John_Blazini
New member
I knew this was a Dro thread even without the caps lock ..
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gold_Certificate;5762387 said:What about them?Sour;5762318 said:Gold_Certificate;5762302 said:Come to think of it. Where does it say that "Satan" used to be an angel?Sour;5762293 said:Where did sin come from that corrupted Lucifers heart?
Maybe this is all a big misunderstanding.
Mistaken identity.
Cherubim
John_Blazini;5762396 said:I knew this was a Dro thread even without the caps lock ..
GeminiRose;5762039 said:lechic;5761859 said:RodrigueZz;5761761 said:Also it is perfectly normal to be gay. Most animal species exhibit homosexual tendencies. And Kinsey proved that people are rarely ever 100% straight or 100% gay, they fall somewhere in between the two. Sword
i was just going to speak on kinsey's degrees of sexuality. thanks for touching on it.
Sexuality is not black and white, it is a complex grey area that only a person can define for themselves.
Hypothetically speaking, on surface level, I am straight but I can be into women's bodies only. I could be extremely attracted to the shape of a woman but completely identify with being a heterosexual woman.
Or, I could be a heterosexual woman, who is interested in men who are transsexual females. On the surface, I may seem like I am a lesbian. But because the transsexual I am dating is biologically a male with their penis & testicles attached and who identifies himself to be a male but psychically sees himself as a woman. That would make me a heterosexual woman because the man believes he is a male biologically and attracted to women. ( Note: Not all transsexuals are homosexuals).
Now, if I am dating a man who believes deep down inside he is a woman. He may look like a man, and act like a man but identifies as a woman ( which is considered transgender). I could be considered lesbian based on how my partner identifies himself as a person by gender.
See there are degrees of sexuality, and for simple-minded people who rely heavily on a religious book that does not deal with modern time complexities, is silly for an adult to use as a logical response in a "rebuttal".
On topic: I have no issue with people coming out of the closet. They should be able to be out and proud in this country.
That sounds like a bunch of mess!
englishdude;5762519 said:@mods move this shit to R&R, fuck these bible bashing cunts.
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;5762341 said:VIBE;5762294 said:DoUwant2go2Heaven?;5762273 said:VIBE;5762254 said:Sour;5762248 said:Makaveli Joker;5762210 said:God created the creator of confusion...so..
Who said God created Satan?
The bible.
God created Lucifer, not satan. Lucifer turned into Satan, which means the adversary, when he rebelled in heaven.
Cosign that he created "Lucifer", but he had foreknowledge before ANYTHING had been created that his creation "Lucifer" would go on to become "Satan". Therefore, God did created Satan, as "it's his plan".
God isn't free of anything, he is considered responsible.
God can't create 'everything' and only get credit for the good and not for the bad. LOL that's one hell of a way to pick and choose.
Before the foundations of the world God knew that on April 30, 2013 you would be on the IC willfully denying His goodness, but yet He still gave you life. Go figure, huh?
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;5762358 said:VIBE;5762304 said:Sour;5762293 said:Where did sin come from that corrupted Lucifers heart?
God allowed sin to exist, therefore he created it, because it had a purpose in "Gods plans".
God cannot get a "get out of jail free" card.
No. God didn't create sin. Sin is the result of the creatures that He created rebelling against His will.
lechic;5762545 said:GeminiRose;5762039 said:lechic;5761859 said:RodrigueZz;5761761 said:Also it is perfectly normal to be gay. Most animal species exhibit homosexual tendencies. And Kinsey proved that people are rarely ever 100% straight or 100% gay, they fall somewhere in between the two. Sword
i was just going to speak on kinsey's degrees of sexuality. thanks for touching on it.
Sexuality is not black and white, it is a complex grey area that only a person can define for themselves.
Hypothetically speaking, on surface level, I am straight but I can be into women's bodies only. I could be extremely attracted to the shape of a woman but completely identify with being a heterosexual woman.
Or, I could be a heterosexual woman, who is interested in men who are transsexual females. On the surface, I may seem like I am a lesbian. But because the transsexual I am dating is biologically a male with their penis & testicles attached and who identifies himself to be a male but psychically sees himself as a woman. That would make me a heterosexual woman because the man believes he is a male biologically and attracted to women. ( Note: Not all transsexuals are homosexuals).
Now, if I am dating a man who believes deep down inside he is a woman. He may look like a man, and act like a man but identifies as a woman ( which is considered transgender). I could be considered lesbian based on how my partner identifies himself as a person by gender.
See there are degrees of sexuality, and for simple-minded people who rely heavily on a religious book that does not deal with modern time complexities, is silly for an adult to use as a logical response in a "rebuttal".
On topic: I have no issue with people coming out of the closet. They should be able to be out and proud in this country.
That sounds like a bunch of mess!
-______- Obviously you havent taking a sexual psychology course. Because if you did, then you would understand everything I had spoken about.