Ex-WWE Diva Cameron Says That She Only Dates White Men

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Undefeatable;c-9777345 said:
konceptjones;c-9777325 said:
Undefeatable;c-9777313 said:
konceptjones;c-9777289 said:
and nothing of value was lost.

Care to explain this?

She made her choice. A black woman that dates strictly white men is of no value to Black America on a whole. Same for black men that date strictly white.

Nothing of value was lost here.

This is just dumb.

By this logic, we shouldn't give a damn when these blacks marry out, cause the very act of marrying out means that they weren't "of value."

If you are going to ever say that "nothing of value was lost," what is of value would have to be determined independently of the act of marrying out, or making a decision to do so.

Think about what you are saying b. A person could have every conceivable advantage -- wealth, education, good genes -- but if they decided they aren't fucking with us, then you'd say that they're "of no value." Now tell me, does that make any sense? Think about it.

in-living-color-o.gif


 
I think there would be a bit of an issue if I cared about her personal decisions. That would mean i have an issue. Which I dont. Go do whatever you do and dont bother me cause Its not my concern.
 
Last edited:
KingFreeman;c-9777378 said:
Undefeatable;c-9777345 said:
konceptjones;c-9777325 said:
Undefeatable;c-9777313 said:
konceptjones;c-9777289 said:
and nothing of value was lost.

Care to explain this?

She made her choice. A black woman that dates strictly white men is of no value to Black America on a whole. Same for black men that date strictly white.

Nothing of value was lost here.

This is just dumb.

By this logic, we shouldn't give a damn when these blacks marry out, cause the very act of marrying out means that they weren't "of value."

If you are going to ever say that "nothing of value was lost," what is of value would have to be determined independently of the act of marrying out, or making a decision to do so.

Think about what you are saying b. A person could have every conceivable advantage -- wealth, education, good genes -- but if they decided they aren't fucking with us, then you'd say that they're "of no value." Now tell me, does that make any sense? Think about it.

in-living-color-o.gif

And your point is? It's not like if what I said doesn't make perfect sense.

Saying " "nothing of value was lost" to blacks who marry out is a really dumb thing for pro-black blacks to say.
 
she a corn ball too. Let's see, she's black and worked for wwe; let me guess, they had her dancing and jobbed her out I bet.
 
Last edited:
Undefeatable;c-9777345 said:
konceptjones;c-9777325 said:
Undefeatable;c-9777313 said:
konceptjones;c-9777289 said:
and nothing of value was lost.

Care to explain this?

She made her choice. A black woman that dates strictly white men is of no value to Black America on a whole. Same for black men that date strictly white.

Nothing of value was lost here.

This is just dumb.

By this logic, we shouldn't give a damn when these blacks marry out, cause the very act of marrying out means that they weren't "of value."

If you are going to ever say that "nothing of value was lost," what is of value would have to be determined independently of the act of marrying out, or making a decision to do so.

Think about what you are saying b. A person could have every conceivable advantage -- wealth, education, good genes -- but if they decided they aren't fucking with us, then you'd say that they're "of no value." Now tell me, does that make any sense? Think about it.

Here's where you're wrong:

Typically a person that dates outside of their race, but not exclusively, still maintains their racial identity. If that person falls in love with and subsequently marries outside of their race they will generally raise their kids with an identity that encompasses both or, in the case where one parent is Black, a Black identity.

When a black person dates exclusively white, they usually disassociate themselves from their own blackness and impart that on their children.
 
konceptjones;c-9777451 said:
Undefeatable;c-9777345 said:
konceptjones;c-9777325 said:
Undefeatable;c-9777313 said:
konceptjones;c-9777289 said:
and nothing of value was lost.

Care to explain this?

She made her choice. A black woman that dates strictly white men is of no value to Black America on a whole. Same for black men that date strictly white.

Nothing of value was lost here.

This is just dumb.

By this logic, we shouldn't give a damn when these blacks marry out, cause the very act of marrying out means that they weren't "of value."

If you are going to ever say that "nothing of value was lost," what is of value would have to be determined independently of the act of marrying out, or making a decision to do so.

Think about what you are saying b. A person could have every conceivable advantage -- wealth, education, good genes -- but if they decided they aren't fucking with us, then you'd say that they're "of no value." Now tell me, does that make any sense? Think about it.

Here's where you're wrong:

Typically a person that dates outside of their race, but not exclusively, still maintains their racial identity. If that person falls in love with and subsequently marries outside of their race they will generally raise their kids with an identity that encompasses both or, in the case where one parent is Black, a Black identity.

When a black person dates exclusively white, they usually disassociate themselves from their own blackness and impart that on their children.

Ok, but these are general presumptions that, even if true more often than not, are not always true.

Anyway, I think that a black person with a weak or non-existent black identity who marries out and has bi-racial children does more harm than a black person with a weak or non-existent black identity who marries black and has black children. For one thing, the children might still get and maintain a black identity, whatever the preferences of the parents. There are other reasons too.

 
5th Letter;c-9777340 said:
As long as she's not throwing black men under the bus while propping up white men, then it is what it is.

This is exactly wrong.

Black people need a reason to date/marry out. That reason might be a fiction of their imagination, or of their limited experience, but it might not.

If the black people who dated/married out provided a reason, then if there is something to it maybe the other sex can take it as constructive criticism and try to change.

Nothing wrong with black women criticizing black men, or black men criticizing black women. In fact, that might be essential to the survival of the race.
 
konceptjones;c-9777487 said:
Copper;c-9777484 said:
Undefeatable in here sounding defeated as fuck...

He's taking it personally 'cause he's one of them cats that only dates white chicks.

This nigga cries in every thread about womens color preferences if he doesnt fall into the category
 
konceptjones;c-9777487 said:
Copper;c-9777484 said:
Undefeatable in here sounding defeated as fuck...

He's taking it personally 'cause he's one of them cats that only dates white chicks.

I don't see how you could reach this conclusion based on what I am saying. I am basically saying that we should be critical of her and people like her (who exclusively date/marry out), whereas you are saying that it's no big loss when people like her marry out.
 

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
85
Views
139
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…