DafuqYo;6508059 said:twatgetta;6508006 said:To find out WHY things like this keep happening, you have to consider the source, and apology will never happen. WHY?? because of this jew-ish basturd devil goat worshippin' motherfucker right here most likely green-lighted it.
COSTCO, Owner and founder....Craig Jelinek....
But the Jews are Gods chosen people.
EmperorRises;6508598 said:
MansaMusa67;6508586 said:DafuqYo;6508570 said:
The burden of proof is upon u sir...
If u provide anything of substance and then I'll look onto it....
Until then....
DafuqYo;6508625 said:MansaMusa67;6508586 said:DafuqYo;6508570 said:
The burden of proof is upon u sir...
If u provide anything of substance and then I'll look onto it....
Until then....
The resurrection of Jesus is a hoax because Mark, the earliest gospel, never contained the story. The “resurrection” passages were later added to Mark, and his gospel was changed by Matthew and Luke, the Gospel writers are anonymous. It was necessary for Matthew and Luke to change Mark according to their own understanding, they also relied upon the Q source. Regarding the Gospel of John, it’s completely different and draws upon ambiguous sources. The oldest manuscripts of the New Testament are Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, both of these Greek manuscripts have no ending for Mark!
I said Matthew earlier but I'm human and sometimes we make mistakes retelling stories. Lol
Trillfate;6508608 said:
Premeer;6508636 said:DafuqYo;6508625 said:MansaMusa67;6508586 said:DafuqYo;6508570 said:
The burden of proof is upon u sir...
If u provide anything of substance and then I'll look onto it....
Until then....
The resurrection of Jesus is a hoax because Mark, the earliest gospel, never contained the story. The “resurrection” passages were later added to Mark, and his gospel was changed by Matthew and Luke, the Gospel writers are anonymous. It was necessary for Matthew and Luke to change Mark according to their own understanding, they also relied upon the Q source. Regarding the Gospel of John, it’s completely different and draws upon ambiguous sources. The oldest manuscripts of the New Testament are Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, both of these Greek manuscripts have no ending for Mark!
I said Matthew earlier but I'm human and sometimes we make mistakes retelling stories. Lol
LOL where did you read this deception from.
link to the site. theres lies all throughout the internet trying to attack the credibility of the Bible, trying to claim Jesus was made up / plagiarism, and God is not real.. lies all over the place.. but people love to latch on to them just because.
DafuqYo;6508688 said:Premeer;6508636 said:DafuqYo;6508625 said:MansaMusa67;6508586 said:DafuqYo;6508570 said:
The burden of proof is upon u sir...
If u provide anything of substance and then I'll look onto it....
Until then....
The resurrection of Jesus is a hoax because Mark, the earliest gospel, never contained the story. The “resurrection” passages were later added to Mark, and his gospel was changed by Matthew and Luke, the Gospel writers are anonymous. It was necessary for Matthew and Luke to change Mark according to their own understanding, they also relied upon the Q source. Regarding the Gospel of John, it’s completely different and draws upon ambiguous sources. The oldest manuscripts of the New Testament are Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, both of these Greek manuscripts have no ending for Mark!
I said Matthew earlier but I'm human and sometimes we make mistakes retelling stories. Lol
LOL where did you read this deception from.
link to the site. theres lies all throughout the internet trying to attack the credibility of the Bible, trying to claim Jesus was made up / plagiarism, and God is not real.. lies all over the place.. but people love to latch on to them just because.
Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, look into it. That's all I can tell you. Believe what you what. It's true though.
_DUB_;6507713 said:
Premeer;6508698 said:DafuqYo;6508688 said:Premeer;6508636 said:DafuqYo;6508625 said:MansaMusa67;6508586 said:DafuqYo;6508570 said:
The burden of proof is upon u sir...
If u provide anything of substance and then I'll look onto it....
Until then....
The resurrection of Jesus is a hoax because Mark, the earliest gospel, never contained the story. The “resurrection” passages were later added to Mark, and his gospel was changed by Matthew and Luke, the Gospel writers are anonymous. It was necessary for Matthew and Luke to change Mark according to their own understanding, they also relied upon the Q source. Regarding the Gospel of John, it’s completely different and draws upon ambiguous sources. The oldest manuscripts of the New Testament are Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, both of these Greek manuscripts have no ending for Mark!
I said Matthew earlier but I'm human and sometimes we make mistakes retelling stories. Lol
LOL where did you read this deception from.
link to the site. theres lies all throughout the internet trying to attack the credibility of the Bible, trying to claim Jesus was made up / plagiarism, and God is not real.. lies all over the place.. but people love to latch on to them just because.
Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, look into it. That's all I can tell you. Believe what you what. It's true though.
i was also told to look into the greek mythology gods ie. horus, etc.. then i did just to prove that the person who told me about it was deceived and didnt properly do his research.. so i did a quick google search and all the lies was laid out on 1 page...
same situation here.. "look into, etc etc.. thats all i can tell you"... so you want to me pin-point the lies and the source of the lies you are spreading?
heres what i want YOU to do @dafuqyo ... i want you to go look more into that information.. do a little research on WHO the source of this information is.. then do some quick searches about the source of this lie.. and you will ALWAYS see the source is a satanic worshipper out for an agenda.. satanic worshippers that worship a power they cant physically see, but spread lies about God and Jesus because, "they cant physically see them"... this is the truth. they lie. satan has todays world by the strings.
DafuqYo;6508728 said:Premeer;6508698 said:DafuqYo;6508688 said:Premeer;6508636 said:DafuqYo;6508625 said:MansaMusa67;6508586 said:DafuqYo;6508570 said:
The burden of proof is upon u sir...
If u provide anything of substance and then I'll look onto it....
Until then....
The resurrection of Jesus is a hoax because Mark, the earliest gospel, never contained the story. The “resurrection” passages were later added to Mark, and his gospel was changed by Matthew and Luke, the Gospel writers are anonymous. It was necessary for Matthew and Luke to change Mark according to their own understanding, they also relied upon the Q source. Regarding the Gospel of John, it’s completely different and draws upon ambiguous sources. The oldest manuscripts of the New Testament are Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, both of these Greek manuscripts have no ending for Mark!
I said Matthew earlier but I'm human and sometimes we make mistakes retelling stories. Lol
LOL where did you read this deception from.
link to the site. theres lies all throughout the internet trying to attack the credibility of the Bible, trying to claim Jesus was made up / plagiarism, and God is not real.. lies all over the place.. but people love to latch on to them just because.
Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, look into it. That's all I can tell you. Believe what you what. It's true though.
i was also told to look into the greek mythology gods ie. horus, etc.. then i did just to prove that the person who told me about it was deceived and didnt properly do his research.. so i did a quick google search and all the lies was laid out on 1 page...
same situation here.. "look into, etc etc.. thats all i can tell you"... so you want to me pin-point the lies and the source of the lies you are spreading?
heres what i want YOU to do @dafuqyo ... i want you to go look more into that information.. do a little research on WHO the source of this information is.. then do some quick searches about the source of this lie.. and you will ALWAYS see the source is a satanic worshipper out for an agenda.. satanic worshippers that worship a power they cant physically see, but spread lies about God and Jesus because, "they cant physically see them"... this is the truth. they lie. satan has todays world by the strings.
Lol proof.
Premeer;6508755 said:DafuqYo;6508728 said:Premeer;6508698 said:DafuqYo;6508688 said:Premeer;6508636 said:DafuqYo;6508625 said:MansaMusa67;6508586 said:DafuqYo;6508570 said:
The burden of proof is upon u sir...
If u provide anything of substance and then I'll look onto it....
Until then....
The resurrection of Jesus is a hoax because Mark, the earliest gospel, never contained the story. The “resurrection” passages were later added to Mark, and his gospel was changed by Matthew and Luke, the Gospel writers are anonymous. It was necessary for Matthew and Luke to change Mark according to their own understanding, they also relied upon the Q source. Regarding the Gospel of John, it’s completely different and draws upon ambiguous sources. The oldest manuscripts of the New Testament are Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, both of these Greek manuscripts have no ending for Mark!
I said Matthew earlier but I'm human and sometimes we make mistakes retelling stories. Lol
LOL where did you read this deception from.
link to the site. theres lies all throughout the internet trying to attack the credibility of the Bible, trying to claim Jesus was made up / plagiarism, and God is not real.. lies all over the place.. but people love to latch on to them just because.
Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, look into it. That's all I can tell you. Believe what you what. It's true though.
i was also told to look into the greek mythology gods ie. horus, etc.. then i did just to prove that the person who told me about it was deceived and didnt properly do his research.. so i did a quick google search and all the lies was laid out on 1 page...
same situation here.. "look into, etc etc.. thats all i can tell you"... so you want to me pin-point the lies and the source of the lies you are spreading?
heres what i want YOU to do @dafuqyo ... i want you to go look more into that information.. do a little research on WHO the source of this information is.. then do some quick searches about the source of this lie.. and you will ALWAYS see the source is a satanic worshipper out for an agenda.. satanic worshippers that worship a power they cant physically see, but spread lies about God and Jesus because, "they cant physically see them"... this is the truth. they lie. satan has todays world by the strings.
Lol proof.
go here and read. just an example of a lie is being linked to a satanist.
http://community.allhiphop.com/disc...sus-not-plagiarized-dont-be-ridiculous#latest
[SIDE NOTE: i fully expect you to ignore this]
DafuqYo;6508771 said:Premeer;6508755 said:DafuqYo;6508728 said:Premeer;6508698 said:DafuqYo;6508688 said:Premeer;6508636 said:DafuqYo;6508625 said:MansaMusa67;6508586 said:DafuqYo;6508570 said:
The burden of proof is upon u sir...
If u provide anything of substance and then I'll look onto it....
Until then....
The resurrection of Jesus is a hoax because Mark, the earliest gospel, never contained the story. The “resurrection” passages were later added to Mark, and his gospel was changed by Matthew and Luke, the Gospel writers are anonymous. It was necessary for Matthew and Luke to change Mark according to their own understanding, they also relied upon the Q source. Regarding the Gospel of John, it’s completely different and draws upon ambiguous sources. The oldest manuscripts of the New Testament are Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, both of these Greek manuscripts have no ending for Mark!
I said Matthew earlier but I'm human and sometimes we make mistakes retelling stories. Lol
LOL where did you read this deception from.
link to the site. theres lies all throughout the internet trying to attack the credibility of the Bible, trying to claim Jesus was made up / plagiarism, and God is not real.. lies all over the place.. but people love to latch on to them just because.
Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, look into it. That's all I can tell you. Believe what you what. It's true though.
i was also told to look into the greek mythology gods ie. horus, etc.. then i did just to prove that the person who told me about it was deceived and didnt properly do his research.. so i did a quick google search and all the lies was laid out on 1 page...
same situation here.. "look into, etc etc.. thats all i can tell you"... so you want to me pin-point the lies and the source of the lies you are spreading?
heres what i want YOU to do @dafuqyo ... i want you to go look more into that information.. do a little research on WHO the source of this information is.. then do some quick searches about the source of this lie.. and you will ALWAYS see the source is a satanic worshipper out for an agenda.. satanic worshippers that worship a power they cant physically see, but spread lies about God and Jesus because, "they cant physically see them"... this is the truth. they lie. satan has todays world by the strings.
Lol proof.
go here and read. just an example of a lie is being linked to a satanist.
http://community.allhiphop.com/disc...sus-not-plagiarized-dont-be-ridiculous#latest
[SIDE NOTE: i fully expect you to ignore this]
That has nothing to with this conversation. Prove that the resurrection wasn't added to the Bible since that's what you believe.
http://carm.org/manuscript-evidenceDafuqYo;6508092 said:
Premeer;6508800 said:DafuqYo;6508771 said:Premeer;6508755 said:DafuqYo;6508728 said:Premeer;6508698 said:DafuqYo;6508688 said:Premeer;6508636 said:DafuqYo;6508625 said:MansaMusa67;6508586 said:DafuqYo;6508570 said:
The burden of proof is upon u sir...
If u provide anything of substance and then I'll look onto it....
Until then....
The resurrection of Jesus is a hoax because Mark, the earliest gospel, never contained the story. The “resurrection” passages were later added to Mark, and his gospel was changed by Matthew and Luke, the Gospel writers are anonymous. It was necessary for Matthew and Luke to change Mark according to their own understanding, they also relied upon the Q source. Regarding the Gospel of John, it’s completely different and draws upon ambiguous sources. The oldest manuscripts of the New Testament are Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, both of these Greek manuscripts have no ending for Mark!
I said Matthew earlier but I'm human and sometimes we make mistakes retelling stories. Lol
LOL where did you read this deception from.
link to the site. theres lies all throughout the internet trying to attack the credibility of the Bible, trying to claim Jesus was made up / plagiarism, and God is not real.. lies all over the place.. but people love to latch on to them just because.
Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus, look into it. That's all I can tell you. Believe what you what. It's true though.
i was also told to look into the greek mythology gods ie. horus, etc.. then i did just to prove that the person who told me about it was deceived and didnt properly do his research.. so i did a quick google search and all the lies was laid out on 1 page...
same situation here.. "look into, etc etc.. thats all i can tell you"... so you want to me pin-point the lies and the source of the lies you are spreading?
heres what i want YOU to do @dafuqyo ... i want you to go look more into that information.. do a little research on WHO the source of this information is.. then do some quick searches about the source of this lie.. and you will ALWAYS see the source is a satanic worshipper out for an agenda.. satanic worshippers that worship a power they cant physically see, but spread lies about God and Jesus because, "they cant physically see them"... this is the truth. they lie. satan has todays world by the strings.
Lol proof.
go here and read. just an example of a lie is being linked to a satanist.
http://community.allhiphop.com/disc...sus-not-plagiarized-dont-be-ridiculous#latest
[SIDE NOTE: i fully expect you to ignore this]
That has nothing to with this conversation. Prove that the resurrection wasn't added to the Bible since that's what you believe.
i dont have to prove anything.
but ill say this..
do you realize how EASY it is to make up lies like this 1 just to attack the credibility of the Bible? and Jesus?
were you alive 2000 years ago? were you alive 1,900 years ago when they say this lie was made up?
its so easy to make up lies about history.. even easier when the history is a couple thousand years ago.
you can say ANYTHING about the past and then tell somebody to prove you are wrong. its a joke. they are even saying we are products of aliens and aliens rule us.. then to people who oppose it, they just say, prove me wrong.
mario and luigi were originally from a far away galaxy that were placed here in the mid 8th century. theres top secret documents about them that nobody knows where they are. they were sent here to save a princess from a giant like lizard. that whole game is based on actual events. oh you think im lying? prove me wrong.
but about my link, thats an example of a lie being dissected and the source of the lie being linked to a satanist.
VIBE;6508573 said: