Father OWNS the police

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
He used a whole lot of words and didnt say shit. this nigga aint educated, he just using big words and them cops dumb as shit. SHit, in some jurisdictions it aint even legal to tape the cops.
 
Last edited:
sboogie;3059226 said:
I'm going to get me one of them hats...

my brother i feel what you trying to do but the knowledge comes from the books not the hats lol
 
Last edited:
man i love this video so much cus, last week i got stopped by police because i walked up a road and back down a road (ONCE) and they said they had seen me walking up and down the road numerous times acting suspiciously, and they have had a problem recently with drug dealers.........

maaaan i gave them a problem, i spoke to them in an educated way but i was FURIOUS so it kinda came out like i was just that dude switching on police....suffice to say though, i sent them walking with their tails between their legs, shit felt gooooooood. but yeh i think im going to start reading up on law cus hearing that brother speak made me feel good for a minute there
 
Last edited:
ibedamned;3060644 said:
He used a whole lot of words and didnt say shit. this nigga aint educated, he just using big words and them cops dumb as shit. SHit, in some jurisdictions it aint even legal to tape the cops.

"Illinois, Massachusetts, and Maryland are among the 12 states in which all parties must consent for a recording to be legal unless, as with TV news crews, it is obvious to all that recording is underway. Since the police do not consent, the camera-wielder can be arrested. Most all-party-consent states also include an exception for recording in public places where "no expectation of privacy exists" (Illinois does not) but in practice this exception is not being recognized."

This is how I always understood it to be. Stemming from conversations after all those girls gone wild lawsuits lol
 
Last edited:
bdbdbd;3060676 said:
man i love this video so much cus, last week i got stopped by police because i walked up a road and back down a road (ONCE) and they said they had seen me walking up and down the road numerous times acting suspiciously, and they have had a problem recently with drug dealers.........

maaaan i gave them a problem, i spoke to them in an educated way but i was FURIOUS so it kinda came out like i was just that dude switching on police....suffice to say though, i sent them walking with their tails between their legs, shit felt gooooooood. but yeh i think im going to start reading up on law cus hearing that brother speak made me feel good for a minute there

ok i just read a lot of ure replies and realised he wasnt really talking sense....either way i still wanna understand my rights so next time i get stopped for "walking suspisciously" i can hold my ground....plus he still had them cops shook, by the looks of it, if you just use big words to cops and atleast act like u know what you are talking about then ure pretty much OK
 
Last edited:
bdbdbd;3060701 said:
ok i just read a lot of ure replies and realised he wasnt really talking sense....either way i still wanna understand my rights so next time i get stopped for "walking suspisciously" i can hold my ground....plus he still had them cops shook, by the looks of it, if you just use big words to cops and atleast act like u know what you are talking about then ure pretty much OK

Just so you know if you google some of the things he was saying you can read up on some of it like the delegation of authority for instance. He wasn't COMPLETELY wrong, maybe the application of it in this instance. But you can also find some of what he was saying within immigration law also. But either way it goes law is only good if it can be applied correctly to the situation at hand. For instance at the beginning of the conversation police officers do have to give you some information though it doesn't show on the video what information he's been asking about. Also you DO have to give your name to police officers if they ask which I think he might have said the opposite. But your name or producing an identification is the ONLY thing you have to give to an officer you do not have to give any other information to them.

But honestly even if he didn't know exactly how he should apply his rights or how his rights applied to his situation at that time him knowing a little bit about unimportant law allowed him to say and do what he wanted at that given time. Showing an uninformed person you know a little bit about a little bit is sometimes enough to get your point across.
 
Last edited:
that shit was hilarious homie sounded like Busta on look at me now. thank god for the camera tho they d beat his ass by international law
 
Last edited:
Elzo69Reloaded;3060780 said:
that shit was hilarious homie sounded like Busta on look at me now. thank god for the camera tho they d beat his ass by international law

Camera or not. They beat that ass they takin the camera too. Lol ya'll thinkin cops don't snatch video up if they know they in the wrong? The cops will take that shit and if they nice they'll tell you they're keeping it for evidence and you can get it at the police department after the case is over so you can go up there and they "can't find it". But they'll just take that shit if they want to. A camera held by the guy they wanna beat down ain't gone stop shit as a matter of fact that's easier for them to deal with than an innocent civilian that has nothing to do with the situation act like ya'll know whats good out there.
 
Last edited:
sboogie;3060575 said:
its funny how certain types of people see certain things differently...

I seen plenty of videos and a handful of real life incidents where people started confidently telling the cops what's what with the law rightly or wrongly, and those sommommabitches got arrested.

Of course it isn't clear why the cops did what they did, so we're all making assumptions.
 
Last edited:
im_lux;3060759 said:
Just so you know if you google some of the things he was saying you can read up on some of it like the delegation of authority for instance. He wasn't COMPLETELY wrong, maybe the application of it in this instance. But you can also find some of what he was saying within immigration law also. But either way it goes law is only good if it can be applied correctly to the situation at hand. For instance at the beginning of the conversation police officers do have to give you some information though it doesn't show on the video what information he's been asking about. Also you DO have to give your name to police officers if they ask which I think he might have said the opposite. But your name or producing an identification is the ONLY thing you have to give to an officer you do not have to give any other information to them.

But honestly even if he didn't know exactly how he should apply his rights or how his rights applied to his situation at that time him knowing a little bit about unimportant law allowed him to say and do what he wanted at that given time. Showing an uninformed person you know a little bit about a little bit is sometimes enough to get your point across.

yeh respect for that man, im just gna study up hard.....ive been stopped for the most stupidest reasons and have had to give my details about who i am and where i live and i dont see how that shit is fair......i was standing outside a shopping center, waiting for my friend for about 10mins and supposedly that was me acting suspicious so i got searched and had to give my details......that was when i was younger so i let it happen, thers no way i would now though.....but yeh, basically i have to leave my house thinking if i stand in one spot to long or walk up and down a road i should expect to get stopped and questioned......shits crazy.

but yeh as for the bolded, im sure if you give them your name, or a piece of ID they can pretty much access all info on you, especially if u got a record?

man its crazy how people who we fund to "protect us" dont even understand the rules they are meant to be upholding....at my job if i dont know the history, the aim and goals of the company, the technological advances etc...then you best believe im getting fired...and lives dont rely on me doing my job right
 
Last edited:
bdbdbd;3060826 said:
yeh respect for that man, im just gna study up hard.....ive been stopped for the most stupidest reasons and have had to give my details about who i am and where i live and i dont see how that shit is fair......i was standing outside a shopping center, waiting for my friend for about 10mins and supposedly that was me acting suspicious so i got searched and had to give my details......that was when i was younger so i let it happen, thers no way i would now though.....but yeh, basically i have to leave my house thinking if i stand in one spot to long or walk up and down a road i should expect to get stopped and questioned......shits crazy.

but yeh as for the bolded, im sure if you give them your name, or a piece of ID they can pretty much access all info on you, especially if u got a record?

man its crazy how people who we fund to "protect us" dont even understand the rules they are meant to be upholding....at my job if i dont know the history, the aim and goals of the company, the technological advances etc...then you best believe im getting fired...and lives dont rely on me doing my job right

As far as the search goes if what you're saying is all of it they didn't have a right to search you though most people consent to searches which gives them permission but you don't HAVE to. They have to have cause to search you...like if they seen you with something hanging out of your pocket or they maybe seen you putting out a blunt or even if you just "smell like weed" all of which would be a bit hard for you to argue in court.

And yeah once you give your name and they find you in the system they have all information through DMV files and criminal files that are on record.

And yeah there should most definately be some sort of minimum understanding of basic law and human rights that is above what they are supposed to know at this moment. In order to be a cop they learn a lot of what they can do but don't learn as much of what they cannot it seems. Then plus if everyone is letting them do it they start expecting it. Like cops look at me crazy when I tell them I'm not consenting to a search. I've had them go so far as to argue with me about why I should be letting them search my house no mention of any laws or anything just that I'm "making myself seem like I'm hiding something" because I will not let them in my house. But they had to leave and get off my property angry.
 
Last edited:
Honestly, this is proof that niggas sometimes give themselves more trouble than they need. My freshman year my friends got BAKED and were skunked out. We were in my room watching The Incredibles(I was doing laundry all day and they came into my room an were chillin' and shit. RA smelled the bud, called the cops. Cop asked permission to search my room(although he didn't need permission cuz it was on campus), but I didn't have any bud in my possession(thank God), and I'm like "yeah man, have at it." I made sure I told him about some tea bushes my mom sent me so he wouldn't think it was bud. Nigga lectures me about "watching the company you keep" and bounced.

These two niggas in my dorm talmbout how they woulda say "fuck no" and "you got a warrant" all this extra shit.

Like bruh, they PROBABLY would've just given you your kid anyways. Just take your fuckin' child and call it a day. Niggas videotapin', talkin' stupid shit, when they have no reason to.

Everybody think it's 1965, they in birmingham, and they with MLK. Nigga it's 2011, you in the suburbs, and you bring unnecessary shit on yourself for no fuckin' reason. THEY were fighting for a cause. Rest of these new niggas just fightin' to say they fightin'. Word to Jena 6.
 
Last edited:
[video=youtube;ZFzH5Oe-YL4]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFzH5Oe-YL4[/video]

Here's an example of a white guy tryna soapbox.

These people don't realize how stupid they look. It's not even clever trolling. It's just blatantly searching for attention.
 
Last edited:
im_lux;3060866 said:
As far as the search goes if what you're saying is all of it they didn't have a right to search you though most people consent to searches which gives them permission but you don't HAVE to. They have to have cause to search you...like if they seen you with something hanging out of your pocket or they maybe seen you putting out a blunt or even if you just "smell like weed" all of which would be a bit hard for you to argue in court.

And yeah once you give your name and they find you in the system they have all information through DMV files and criminal files that are on record.

And yeah there should most definately be some sort of minimum understanding of basic law and human rights that is above what they are supposed to know at this moment. In order to be a cop they learn a lot of what they can do but don't learn as much of what they cannot it seems. Then plus if everyone is letting them do it they start expecting it. Like cops look at me crazy when I tell them I'm not consenting to a search. I've had them go so far as to argue with me about why I should be letting them search my house no mention of any laws or anything just that I'm "making myself seem like I'm hiding something" because I will not let them in my house. But they had to leave and get off my property angry.

yeh man that was literally all that happened.....and they brought a whole van to me, like they were expecting me to pull guns on them or sumthing....back then i was younger though so i didnt really know what to do so i just let them harrass me while i had the sour face.......

what about giving my name? that shit right there pisses me off, like if a random guy comes up to me on road and orders me to tell him my name i have every right to tell them i aint telling you nothing whereas if i say that to a policeman/woman who had no reason to stop me in the first place they will tell me that my hesitance to give them a name is just cause for them to search me (which is what happened last time i got stopped).....so im walking on road...u think i look suspicious (for what i can only assume was a racial thing)....and you demand i give you information about myself otherwise u will have to search me.....maaaaaaan that is way off balance. its crazy how if your innocent and, try to argue your innocence to them you just seem more guilty.....we cant win out here
 
Last edited:
nigga reminded me of this

[video=youtube;TexL-eyZHzo]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TexL-eyZHzo[/video]
 
Last edited:
Idi Amin Dada;3060900 said:
Everybody think it's 1965, they in birmingham, and they with MLK. Nigga it's 2011, you in the suburbs, and you bring unnecessary shit on yourself for no fuckin' reason. THEY were fighting for a cause. Rest of these new niggas just fightin' to say they fightin'. Word to Jena 6.

man it aint even like that bruh...i aint tryna come at you like that cus ure obviously an educated/knowledgeable brother, and especially in this situation i dont know what im talking about in terms of law and rights....BUT!!!!!!!!
im sure at one point you hear the brother saying, usually he wouldnt step to police like that, but they took his son.....that was probably the straw that broke the camels back so to speak......i been there too, like i said before recently i had a "altercation" (for want of a better word) with police....and that was only because for the past ten years ive been getting stopped and have been "cool" about it....but there comes a time where enough is enough.....or atleast it makes you feel goo dto just let them know how you feel and maybe win just once......im sure that brother in the vieo felt mad liberated when the cops gave him his son and drove away humbled wether he owned them or not
 
Last edited:

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
75
Views
149
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…