Don't Listen To Obama. The War On Terror Is Far From Over

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
ccsu_crawford_brother_04.jpg
 
Makaveli Joker;491914 said:
Don't listen to Obama and ignore Al Queda. They are far from done. Remember the Bengazi attacks last year? spontaneous my ass. Either Obama thinks we are all goddamn idiots, or he is a member of Al Queda. What's gonna happen when Obama leaves this country open to another 9/11 attack or worse? I truly believe we are fucked with Obama in office and his soft on terrorism act.

Drones is all I gotta say , you keep talking shit Obama might one fly by ya crib dig
 
MC The Rapper;5577575 said:
Makaveli Joker;491914 said:
Don't listen to Obama and ignore Al Queda. They are far from done. Remember the Bengazi attacks last year? spontaneous my ass. Either Obama thinks we are all goddamn idiots, or he is a member of Al Queda. What's gonna happen when Obama leaves this country open to another 9/11 attack or worse? I truly believe we are fucked with Obama in office and his soft on terrorism act.

Drones is all I gotta say , you keep talking shit Obama might one fly by ya crib dig

So Bush gets chewed out for water boarding terrorists, but its okay for drones to kill americans, ok.
 
Makaveli Joker;5577651 said:
MC The Rapper;5577575 said:
Makaveli Joker;491914 said:
Don't listen to Obama and ignore Al Queda. They are far from done. Remember the Bengazi attacks last year? spontaneous my ass. Either Obama thinks we are all goddamn idiots, or he is a member of Al Queda. What's gonna happen when Obama leaves this country open to another 9/11 attack or worse? I truly believe we are fucked with Obama in office and his soft on terrorism act.

Drones is all I gotta say , you keep talking shit Obama might one fly by ya crib dig

So Bush gets chewed out for water boarding terrorists, but its okay for drones to kill americans, ok.

Those bitches that got taken out weren't American. They denounced their citizenship live on TV and planned against fellow Americans. How you on here calling out Obama when he stay taking out top targets with drone strikes? Bush couldn't even lay hands on anybody that actually expressly stated that they were terrorist as opposed to killing people cuz they disrespected his daddy.
 
Last edited:
I'm no fan of Obama but the LAST thing I'd say is that he's being soft on terrorism......Obama has a pretty high body count by now, children included. It takes a lot of balls to blow people up all the time knowing kids will probably be blown up too. And many little kids are dead cuz of Obama. Soft is a strong word.
 
FuriousOne;5578141 said:
How you on here calling out Obama when he stay taking out top targets with drone strikes?
the question probably has a little to do with "where is this drone use going from here?" if Obama thinks the drone policy he uses can't be trusted in the hands of a president who's not him, there's something wrong with the policy.
 
janklow;5579653 said:
FuriousOne;5578141 said:
How you on here calling out Obama when he stay taking out top targets with drone strikes?
the question probably has a little to do with "where is this drone use going from here?" if Obama thinks the drone policy he uses can't be trusted in the hands of a president who's not him, there's something wrong with the policy.

What makes you think Obama wouldn't trust the use of drones with another president? Didn't he support President Bush's use of drones?
 
http://www.policymic.com/articles/2...killed-by-drone-strikes-in-pakistan-and-yemen

A List Of Children Killed By Drone Strikes In Pakistan and Yemen

A recent Marine Times article ran the alarming headline “Some Afghan kids aren’t bystanders” on December 3, reporting on the death of three children in Afghanistan. They were apparently targeted by a U.S. military drone because they appeared to be digging a hole in a road.

Army Lt. Col. Marion Carrington, quoted in the article, said that “It kind of opens our aperture” that children are being used in the conflict. “In addition to looking for military-age males, it’s looking for children with potential hostile intent.”

Proponents of the drone war, including President Barack Obama, claim that drone strikes are precise and only target terrorists. A study, however, from Columbia Law School’s Human Rights Institute finds that the number of Pakistani civilians killed in drone strikes “significantly and consistently underestimated" and that as many as 98% of those killed by drone strikes are civilians.

While it is ultimately impossible to get exact numbers, this means that for every "terrorist" killed by a drone strike, anywhere between 10 and 50 civilians are killed.

Obama has authorized 193 drone strikes in Pakistan – four times the amount authorized by George W. Bush. According to Global Research, over the past 4 years Obama has authorized attacks in Pakistan which have killed more than 800 innocent civilians and just 22 Al-Qaeda officers.

---Obama is more bloodthirsty a warlord than any gang banger or Mafia hitman. He's not soft by any means.
 
Last edited:
kingblaze84;5580097 said:
http://www.policymic.com/articles/24164/a-list-of-children-killed-by-drone-strikes-in-pakistan-and-yemen

A List Of Children Killed By Drone Strikes In Pakistan and Yemen

A recent Marine Times article ran the alarming headline “Some Afghan kids aren’t bystanders” on December 3, reporting on the death of three children in Afghanistan. They were apparently targeted by a U.S. military drone because they appeared to be digging a hole in a road.

Army Lt. Col. Marion Carrington, quoted in the article, said that “It kind of opens our aperture” that children are being used in the conflict. “In addition to looking for military-age males, it’s looking for children with potential hostile intent.”

Proponents of the drone war, including President Barack Obama, claim that drone strikes are precise and only target terrorists. A study, however, from Columbia Law School’s Human Rights Institute finds that the number of Pakistani civilians killed in drone strikes “significantly and consistently underestimated" and that as many as 98% of those killed by drone strikes are civilians.

While it is ultimately impossible to get exact numbers, this means that for every "terrorist" killed by a drone strike, anywhere between 10 and 50 civilians are killed.

Obama has authorized 193 drone strikes in Pakistan – four times the amount authorized by George W. Bush. According to Global Research, over the past 4 years Obama has authorized attacks in Pakistan which have killed more than 800 innocent civilians and just 22 Al-Qaeda officers.

---Obama is more bloodthirsty a warlord than any gang banger or Mafia hitman. He's not soft by any means.

Bush's body count is much higher, but he gets chewed out for being too aggressive. You tell me the hypocrisy with the American people between the two presidents.
 
Makaveli Joker;5580287 said:
kingblaze84;5580097 said:
http://www.policymic.com/articles/24164/a-list-of-children-killed-by-drone-strikes-in-pakistan-and-yemen

A List Of Children Killed By Drone Strikes In Pakistan and Yemen

A recent Marine Times article ran the alarming headline “Some Afghan kids aren’t bystanders” on December 3, reporting on the death of three children in Afghanistan. They were apparently targeted by a U.S. military drone because they appeared to be digging a hole in a road.

Army Lt. Col. Marion Carrington, quoted in the article, said that “It kind of opens our aperture” that children are being used in the conflict. “In addition to looking for military-age males, it’s looking for children with potential hostile intent.”

Proponents of the drone war, including President Barack Obama, claim that drone strikes are precise and only target terrorists. A study, however, from Columbia Law School’s Human Rights Institute finds that the number of Pakistani civilians killed in drone strikes “significantly and consistently underestimated" and that as many as 98% of those killed by drone strikes are civilians.

While it is ultimately impossible to get exact numbers, this means that for every "terrorist" killed by a drone strike, anywhere between 10 and 50 civilians are killed.

Obama has authorized 193 drone strikes in Pakistan – four times the amount authorized by George W. Bush. According to Global Research, over the past 4 years Obama has authorized attacks in Pakistan which have killed more than 800 innocent civilians and just 22 Al-Qaeda officers.

---Obama is more bloodthirsty a warlord than any gang banger or Mafia hitman. He's not soft by any means.

Bush's body count is much higher, but he gets chewed out for being too aggressive. You tell me the hypocrisy with the American people between the two presidents.

How is it Hypocrisy when Bush's body count is random as fuck. There weren't any strategic targets like the kill list which is actually put together with various intelligence agencies taking part with valid high ranking terrorist targets getting taking out, it was kill the entire country and sort it out later. The only high ranking targets bush took out was a regime that had nothing to do with 9/11.

Let's be honest here folks, kids may have died with drone attacks, but with the larger missile strikes, entire villages died. If terrorist stop planning and commuting to their attacks on children on English buses, Spanish trains, and in Muslim markets, maybe they wouldn't have to worry about drone strikes. At this point, they have no moral ground to stand on at which they had valid concerns about western powers previously.
 
Last edited:
After reading this, you will finally know why All Hip Hop.com is " dangerous ". America is fighting God in the War On Terror. First point: When majority of this country say they are Christian and servants of God, then the Old Testament spells out exactly what is going on in the world. Book of Leviticus, Chapter 26, verses 14-16 are consequenses disobeying sacred Scriptures. Second and final point: After reading those parts in Leviticus, it will lead you to the actual consequenses---one of which is in title of this topic. What does the U.S. label those opponents in this global war ?
 
Makaveli Joker;5580287 said:
kingblaze84;5580097 said:
http://www.policymic.com/articles/24164/a-list-of-children-killed-by-drone-strikes-in-pakistan-and-yemen

A List Of Children Killed By Drone Strikes In Pakistan and Yemen

A recent Marine Times article ran the alarming headline “Some Afghan kids aren’t bystanders” on December 3, reporting on the death of three children in Afghanistan. They were apparently targeted by a U.S. military drone because they appeared to be digging a hole in a road.

Army Lt. Col. Marion Carrington, quoted in the article, said that “It kind of opens our aperture” that children are being used in the conflict. “In addition to looking for military-age males, it’s looking for children with potential hostile intent.”

Proponents of the drone war, including President Barack Obama, claim that drone strikes are precise and only target terrorists. A study, however, from Columbia Law School’s Human Rights Institute finds that the number of Pakistani civilians killed in drone strikes “significantly and consistently underestimated" and that as many as 98% of those killed by drone strikes are civilians.

While it is ultimately impossible to get exact numbers, this means that for every "terrorist" killed by a drone strike, anywhere between 10 and 50 civilians are killed.

Obama has authorized 193 drone strikes in Pakistan – four times the amount authorized by George W. Bush. According to Global Research, over the past 4 years Obama has authorized attacks in Pakistan which have killed more than 800 innocent civilians and just 22 Al-Qaeda officers.

---Obama is more bloodthirsty a warlord than any gang banger or Mafia hitman. He's not soft by any means.

Bush's body count is much higher, but he gets chewed out for being too aggressive. You tell me the hypocrisy with the American people between the two presidents.

In this regard I agree, Obama supporters who hate Bush for his war loving ways give Obama praise or a pass for his bloodthirsty ways himself. I've said it once and I'll say it again, there is ZERO difference between Obama supporters and Bush supporters. Both love bloodshed and both don't have a single clue to stop the (righteous) anger many feel towards the United States. When I hear an Obama fan diss Bush, I laugh and say you're just the same as Bush. Maybe not AS bloodthirsty as Bush, but Barack "baby killer" Obama is not much better.

Peace called, it wants its Nobel Prize back.
 
Last edited:

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
24
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…