DO YOU "ACCEPT" PEOPLE COMING OUT? WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON THAT LIFE?

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Raging Raven;5762773 said:
Tebow was never bashed for being a Christian he was bashed for always throwing that useless religion around. The gay player is not talking about dick and praising reach arounds NO HOMO ...so this is not at all comparable, plus Christians are excepted anyway. As far as I am concerned Christians are worst than gays NO HOMO.

That's pretty much the essential reason for being bashed as a Christian.
 
VIBE;5762784 said:
.IRS.;5762689 said:
I understand "freewill" to be "the human will" - "the human will is the faculty of the human mind by which we decide or conceive of ourselves as deciding upon and initiating action"

I guess you could think of "free will" like that.

It seems to be the only functioning possibility.

 
01474183.jpg
 
Last edited:
John_Blazini;5762731 said:
Stiff;5762639 said:
John_Blazini;5762506 said:
dolphin-rape-caves-500x387.jpg


Scumbags of the sea...if dolphins were Spanish they would be Mexican

LMAO this can't be real

dolphin_hand_invalid_jepeg.jpg


=youtube_gdata_player


GOTDAYUM dolphin was all up in that pussy...and then dude tried to protect her and dolphin was like "you can get this work too nigga!"
 
using religion as your logical backup is pretty niggerish of you. :(

Actual facts >>>>>>> the bible because your argument is already biased :(
 
lechic;5762926 said:
using religion as your logical backup is pretty niggerish of you. :(

Actual facts >>>>>>> the bible because your argument is already biased :(

Whooooo shit......

It's only natural, actual facts are thrown at you.........

The impact'll blow trees back and crack statues............

 
GeminiRose;5762612 said:
lechic;5762545 said:
GeminiRose;5762039 said:
lechic;5761859 said:
RodrigueZz;5761761 said:
Also it is perfectly normal to be gay. Most animal species exhibit homosexual tendencies. And Kinsey proved that people are rarely ever 100% straight or 100% gay, they fall somewhere in between the two. Sword

i was just going to speak on kinsey's degrees of sexuality. thanks for touching on it.

Sexuality is not black and white, it is a complex grey area that only a person can define for themselves.

Hypothetically speaking, on surface level, I am straight but I can be into women's bodies only. I could be extremely attracted to the shape of a woman but completely identify with being a heterosexual woman.

Or, I could be a heterosexual woman, who is interested in men who are transsexual females. On the surface, I may seem like I am a lesbian. But because the transsexual I am dating is biologically a male with their penis & testicles attached and who identifies himself to be a male but psychically sees himself as a woman. That would make me a heterosexual woman because the man believes he is a male biologically and attracted to women. ( Note: Not all transsexuals are homosexuals).

Now, if I am dating a man who believes deep down inside he is a woman. He may look like a man, and act like a man but identifies as a woman ( which is considered transgender). I could be considered lesbian based on how my partner identifies himself as a person by gender.

See there are degrees of sexuality, and for simple-minded people who rely heavily on a religious book that does not deal with modern time complexities, is silly for an adult to use as a logical response in a "rebuttal".

On topic: I have no issue with people coming out of the closet. They should be able to be out and proud in this country.

That sounds like a bunch of mess!

-______- Obviously you havent taking a sexual psychology course. Because if you did, then you would understand everything I had spoken about.

No I haven't and I don't want to listen to some sexual scale or theory someone made up.

science is not made up. Kinsey did this study on thousand of people based on his sample population that he had. Then,Masters and Johnson modernized Kinsey degrees of sexuality to what we go by today. :(

facts >>>>> ignorance
 
lechic;5762964 said:
GeminiRose;5762612 said:
lechic;5762545 said:
GeminiRose;5762039 said:
lechic;5761859 said:
RodrigueZz;5761761 said:
Also it is perfectly normal to be gay. Most animal species exhibit homosexual tendencies. And Kinsey proved that people are rarely ever 100% straight or 100% gay, they fall somewhere in between the two. Sword

i was just going to speak on kinsey's degrees of sexuality. thanks for touching on it.

Sexuality is not black and white, it is a complex grey area that only a person can define for themselves.

Hypothetically speaking, on surface level, I am straight but I can be into women's bodies only. I could be extremely attracted to the shape of a woman but completely identify with being a heterosexual woman.

Or, I could be a heterosexual woman, who is interested in men who are transsexual females. On the surface, I may seem like I am a lesbian. But because the transsexual I am dating is biologically a male with their penis & testicles attached and who identifies himself to be a male but psychically sees himself as a woman. That would make me a heterosexual woman because the man believes he is a male biologically and attracted to women. ( Note: Not all transsexuals are homosexuals).

Now, if I am dating a man who believes deep down inside he is a woman. He may look like a man, and act like a man but identifies as a woman ( which is considered transgender). I could be considered lesbian based on how my partner identifies himself as a person by gender.

See there are degrees of sexuality, and for simple-minded people who rely heavily on a religious book that does not deal with modern time complexities, is silly for an adult to use as a logical response in a "rebuttal".

On topic: I have no issue with people coming out of the closet. They should be able to be out and proud in this country.

That sounds like a bunch of mess!

-______- Obviously you havent taking a sexual psychology course. Because if you did, then you would understand everything I had spoken about.

No I haven't and I don't want to listen to some sexual scale or theory someone made up.

science is not made up. Kinsey did this study on thousand of people based on his sample population that he had. Then,Masters and Johnson modernized Kinsey degrees of sexuality to what we go by today. :(

facts >>>>> ignorance

Those are your facts not mine! A thousand of people isn't everyone. A lot of those people were probably gay anyway.

 
Everybody praising these gays gonna learn. Especially the women who keep taking up for them. Why would you want to stand up for a dude that's trying to be like you?
 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
556
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…