Female Dr stabs her boyfriend, hits him with laptop n punch, judge says jail would be too severe

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
D. Morgan;c-9781208 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781195 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781185 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781168 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781022 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9780907 said:
The Lonious Monk;c-9780676 said:
T. Sanford;c-9780515 said:
it's a bird, no it's a plane, no it's white privilege

Also a healthy dose of the female privilege that females claim don't exist. Let's be real, a man is not going to stab a woman, and have judge be lenient for that reason. Not unless he's rich. Rich privilege trumps all.

Healthy dose of female privilege? Eh i dunno...white men are out here getting little to no jail time for rape and manslaughter

And while female privilege does exist there is a such thing as intersectionality ...meaning a blk woman would more than likely not receive the same lenient treatment

A blk man definitely wouldn't unless he had a high priced legal team

So i agree money helps alot

Does that term apply to black men and children as well?

of course, why wouldn't it?

in·ter·sec·tion·al·i·ty.

[ˌin(t)ərsekSHəˈnalədē]

OUN

the interconnected nature of social categorizations such as race, class, and gender as they apply to a given individual or group, regarded as creating overlapping and interdependent systems of discrimination or disadvantage:

"through an awareness of intersectionality, we can better acknowledge and ground the differences among us"

now reread my post....

specifically while....

a blk woman would more than likely not receive the same lenient treatment
now
a blk man definitely wouldn't unless he had a high priced legal team

It really was just a yes or no question.

Thanks for the answer

the question suggests that you know or have very little understanding of the concept so I thought I'd help you out some

No it didn't suggest anything. IMO you "assumed" that and took it upon yourself to go further than what was asked of you.

I've been known what it is but every time I read or hear a black woman talking about it they never mention it in a situation involving black children or men. That is the only reason I asked.

well I have heard/read blk woman talking about it and mention blk children and men ....

here's an article

.....
http://thefeministgriote.com/mother...e-than-love-to-survive-in-a-racialized-world/

and another
http://www.gradientlair.com/post/52316045024/examining-race-oppression-gender-intersectionality

so......

and again the question in a vacuum does suggest that you have very little understanding of the concept ....same as for any woman or man who argues that the term doesn't apply to black men and blk children
 
Last edited:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781240 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781208 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781195 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781185 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781168 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781022 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9780907 said:
The Lonious Monk;c-9780676 said:
T. Sanford;c-9780515 said:
it's a bird, no it's a plane, no it's white privilege

Also a healthy dose of the female privilege that females claim don't exist. Let's be real, a man is not going to stab a woman, and have judge be lenient for that reason. Not unless he's rich. Rich privilege trumps all.

Healthy dose of female privilege? Eh i dunno...white men are out here getting little to no jail time for rape and manslaughter

And while female privilege does exist there is a such thing as intersectionality ...meaning a blk woman would more than likely not receive the same lenient treatment

A blk man definitely wouldn't unless he had a high priced legal team

So i agree money helps alot

Does that term apply to black men and children as well?

of course, why wouldn't it?

in·ter·sec·tion·al·i·ty.

[ˌin(t)ərsekSHəˈnalədē]

OUN

the interconnected nature of social categorizations such as race, class, and gender as they apply to a given individual or group, regarded as creating overlapping and interdependent systems of discrimination or disadvantage:

"through an awareness of intersectionality, we can better acknowledge and ground the differences among us"

now reread my post....

specifically while....

a blk woman would more than likely not receive the same lenient treatment
now
a blk man definitely wouldn't unless he had a high priced legal team

It really was just a yes or no question.

Thanks for the answer

the question suggests that you know or have very little understanding of the concept so I thought I'd help you out some

No it didn't suggest anything. IMO you "assumed" that and took it upon yourself to go further than what was asked of you.

I've been known what it is but every time I read or hear a black woman talking about it they never mention it in a situation involving black children or men. That is the only reason I asked.



I have heard/read blk woman talking about and mention blk children and men so....

here's an article

.....
http://thefeministgriote.com/mother...e-than-love-to-survive-in-a-racialized-world/

and another
http://www.gradientlair.com/post/52316045024/examining-race-oppression-gender-intersectionality

and again the question in a vacuum suggest that you have very little understanding of the concept ....same as any woman or man who argues that the term doesn't apply to black men and blk children

You heard it before.

I said I haven't heard it before for that situation.

See the difference?

End of story.

You can keep going on and on about what you ASSuming I do and don't know.

The question didn't suggest shit. You just wanted to make an assumption and use that to spout off a bunch of shit I didn't ask you.

 
D. Morgan;c-9781250 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781240 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781208 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781195 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781185 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781168 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781022 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9780907 said:
The Lonious Monk;c-9780676 said:
T. Sanford;c-9780515 said:
it's a bird, no it's a plane, no it's white privilege

Also a healthy dose of the female privilege that females claim don't exist. Let's be real, a man is not going to stab a woman, and have judge be lenient for that reason. Not unless he's rich. Rich privilege trumps all.

Healthy dose of female privilege? Eh i dunno...white men are out here getting little to no jail time for rape and manslaughter

And while female privilege does exist there is a such thing as intersectionality ...meaning a blk woman would more than likely not receive the same lenient treatment

A blk man definitely wouldn't unless he had a high priced legal team

So i agree money helps alot

Does that term apply to black men and children as well?

of course, why wouldn't it?

in·ter·sec·tion·al·i·ty.

[ˌin(t)ərsekSHəˈnalədē]

OUN

the interconnected nature of social categorizations such as race, class, and gender as they apply to a given individual or group, regarded as creating overlapping and interdependent systems of discrimination or disadvantage:

"through an awareness of intersectionality, we can better acknowledge and ground the differences among us"

now reread my post....

specifically while....

a blk woman would more than likely not receive the same lenient treatment
now
a blk man definitely wouldn't unless he had a high priced legal team

It really was just a yes or no question.

Thanks for the answer

the question suggests that you know or have very little understanding of the concept so I thought I'd help you out some

No it didn't suggest anything. IMO you "assumed" that and took it upon yourself to go further than what was asked of you.

I've been known what it is but every time I read or hear a black woman talking about it they never mention it in a situation involving black children or men. That is the only reason I asked.



I have heard/read blk woman talking about and mention blk children and men so....

here's an article

.....
http://thefeministgriote.com/mother...e-than-love-to-survive-in-a-racialized-world/

and another
http://www.gradientlair.com/post/52316045024/examining-race-oppression-gender-intersectionality

and again the question in a vacuum suggest that you have very little understanding of the concept ....same as any woman or man who argues that the term doesn't apply to black men and blk children

You heard it before.

I said I haven't heard it before for that situation.

See the difference?

End of story.

You can keep going on and on about what you ASSuming I do and don't know.

The question didn't suggest shit. You just wanted to make an assumption and use that to spout off a bunch of shit I didn't ask you.

lol Why so hostile man? @Madame_CJSkywalker is actually pretty reasonable for a feminist.

 
The Lonious Monk;c-9781256 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781250 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781240 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781208 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781195 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781185 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781168 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781022 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9780907 said:
The Lonious Monk;c-9780676 said:
T. Sanford;c-9780515 said:
it's a bird, no it's a plane, no it's white privilege

Also a healthy dose of the female privilege that females claim don't exist. Let's be real, a man is not going to stab a woman, and have judge be lenient for that reason. Not unless he's rich. Rich privilege trumps all.

Healthy dose of female privilege? Eh i dunno...white men are out here getting little to no jail time for rape and manslaughter

And while female privilege does exist there is a such thing as intersectionality ...meaning a blk woman would more than likely not receive the same lenient treatment

A blk man definitely wouldn't unless he had a high priced legal team

So i agree money helps alot

Does that term apply to black men and children as well?

of course, why wouldn't it?

in·ter·sec·tion·al·i·ty.

[ˌin(t)ərsekSHəˈnalədē]

OUN

the interconnected nature of social categorizations such as race, class, and gender as they apply to a given individual or group, regarded as creating overlapping and interdependent systems of discrimination or disadvantage:

"through an awareness of intersectionality, we can better acknowledge and ground the differences among us"

now reread my post....

specifically while....

a blk woman would more than likely not receive the same lenient treatment
now
a blk man definitely wouldn't unless he had a high priced legal team

It really was just a yes or no question.

Thanks for the answer

the question suggests that you know or have very little understanding of the concept so I thought I'd help you out some

No it didn't suggest anything. IMO you "assumed" that and took it upon yourself to go further than what was asked of you.

I've been known what it is but every time I read or hear a black woman talking about it they never mention it in a situation involving black children or men. That is the only reason I asked.



I have heard/read blk woman talking about and mention blk children and men so....

here's an article

.....
http://thefeministgriote.com/mother...e-than-love-to-survive-in-a-racialized-world/

and another
http://www.gradientlair.com/post/52316045024/examining-race-oppression-gender-intersectionality

and again the question in a vacuum suggest that you have very little understanding of the concept ....same as any woman or man who argues that the term doesn't apply to black men and blk children

You heard it before.

I said I haven't heard it before for that situation.

See the difference?

End of story.

You can keep going on and on about what you ASSuming I do and don't know.

The question didn't suggest shit. You just wanted to make an assumption and use that to spout off a bunch of shit I didn't ask you.

lol Why so hostile man? @Madame_CJSkywalker is actually pretty reasonable for a feminist.

Not hostile at all.

I've actually conversed with her on more than one occasion.

I have no problem with her at all.

We disagreeing right now but never hostile because that would be uncalled for.
 
D. Morgan;c-9781250 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781240 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781208 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781195 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781185 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781168 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781022 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9780907 said:
The Lonious Monk;c-9780676 said:
T. Sanford;c-9780515 said:
it's a bird, no it's a plane, no it's white privilege

Also a healthy dose of the female privilege that females claim don't exist. Let's be real, a man is not going to stab a woman, and have judge be lenient for that reason. Not unless he's rich. Rich privilege trumps all.

Healthy dose of female privilege? Eh i dunno...white men are out here getting little to no jail time for rape and manslaughter

And while female privilege does exist there is a such thing as intersectionality ...meaning a blk woman would more than likely not receive the same lenient treatment

A blk man definitely wouldn't unless he had a high priced legal team

So i agree money helps alot

Does that term apply to black men and children as well?

of course, why wouldn't it?

in·ter·sec·tion·al·i·ty.

[ˌin(t)ərsekSHəˈnalədē]

OUN

the interconnected nature of social categorizations such as race, class, and gender as they apply to a given individual or group, regarded as creating overlapping and interdependent systems of discrimination or disadvantage:

"through an awareness of intersectionality, we can better acknowledge and ground the differences among us"

now reread my post....

specifically while....

a blk woman would more than likely not receive the same lenient treatment
now
a blk man definitely wouldn't unless he had a high priced legal team

It really was just a yes or no question.

Thanks for the answer

the question suggests that you know or have very little understanding of the concept so I thought I'd help you out some

No it didn't suggest anything. IMO you "assumed" that and took it upon yourself to go further than what was asked of you.

I've been known what it is but every time I read or hear a black woman talking about it they never mention it in a situation involving black children or men. That is the only reason I asked.



I have heard/read blk woman talking about and mention blk children and men so....

here's an article

.....
http://thefeministgriote.com/mother...e-than-love-to-survive-in-a-racialized-world/

and another
http://www.gradientlair.com/post/52316045024/examining-race-oppression-gender-intersectionality

and again the question in a vacuum suggest that you have very little understanding of the concept ....same as any woman or man who argues that the term doesn't apply to black men and blk children

You heard it before.

I said I haven't heard it before for that situation.

See the difference?

End of story.

You can keep going on and on about what you ASSuming I do and don't know.

The question didn't suggest shit. You just wanted to make an assumption and use that to spout off a bunch of shit I didn't ask you.

if I ask what is 2 + 2 does that not suggest a certain amount of ignorance on my part? lol

and asking "does the term apply to black men and children as well?" in the context discussion implies that i believe that it wouldn't ....am i not then allowed to explain my position

but yea I'm only trying to enlighten you boo

while you may not have encountered certain things, they are out there

 
Last edited:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781320 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781250 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781240 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781208 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781195 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781185 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781168 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781022 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9780907 said:
The Lonious Monk;c-9780676 said:
T. Sanford;c-9780515 said:
it's a bird, no it's a plane, no it's white privilege

Also a healthy dose of the female privilege that females claim don't exist. Let's be real, a man is not going to stab a woman, and have judge be lenient for that reason. Not unless he's rich. Rich privilege trumps all.

Healthy dose of female privilege? Eh i dunno...white men are out here getting little to no jail time for rape and manslaughter

And while female privilege does exist there is a such thing as intersectionality ...meaning a blk woman would more than likely not receive the same lenient treatment

A blk man definitely wouldn't unless he had a high priced legal team

So i agree money helps alot

Does that term apply to black men and children as well?

of course, why wouldn't it?

in·ter·sec·tion·al·i·ty.

[ˌin(t)ərsekSHəˈnalədē]

OUN

the interconnected nature of social categorizations such as race, class, and gender as they apply to a given individual or group, regarded as creating overlapping and interdependent systems of discrimination or disadvantage:

"through an awareness of intersectionality, we can better acknowledge and ground the differences among us"

now reread my post....

specifically while....

a blk woman would more than likely not receive the same lenient treatment
now
a blk man definitely wouldn't unless he had a high priced legal team

It really was just a yes or no question.

Thanks for the answer

the question suggests that you know or have very little understanding of the concept so I thought I'd help you out some

No it didn't suggest anything. IMO you "assumed" that and took it upon yourself to go further than what was asked of you.

I've been known what it is but every time I read or hear a black woman talking about it they never mention it in a situation involving black children or men. That is the only reason I asked.



I have heard/read blk woman talking about and mention blk children and men so....

here's an article

.....
http://thefeministgriote.com/mother...e-than-love-to-survive-in-a-racialized-world/

and another
http://www.gradientlair.com/post/52316045024/examining-race-oppression-gender-intersectionality

and again the question in a vacuum suggest that you have very little understanding of the concept ....same as any woman or man who argues that the term doesn't apply to black men and blk children

You heard it before.

I said I haven't heard it before for that situation.

See the difference?

End of story.

You can keep going on and on about what you ASSuming I do and don't know.

The question didn't suggest shit. You just wanted to make an assumption and use that to spout off a bunch of shit I didn't ask you.

if I ask what is 2 + 2 does that not suggest a certain amount of ignorance on my part? lol

and asking "does the term apply to black men and children as well?" in the context discussion implies that i believe that it wouldn't ....am i not then allowed to explain my position

but yea I'm only trying to enlighten you boo

while you may not have encountered certain things, they are out there

If you ask me what s 2+2. I will say 4 and leave it at that and think nothing else about whether or not you know how to add. Only way I would elaborate is if after I gave you the answer you asked how I can up with the number 4.

It wasn't a fishing type of question. It was a yes or no question. That's it.

I don't know what you believe or don't.

My question was the equivalent to Bill Duke on Menace II Society.

"I got a real simple question and I want a real simple answer". Which is why it was phrased as a simple yes or no question.

No explanation needed.

 
D. Morgan;c-9782525 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781320 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781250 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781240 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781208 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781195 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781185 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781168 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781022 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9780907 said:
The Lonious Monk;c-9780676 said:
T. Sanford;c-9780515 said:
it's a bird, no it's a plane, no it's white privilege

Also a healthy dose of the female privilege that females claim don't exist. Let's be real, a man is not going to stab a woman, and have judge be lenient for that reason. Not unless he's rich. Rich privilege trumps all.

Healthy dose of female privilege? Eh i dunno...white men are out here getting little to no jail time for rape and manslaughter

And while female privilege does exist there is a such thing as intersectionality ...meaning a blk woman would more than likely not receive the same lenient treatment

A blk man definitely wouldn't unless he had a high priced legal team

So i agree money helps alot

Does that term apply to black men and children as well?

of course, why wouldn't it?

in·ter·sec·tion·al·i·ty.

[ˌin(t)ərsekSHəˈnalədē]

OUN

the interconnected nature of social categorizations such as race, class, and gender as they apply to a given individual or group, regarded as creating overlapping and interdependent systems of discrimination or disadvantage:

"through an awareness of intersectionality, we can better acknowledge and ground the differences among us"

now reread my post....

specifically while....

a blk woman would more than likely not receive the same lenient treatment
now
a blk man definitely wouldn't unless he had a high priced legal team

It really was just a yes or no question.

Thanks for the answer

the question suggests that you know or have very little understanding of the concept so I thought I'd help you out some

No it didn't suggest anything. IMO you "assumed" that and took it upon yourself to go further than what was asked of you.

I've been known what it is but every time I read or hear a black woman talking about it they never mention it in a situation involving black children or men. That is the only reason I asked.



I have heard/read blk woman talking about and mention blk children and men so....

here's an article

.....
http://thefeministgriote.com/mother...e-than-love-to-survive-in-a-racialized-world/

and another
http://www.gradientlair.com/post/52316045024/examining-race-oppression-gender-intersectionality

and again the question in a vacuum suggest that you have very little understanding of the concept ....same as any woman or man who argues that the term doesn't apply to black men and blk children

You heard it before.

I said I haven't heard it before for that situation.

See the difference?

End of story.

You can keep going on and on about what you ASSuming I do and don't know.

The question didn't suggest shit. You just wanted to make an assumption and use that to spout off a bunch of shit I didn't ask you.

if I ask what is 2 + 2 does that not suggest a certain amount of ignorance on my part? lol

and asking "does the term apply to black men and children as well?" in the context discussion implies that i believe that it wouldn't ....am i not then allowed to explain my position

but yea I'm only trying to enlighten you boo

while you may not have encountered certain things, they are out there

If you ask me what s 2+2. I will say 4 and leave it at that and think nothing else about whether or not you know how to add. Only way I would elaborate is if after I gave you the answer you asked how I can up with the number 4.

It wasn't a fishing type of question. It was a yes or no question. That's it.

I don't know what you believe or don't.

My question was the equivalent to Bill Duke on Menace II Society.

"I got a real simple question and I want a real simple answer". Which is why it was phrased as a simple yes or no question.

No explanation needed.

why would I or anyone ask a question if I didn't know the answer or how to arrive at an answer without assistance

unless it was rhetorical question and or the person asking the question had ulterior motives. I assumed the former because I wanted to give you the benefit of the doubt

either way, I answered your question which you initially didn't specify required only a yes or no answer. you just didn't like the answer. but its cool love

considering you have never read or heard a blk woman talking about it and mention it in a situation involving black children or men, glad I was able to change that

 
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9783094 said:
D. Morgan;c-9782525 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781320 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781250 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781240 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781208 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781195 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781185 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781168 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781022 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9780907 said:
The Lonious Monk;c-9780676 said:
T. Sanford;c-9780515 said:
it's a bird, no it's a plane, no it's white privilege

Also a healthy dose of the female privilege that females claim don't exist. Let's be real, a man is not going to stab a woman, and have judge be lenient for that reason. Not unless he's rich. Rich privilege trumps all.

Healthy dose of female privilege? Eh i dunno...white men are out here getting little to no jail time for rape and manslaughter

And while female privilege does exist there is a such thing as intersectionality ...meaning a blk woman would more than likely not receive the same lenient treatment

A blk man definitely wouldn't unless he had a high priced legal team

So i agree money helps alot

Does that term apply to black men and children as well?

of course, why wouldn't it?

in·ter·sec·tion·al·i·ty.

[ˌin(t)ərsekSHəˈnalədē]

OUN

the interconnected nature of social categorizations such as race, class, and gender as they apply to a given individual or group, regarded as creating overlapping and interdependent systems of discrimination or disadvantage:

"through an awareness of intersectionality, we can better acknowledge and ground the differences among us"

now reread my post....

specifically while....

a blk woman would more than likely not receive the same lenient treatment
now
a blk man definitely wouldn't unless he had a high priced legal team

It really was just a yes or no question.

Thanks for the answer

the question suggests that you know or have very little understanding of the concept so I thought I'd help you out some

No it didn't suggest anything. IMO you "assumed" that and took it upon yourself to go further than what was asked of you.

I've been known what it is but every time I read or hear a black woman talking about it they never mention it in a situation involving black children or men. That is the only reason I asked.



I have heard/read blk woman talking about and mention blk children and men so....

here's an article

.....
http://thefeministgriote.com/mother...e-than-love-to-survive-in-a-racialized-world/

and another
http://www.gradientlair.com/post/52316045024/examining-race-oppression-gender-intersectionality

and again the question in a vacuum suggest that you have very little understanding of the concept ....same as any woman or man who argues that the term doesn't apply to black men and blk children

You heard it before.

I said I haven't heard it before for that situation.

See the difference?

End of story.

You can keep going on and on about what you ASSuming I do and don't know.

The question didn't suggest shit. You just wanted to make an assumption and use that to spout off a bunch of shit I didn't ask you.

if I ask what is 2 + 2 does that not suggest a certain amount of ignorance on my part? lol

and asking "does the term apply to black men and children as well?" in the context discussion implies that i believe that it wouldn't ....am i not then allowed to explain my position

but yea I'm only trying to enlighten you boo

while you may not have encountered certain things, they are out there

If you ask me what s 2+2. I will say 4 and leave it at that and think nothing else about whether or not you know how to add. Only way I would elaborate is if after I gave you the answer you asked how I can up with the number 4.

It wasn't a fishing type of question. It was a yes or no question. That's it.

I don't know what you believe or don't.

My question was the equivalent to Bill Duke on Menace II Society.

"I got a real simple question and I want a real simple answer". Which is why it was phrased as a simple yes or no question.

No explanation needed.

why would I or anyone ask a question if I didn't know the answer or how to arrive at an answer without assistance

unless it was rhetorical question and or the person asking the question had ulterior motives
. I assumed the former because I wanted to give you the benefit of the doubt

either way, I answered your question which you initially didn't specify required only a yes or no answer. you just didn't like the answer. but its cool love

considering you have never read or heard a blk woman talking about it and mention it in a situation involving black children or men, glad I was able to change that

6594966.jpg


 
Last edited:
D. Morgan;c-9783106 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9783094 said:
D. Morgan;c-9782525 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781320 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781250 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781240 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781208 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781195 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781185 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781168 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781022 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9780907 said:
The Lonious Monk;c-9780676 said:
T. Sanford;c-9780515 said:
it's a bird, no it's a plane, no it's white privilege

Also a healthy dose of the female privilege that females claim don't exist. Let's be real, a man is not going to stab a woman, and have judge be lenient for that reason. Not unless he's rich. Rich privilege trumps all.

Healthy dose of female privilege? Eh i dunno...white men are out here getting little to no jail time for rape and manslaughter

And while female privilege does exist there is a such thing as intersectionality ...meaning a blk woman would more than likely not receive the same lenient treatment

A blk man definitely wouldn't unless he had a high priced legal team

So i agree money helps alot

Does that term apply to black men and children as well?

of course, why wouldn't it?

in·ter·sec·tion·al·i·ty.

[ˌin(t)ərsekSHəˈnalədē]

OUN

the interconnected nature of social categorizations such as race, class, and gender as they apply to a given individual or group, regarded as creating overlapping and interdependent systems of discrimination or disadvantage:

"through an awareness of intersectionality, we can better acknowledge and ground the differences among us"

now reread my post....

specifically while....

a blk woman would more than likely not receive the same lenient treatment
now
a blk man definitely wouldn't unless he had a high priced legal team

It really was just a yes or no question.

Thanks for the answer

the question suggests that you know or have very little understanding of the concept so I thought I'd help you out some

No it didn't suggest anything. IMO you "assumed" that and took it upon yourself to go further than what was asked of you.

I've been known what it is but every time I read or hear a black woman talking about it they never mention it in a situation involving black children or men. That is the only reason I asked.



I have heard/read blk woman talking about and mention blk children and men so....

here's an article

.....
http://thefeministgriote.com/mother...e-than-love-to-survive-in-a-racialized-world/

and another
http://www.gradientlair.com/post/52316045024/examining-race-oppression-gender-intersectionality

and again the question in a vacuum suggest that you have very little understanding of the concept ....same as any woman or man who argues that the term doesn't apply to black men and blk children

You heard it before.

I said I haven't heard it before for that situation.

See the difference?

End of story.

You can keep going on and on about what you ASSuming I do and don't know.

The question didn't suggest shit. You just wanted to make an assumption and use that to spout off a bunch of shit I didn't ask you.

if I ask what is 2 + 2 does that not suggest a certain amount of ignorance on my part? lol

and asking "does the term apply to black men and children as well?" in the context discussion implies that i believe that it wouldn't ....am i not then allowed to explain my position

but yea I'm only trying to enlighten you boo

while you may not have encountered certain things, they are out there

If you ask me what s 2+2. I will say 4 and leave it at that and think nothing else about whether or not you know how to add. Only way I would elaborate is if after I gave you the answer you asked how I can up with the number 4.

It wasn't a fishing type of question. It was a yes or no question. That's it.

I don't know what you believe or don't.

My question was the equivalent to Bill Duke on Menace II Society.

"I got a real simple question and I want a real simple answer". Which is why it was phrased as a simple yes or no question.

No explanation needed.

why would I or anyone ask a question if I didn't know the answer or how to arrive at an answer without assistance

unless it was rhetorical question and or the person asking the question had ulterior motives.
I assumed [/b]the former because I wanted to give you the benefit of the doubt

either way, I answered your question which you initially didn't specify required only a yes or no answer. you just didn't like the answer. but its cool love

considering you have never read or heard a blk woman talking about it and mention it in a situation involving black children or men, glad I was able to change that




6594966.jpg




again its cool

I'm here to help
 
Last edited:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9783112 said:
D. Morgan;c-9783106 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9783094 said:
D. Morgan;c-9782525 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781320 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781250 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781240 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781208 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781195 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781185 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9781168 said:
D. Morgan;c-9781022 said:
Madame_CJSkywalker;c-9780907 said:
The Lonious Monk;c-9780676 said:
T. Sanford;c-9780515 said:
it's a bird, no it's a plane, no it's white privilege

Also a healthy dose of the female privilege that females claim don't exist. Let's be real, a man is not going to stab a woman, and have judge be lenient for that reason. Not unless he's rich. Rich privilege trumps all.

Healthy dose of female privilege? Eh i dunno...white men are out here getting little to no jail time for rape and manslaughter

And while female privilege does exist there is a such thing as intersectionality ...meaning a blk woman would more than likely not receive the same lenient treatment

A blk man definitely wouldn't unless he had a high priced legal team

So i agree money helps alot

Does that term apply to black men and children as well?

of course, why wouldn't it?

in·ter·sec·tion·al·i·ty.

[ˌin(t)ərsekSHəˈnalədē]

OUN

the interconnected nature of social categorizations such as race, class, and gender as they apply to a given individual or group, regarded as creating overlapping and interdependent systems of discrimination or disadvantage:

"through an awareness of intersectionality, we can better acknowledge and ground the differences among us"

now reread my post....

specifically while....

a blk woman would more than likely not receive the same lenient treatment
now
a blk man definitely wouldn't unless he had a high priced legal team

It really was just a yes or no question.

Thanks for the answer

the question suggests that you know or have very little understanding of the concept so I thought I'd help you out some

No it didn't suggest anything. IMO you "assumed" that and took it upon yourself to go further than what was asked of you.

I've been known what it is but every time I read or hear a black woman talking about it they never mention it in a situation involving black children or men. That is the only reason I asked.



I have heard/read blk woman talking about and mention blk children and men so....

here's an article

.....
http://thefeministgriote.com/mother...e-than-love-to-survive-in-a-racialized-world/

and another
http://www.gradientlair.com/post/52316045024/examining-race-oppression-gender-intersectionality

and again the question in a vacuum suggest that you have very little understanding of the concept ....same as any woman or man who argues that the term doesn't apply to black men and blk children

You heard it before.

I said I haven't heard it before for that situation.

See the difference?

End of story.

You can keep going on and on about what you ASSuming I do and don't know.

The question didn't suggest shit. You just wanted to make an assumption and use that to spout off a bunch of shit I didn't ask you.

if I ask what is 2 + 2 does that not suggest a certain amount of ignorance on my part? lol

and asking "does the term apply to black men and children as well?" in the context discussion implies that i believe that it wouldn't ....am i not then allowed to explain my position

but yea I'm only trying to enlighten you boo

while you may not have encountered certain things, they are out there

If you ask me what s 2+2. I will say 4 and leave it at that and think nothing else about whether or not you know how to add. Only way I would elaborate is if after I gave you the answer you asked how I can up with the number 4.

It wasn't a fishing type of question. It was a yes or no question. That's it.

I don't know what you believe or don't.

My question was the equivalent to Bill Duke on Menace II Society.

"I got a real simple question and I want a real simple answer". Which is why it was phrased as a simple yes or no question.

No explanation needed.

why would I or anyone ask a question if I didn't know the answer or how to arrive at an answer without assistance

unless it was rhetorical question and or the person asking the question had ulterior motives.
I assumed [/b]the former because I wanted to give you the benefit of the doubt

either way, I answered your question which you initially didn't specify required only a yes or no answer. you just didn't like the answer. but its cool love

considering you have never read or heard a blk woman talking about it and mention it in a situation involving black children or men, glad I was able to change that




6594966.jpg




again its cool

I'm here to give


Always has been

I appreciate it!
 

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
31
Views
69
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…