Do you think there should be a law implemented..

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
There is no problem of overpopulation, this is a popular misconception. You could fit every man woman and child in australia and every family could have their own acre of land. The problem is not one of overpopulation, it is primarily one of means, and secondarily one of responsibility. If you have the means to provide for your brood, and are fully responsible for them independent of the state, you should be free to have as many children as possible.

I think the state has no place in controlling an individual's reproductive liberty...unless they become a burden on the state. So I think that people with children on welfare should be on mandatory birth control (no sterilizations), and abortions be limited to two (3rd abortion = mandatory sterilization).
 
Last edited:
it would have to be a global thing not just a USA thing for it to work. I would cape it for 2 children
 
Last edited:
Lincoln;3981085 said:
That's not getting rid of the problem, we are still living unsustainable lifestyles.

This right here, the amount of resources we use in the world is beyond extreme.

But its still way too many fucking people on this planet. At this point I feel like I should I get a special tax break for not having kids yet
 
Last edited:
Tommy bilfiger;3981049 said:
NO

A law should be implemented to ship out Every illegal alien and their wetbacced babies that would clear at least 15-20 mil in space

If you havent graduated college wit a minimum Bachelors degree and have babies then u should be jailed for 5 years and your child should be institutionalized

Mexicans are destroying the usa

What the hot fuck?

I hope you're playing on that part.
 
Last edited:
If you leave a cup under a leaky faucet for long enough, the cup will eventually overflow. Solutions are easy....change often isn't.
 
Last edited:
The 1 child law in China have resulted in there being a disproportionate amount of men vs women.

In theory it would be a good idea, but in real life it doesn't work. I think education is the answer. The whole system needs an overhaul, the way it is now the dumb and poor and getting dumber and poorer and the rich and educated are becoming more rich an educated.

The sad reality is though, no matter what laws are in place dumb ignorant bastards will still exist, and breed.
 
Last edited:
people are gonna fuck either way it goes....whether a kid comes out of that or not, i dont think many care anymore....i dont think a law would help this in any good way
 
Last edited:
Yeah having children shouldn't be allowed if you can't afford it. Or better yet, since disallowing it would be some kind of human rights issue, it should just not be supported/enforced by the gov't.
 
Last edited:
Uncle Kingpin;3982998 said:
There is no problem of overpopulation, this is a popular misconception. You could fit every man woman and child in australia and every family could have their own acre of land. The problem is not one of overpopulation, it is primarily one of means, and secondarily one of responsibility. If you have the means to provide for your brood, and are fully responsible for them independent of the state, you should be free to have as many children as possible.
I think the state has no place in controlling an individual's reproductive liberty...unless they become a burden on the state. So I think that people with children on welfare should be on mandatory birth control (no sterilizations), and abortions be limited to two (3rd abortion = mandatory sterilization).

word, ive driven cross country 3 times, trust me when i say there is nothing out there. millions of uninhabited acres.
 
Last edited:
Uncle Kingpin;3982998 said:
There is no problem of overpopulation, this is a popular misconception. You could fit every man woman and child in australia and every family could have their own acre of land. The problem is not one of overpopulation, it is primarily one of means, and secondarily one of responsibility. If you have the means to provide for your brood, and are fully responsible for them independent of the state, you should be free to have as many children as possible.

I think the state has no place in controlling an individual's reproductive liberty...unless they become a burden on the state. So I think that people with children on welfare should be on mandatory birth control (no sterilizations), and abortions be limited to two (3rd abortion = mandatory sterilization).

OMG this stupid it requires more than an anchor of land to sustain one human being.

I use to work for the world bank they are already doing models for water wars that might happen

in 40 yrs,because since china and Africa are growing so fast we might run out of fresh water

we have alot salt water but 97% of it is not drinkable because its salt water.

plus all the materials and minerals that go into making products that make are life

easy are limited. look at the price of oil the reason with so high is because. the reason why gas is 4.00

is because you have billions of ppl in china who wanna drive cars.

its not about land space its about resources. dude
 
Last edited:
China also forces their imprisoned to work in factories and kills them when they can't work. Regardless of the infraction. Let's start doing that too. I admit that population is growing very rapidly, but until population outpaces technology....this is a moot point.
 
Last edited:
jusdre313;3981033 said:
i think we should.. hasnt China alrdy started this there.. i thought i remember hearing something about this.. (could be worng but i dont think so) but it wont happen people want to keep

having kids REGARDLESS if they can even take care of them so global pollution, global warming are the least of their concerns

China would also murder your first born if it wasn't a male...and bind your daughter's feet together to ensure that she never had bigger feet than a man...you go ahead and follow their child regulations...
 
Last edited:
Also the problem isn't overpopulation as much as it is misuse and just being plain greedy when it comes to how we use resources
 
Last edited:
politicalthug202;3986310 said:
OMG this stupid it requires more than an anchor of land to sustain one human being.

I use to work for the world bank they are already doing models for water wars that might happen

in 40 yrs,because since china and Africa are growing so fast we might run out of fresh water

we have alot salt water but 97% of it is not drinkable because its salt water.

plus all the materials and minerals that go into making products that make are life

easy are limited. look at the price of oil the reason with so high is because. the reason why gas is 4.00

is because you have billions of ppl in china who wanna drive cars.

its not about land space its about resources. dude

Judging by your poor grammar, I don't think you are in a position to call anyone else stupid. I made a valid point that we are not lacking in space to put 7 billion people. The earth could comfortably support billions more. It doesnt take any "anchors" to support human beings buddy. Water, like any other resource, is abundant. The problem is that it is artificially made scarce by big multinational corporations. Let me ask you a question...where does water go once it's used? Does the water disappear into space, never to be seen again? Go google waste water reclamation, water desalination, water conservation etc.

And as for the price of gas, do you really blame some chinaman in shenzen for 4.00 gas? Gas is the price it is because of oil futures i.e. traders making the cost go up artificially. Saudi Arabia charges $40 for a barrel, traders are currently selling it for $100. And btw, the World Bank/IMF has probably done the most to keep 3rd world countries impoverished so I wouldnt consider them a trustworthy source by any means.
 
Last edited:
By 2050 it's estimated we will be at 9 billion people, and the rush for alternative fuels and energy is heavy.

China also forces their imprisoned to work in factories and kills them when they can't work. Regardless of the infraction. Let's start doing that too. I admit that population is growing very rapidly, but until population outpaces technology....this is a moot point.

To be honest, sounds like a good idea.
 
Last edited:
China has already started doing this. I blame Hispanics for the uptick. Not that i have anything against them but the average Hispanic woman has 4 plus kids.
 
Last edited:

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
35
Views
2
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…