police brutality incident.

It sounds like she knew her audience and the dickhead pig who decided that factual statistics matter less than his own limited white male world view was the one who was playing the "outrage game".
 
Any statistics involving trannies and women should be looked at skeptically. Feminist and tranny "scholars" are known for being anti-science.
 
SneakDZA;c-10130440 said:
jono;c-10130352 said:
Any statistics involving trannies and women should be looked at skeptically. Feminist and tranny "scholars" are known for being anti-science.

lol... huh?

I think it's a criticism of the lack of rigour in their research. It's more qualitative than quantitative, which has a lot of drawbacks
 
LUClEN;c-10131021 said:
SneakDZA;c-10130440 said:
jono;c-10130352 said:
Any statistics involving trannies and women should be looked at skeptically. Feminist and tranny "scholars" are known for being anti-science.

lol... huh?

I think it's a criticism of the lack of rigour in their research. It's more qualitative than quantitative, which has a lot of drawbacks

who is "they" though? when i look at statistics I'm not thinking "was there a tranny or a woman involved?".

also this has nothing to do with the o/p except for the fact that the same lack of logic mixed with personal beliefs is involved.
 
SneakDZA;c-10131052 said:
LUClEN;c-10131021 said:
SneakDZA;c-10130440 said:
jono;c-10130352 said:
Any statistics involving trannies and women should be looked at skeptically. Feminist and tranny "scholars" are known for being anti-science.

lol... huh?

I think it's a criticism of the lack of rigour in their research. It's more qualitative than quantitative, which has a lot of drawbacks

who is "they" though? when i look at statistics I'm not thinking "was there a tranny or a woman involved?".

also this has nothing to do with the o/p except for the fact that the same lack of logic mixed with personal beliefs is involved.

Academics who study gender.

That's exactly the issue fam. They don't use stats as much as other social sciences do. It's qualitative data which is difficult to draw inferences from
 
LUClEN;c-10131066 said:
SneakDZA;c-10131052 said:
LUClEN;c-10131021 said:
SneakDZA;c-10130440 said:
jono;c-10130352 said:
Any statistics involving trannies and women should be looked at skeptically. Feminist and tranny "scholars" are known for being anti-science.

lol... huh?

I think it's a criticism of the lack of rigour in their research. It's more qualitative than quantitative, which has a lot of drawbacks

who is "they" though? when i look at statistics I'm not thinking "was there a tranny or a woman involved?".

also this has nothing to do with the o/p except for the fact that the same lack of logic mixed with personal beliefs is involved.

Academics who study gender.

That's exactly the issue fam. They don't use stats as much as other social sciences do. It's qualitative data which is difficult to draw inferences from

LUClEN;c-10131066 said:
SneakDZA;c-10131052 said:
LUClEN;c-10131021 said:
SneakDZA;c-10130440 said:
jono;c-10130352 said:
Any statistics involving trannies and women should be looked at skeptically. Feminist and tranny "scholars" are known for being anti-science.

lol... huh?

I think it's a criticism of the lack of rigour in their research. It's more qualitative than quantitative, which has a lot of drawbacks

who is "they" though? when i look at statistics I'm not thinking "was there a tranny or a woman involved?".

also this has nothing to do with the o/p except for the fact that the same lack of logic mixed with personal beliefs is involved.

Academics who study gender.

That's exactly the issue fam. They don't use stats as much as other social sciences do. It's qualitative data which is difficult to draw inferences from

ok so show me your sources.
 
I'm not gonna cull the library to show you what can be found pretty quickly. If you look at the data gender researchers use compared to those who study class or technology and society, there's way more qualitative research being done. I just did a qualitative methods course and it was one of the recurring themes. For a long time interviews and focus groups have been favoured by feminists studying gender
 
SneakDZA;c-10130341 said:
Will Munny;c-10130319 said:
Ever hear the phrase “know your audience?”

Also, when you play the outrage game, the other side will play the outrage game as well. All the extra PC bullshit doesnt help anyone in the end.

During a November 1 Police Supervisors Transgender Awareness Training at the Plainfield Police Department, a 28-year unnamed veteran of the force got into a disagreement with the workshop presenter. At the root of their exchange was a statistic suggesting that transgender people are 3.32 times more likely to become the victims of police violence than non-transgender people are. The contending officer argued that he struggles to comprehend such disproportionate police violence going on when (according to him) he nor anyone he knows of in the profession has been involved in a police brutality incident.

It sounds like she knew her audience and the dickhead pig who decided that factual statistics matter less than his own limited white male world view was the one who was playing the "outrage game".

Lol if it wasn’t for political correctness becoming a weapon, the cop would have just shrugged it off, but he knew if he acted offended it would get him the reaction he wanted.

Don’t go down the factual statistics road with transgender people. It doesn’t bode well for the mental sanity. No dis to trans folk I hope they figure it out.
 
he is funny because he will claim cops have a dangerous job and are killed every day but there are less than 300 killed per year out of over 700k. less than 1%. it seems that neither side should go down the statistics road.
 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
15
Views
98
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…