Ebro responds Charlamagne Tha Cake Soap Gawd calling him a groupie on Joe Budden's Podcast...

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
He was mildly caught off guard and wasn't ready to deal with damage control or he didn't want to take the picture which I think is fine.

They need to have a one on one discussion to air out differences or stay out of each other's way.

CTG bout his views and clicks as he said on his podcast so I can see why he left it out. Doesn't really make a difference. Homie ain't wanna take a picture and homie don't fuck with you like that. End of story.

CTG would not have been there if it wasn't for Ebro? Did anyone catch that? I think Homie brought this on himself. You can't always 100% accurately predict the next mans behavior especially after dogging their name and rep.

Queue the Tony Montana clip....

TBH idk if I would've taken the picture without first having a conversation to air out everything respectfully.

Insert Scarface clip here press play...
 
Last edited:
soul rattler;c-9800909 said:
za'kiss;c-9800728 said:
Also, to whoever compared this to when Malcolm X put his differences with MLK aside to defend him against a white cop is completely off the rails. First of all, Ebro sure as hell ain't MLK. And second, if a cop was about to put his hands on Ebro, that's a completely different story. We're talking about a picture that is supposed to represent something false. Charlamagne ain't gotta stand for that. Especially in a social media age where it gets circulated everywhere and Charlamagne would constantly have to address it to explain how he didn't just validate the man who called him coon and who never apologized for it, which was his point on Joe Budden's podcast. Charlamagne is right about this one.


Malcolm X said there isn't a black person in America he doesn't have use for.

Give me the full quote.

soul rattler;c-9800909 said:
If Malcolm X can put differences aside, so can Charlemagne and Ebro. If it's possible for him in the 1960s, it's good enough for them in 2017.



The example given was a white cop about to put his hands on MLK. Completely different story.

And what's the big cause they are putting their differences aside for? What exactly is the picture supposed to accomplish other than the false representation that they are cool? It would be one thing if you had blacks getting shot up out in the streets and Ebro and Charlamagne had to come together to literally save lives. Let's not pretend this is that, even if that's how Ebro wants to play.

Both showed up at the event and did their thing. I don't see why Charlamagne had to take a picture with duke. It does more damage than good because it says "Yo I'm cool with this cat calling me a coon and not apologizing for it", which undermines Charlamagne's message, which was actually a good one.
 
Last edited:
za'kiss;c-9801583 said:
soul rattler;c-9800909 said:
za'kiss;c-9800728 said:
Also, to whoever compared this to when Malcolm X put his differences with MLK aside to defend him against a white cop is completely off the rails. First of all, Ebro sure as hell ain't MLK. And second, if a cop was about to put his hands on Ebro, that's a completely different story. We're talking about a picture that is supposed to represent something false. Charlamagne ain't gotta stand for that. Especially in a social media age where it gets circulated everywhere and Charlamagne would constantly have to address it to explain how he didn't just validate the man who called him coon and who never apologized for it, which was his point on Joe Budden's podcast. Charlamagne is right about this one.


Malcolm X said there isn't a black person in America he doesn't have use for.

Give me the full quote.

soul rattler;c-9800909 said:
If Malcolm X can put differences aside, so can Charlemagne and Ebro. If it's possible for him in the 1960s, it's good enough for them in 2017.



The example given was a white cop about to put his hands on MLK. Completely different story.

And what's the big cause they are putting their differences aside for? What exactly is the picture supposed to accomplish other than the false representation that they are cool? It would be one thing if you had blacks getting shot up out in the streets and Ebro and Charlamagne had to come together to literally save lives. Let's not pretend this is that, even if that's how Ebro wants to play.

Both showed up at the event and did their thing. I don't see why Charlamagne had to take a picture with duke. It does more damage than good because it says "Yo I'm cool with this cat calling me a coon and not apologizing for it", which undermines Charlamagne's message, which was actually a good one.

They not beefing over Charlamagne not taking the picture.. Ebro didn't even talk about it publicly until after Charlemagne went on Joes podcast fronting like Ebro was begging for a pic..
 
Last edited:
blackrain;c-9801286 said:
soul rattler;c-9800909 said:
za'kiss;c-9800728 said:
Also, to whoever compared this to when Malcolm X put his differences with MLK aside to defend him against a white cop is completely off the rails. First of all, Ebro sure as hell ain't MLK. And second, if a cop was about to put his hands on Ebro, that's a completely different story. We're talking about a picture that is supposed to represent something false. Charlamagne ain't gotta stand for that. Especially in a social media age where it gets circulated everywhere and Charlamagne would constantly have to address it to explain how he didn't just validate the man who called him coon and who never apologized for it, which was his point on Joe Budden's podcast. Charlamagne is right about this one.


Malcolm X said there isn't a black person in America he doesn't have use for.

If Malcolm X can put differences aside, so can Charlemagne and Ebro. If it's possible for him in the 1960s, it's good enough for them in 2017.

It also took time for him to get to that point...and everybody don't move at the same pace...plus ain't nobody obligated to forgive nobody. That's a personal decision you make

You're making two assumptions.

First, there is nothing that suggests that X had to mature to the point of speaking in support of King. From the jump, he was always there for black people, even if they weren't there for themselves.

Second, you don't have to forgive someone to put your differences to the side for a greater cause. To this day, I think X was justified in calling King a religious Uncle Tom. The leech-like effect that the black church has on black people, the devastating repercussions that intergration had on black economies, white privilege, etc all say that X was right. But just because you fundamentally disagree with someone doesn't mean you can't stand next to them for the greater good. And King never spoke ill of X.

Like I said, they did it in the midst of church bombings, dogs, fire hoses, and lynchings. But these two radio personalities can't take a fuckin picture together to show unity in opposition to the single worst president in American history? The fuck?
 
za'kiss;c-9801583 said:
soul rattler;c-9800909 said:
za'kiss;c-9800728 said:
Also, to whoever compared this to when Malcolm X put his differences with MLK aside to defend him against a white cop is completely off the rails. First of all, Ebro sure as hell ain't MLK. And second, if a cop was about to put his hands on Ebro, that's a completely different story. We're talking about a picture that is supposed to represent something false. Charlamagne ain't gotta stand for that. Especially in a social media age where it gets circulated everywhere and Charlamagne would constantly have to address it to explain how he didn't just validate the man who called him coon and who never apologized for it, which was his point on Joe Budden's podcast. Charlamagne is right about this one.


Malcolm X said there isn't a black person in America he doesn't have use for.

Give me the full quote.

soul rattler;c-9800909 said:
If Malcolm X can put differences aside, so can Charlemagne and Ebro. If it's possible for him in the 1960s, it's good enough for them in 2017.



The example given was a white cop about to put his hands on MLK. Completely different story.

And what's the big cause they are putting their differences aside for? What exactly is the picture supposed to accomplish other than the false representation that they are cool? It would be one thing if you had blacks getting shot up out in the streets and Ebro and Charlamagne had to come together to literally save lives. Let's not pretend this is that, even if that's how Ebro wants to play.

Both showed up at the event and did their thing. I don't see why Charlamagne had to take a picture with duke. It does more damage than good because it says "Yo I'm cool with this cat calling me a coon and not apologizing for it", which undermines Charlamagne's message, which was actually a good one.

A white reporter was interviewing Malcom X and quoted Thurgood Marshall saying there were some black people he, Thurgood, had no use for. X responded by saying that there isnt a black person in America that he doeant have use for.

The example wasn't just some random cop about to put hands on King. The example was X sending a wire to the police commissioner that if anything was to happen to King following a recent incident involving a black man being murdered, there would be reprecussions.
 
soul rattler;c-9801701 said:
Both showed up at the event and did their thing. I don't see why Charlamagne had to take a picture with duke. It does more damage than good because it says "Yo I'm cool with this cat calling me a coon and not apologizing for it", which undermines Charlamagne's message, which was actually a good one.

A white reporter was interviewing Malcom X and quoted Thurgood Marshall saying there were some black people he, Thurgood, had no use for. X responded by saying that there isnt a black person in America that he doeant have use for.

The example wasn't just some random cop about to put hands on King. The example was X sending a wire to the police commissioner that if anything was to happen to King following a recent incident involving a black man being murdered, there would be reprecussions.

Again, massive disanalogies here. Charlamagne isn't worried about Ebro's safety at the hands of white oppressors. Of course any black man should come to another black man's defense at the hands of the oppressor. That's not what this is. It's not that big.

The point is whether Ebro should get a pass for calling Charlamagne a coon. He shouldn't. By your logic, anybody can denigrate anyone else's character without consequence, but Malcolm X never stood for that. He's saying he will stand by his brother if violence is ever threatened against him. We aren't talking about violence against Ebro. We're talking about whether Charlamagne should validate his criticisms of him.
 
Last edited:
blackrain;c-9801284 said:
JokerzWyld;c-9800891 said:
Revolver Ocelot;c-9800562 said:
JokerzWyld;c-9800519 said:
I saw Ebro at the 10/10/15 event taking pics with people; it's what he does.

I think CTG was wrong in this situation. You can't have meetings with Tomi Lahren who disparages black organizations and try to son a black dude at a meeting for a black organization. That's foul IMO

How is CTG wrong for not taking a pic w/ a nigga he doesn't care for?

How ever you feel about him and that Tomi situation, that goddamn pic wasn't gonna change ur mind.

Y'all niggas in here acting like y'all cool wit every MF you ever met in your life. That event wasn't about CTG and Ebro mending fences, it was about rights or voting(idk).

What's funny is had it came out that CTG wanted to take a pic w/ Ebro y'all be calling him lame.

My point is this: he wasn't cool with Tomi, but he went on her show which added to her brand for better or worse. She never altered her position on the subject of black organizations but he decided to meet with her again anyway. That's inconsistent with how Ebro was treated at a meeting for a black organization. Ebro never mentioned the slight, he just let it be. Charlemagne mentioned the encounter for cool points.

If you disagree that's fine, but it's not consistent with his precepts on slave-mindedness.

Charlamagne mentioned the encounter because it came up as part of a conversation when Joe Budden asked him about him and Hot 97...and the Tomi shit you're looking at way out of context. There's a difference in not getting along w/ a radio personality, especially another black man, for saying you're a coon and then also wanting to take a picture with you like everything is good vs. telling a white woman that trying to compare Black Lives Matter protesting police violence is the same as the KKK. Those are 2 very different sets of circumstances

I would be inclined to believe this but for the fact that this story was told on the Joe Budden Podcast, a man who Charlemagne called a woman-beater. So this idea that you can't bury the hatchet with a dude you dissed is officially debunked.
 
Trillfate;c-9800739 said:
MeekMonizzLLLLLLe14;c-9800140 said:
(ob)Scene;c-9800125 said:
MeekMonizzLLLLLLe14;c-9800078 said:
Unless the photo would have ended police bias toward black people forever what is the point of the photo. It was dope they went to the know your rights event for the cause but a photo ain't gunna fix injustice.

Trump ain't gunna be like "I saw a great great photo of CTG and Ebro and i want all police to know the rights these black men have. Every police officer who has bias toward black men and women called me personally last night and will treat all people fairly for the cultre."

The event wasn't going to do any of that either. That's a small minded position to take.

It all just speaks towards the larger issue of male ego and pride. More specifically in the black/urban community.

Honestly Kap pisses me off because he doesn't fucking get it. He has these programs and shit but the nigga not even voting in his local election. The reason Ferguson had the issues with the police and the justice system out there is cause in a mostly black area niggas ain't vote.

You sound like a parrot

Niggas can say shit like that but offer no proof. The #1 right you have over the age of 18 is to vote for who runs the local shit in their community. Kap on anyone who questions my logic is an idiot.
 
I REALLY GET BOTH SIDES OF THE ISSUE...

EBRO EXTENDED THE OLIVE BRANCH BY INVITING HIM THERE....

C THA GOD ON SOME "WE DON'T HAVE TO BE FRIENDS TO COEXIST" SHIT...

THEY NEED TO SIT DOWN AND STOP ACTING LIKE HOES...
 
Lol. Ebro wants to be CTG so bad. CTG knows this so he doesnt even mention this nigga's existence or takes pictures with him. This nigga Ebro been WAITING for a back & forth with Charlamagne so he can get some publicity from it. In reality, CTG is just better & smarter than anybody at hot97
 
Last edited:
I don't really see where CtG is wrong in this to be honest. I've heard Ebro go at CtG before. His comments aren't just light jabs. He spent like half an hour once misrepresenting CtG's intentions and actions with Tomi and then repeatedly called him a coon over it. That's not just competitive banter. Those are personal attacks. Why would CtG want to take a pic with Ebro under any circumstances? Ebro's reason for wanting the pic doesn't matter. If you know you're burned bridges with a person, you shouldn't even expect to do that kinda shit with them. And if that person tells you "No" once, you just have to let it go.

To me, it does seem like jealousy. Hot 97 might be the bigger station, but the Breakfast Club is bigger than Ebro and Rosenberg's show, and at this point CtG is a bigger name than either of them. You can tell it bothers them. Like CtG said, them dudes actually get upset with guests that go to the BC before them. They've brought it up in interviews before. That's some bitch shit.
 
J-GUTTA;c-9801360 said:
Peezy_Jenkins;c-9800762 said:
Did y'all hear Rosenberg of all people say in the background "only suckas need security"

Lmao bitch

Man everyone knows that's Wax. He put his peoples ain't nothing wrong with that. CTG knows he pisses off fragile egos constantly and has been approached.

Either way I think their both entertaining. CTG is funny as fuck and BI is my favorite podcast. Ebro been killing it with interviews lately too.

Nah I got no problem with ctg having it or telling rappers to get security, that's smart

It was hilarious to hear Rosenberg say that tho knowing he'd run faster from confrontation than ctg ever has lol
 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
72
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…