Conspiracy Theories That You Actually Believe

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Black_Samson;5811365 said:
ILL_Anvers;5811219 said:
Black_Samson;5811078 said:
9/11 was an obvious false flag...

how the UK gon know some shit happened before it even happens?


At approximately 2:00 pm, firefighters noticed a bulge in the southwest corner of 7 World Trade Center between the 10th and 13th floors, a sign that the building was unstable and might collapse. During the afternoon, firefighters also heard creaking sounds coming from the building.
http://www.firehouse.com/article/10568001/captain-chris-boyle

Actual firefighters who know more about fires and building collapses than your average dumbass internet conspiracist, reported that it might collapse.

Think about it, if this was some major conspiracy, then why would the bbc know about a controlled demolition and then just give it away?

The point of a conspiracy is to mislead people, not to lead them to the truth.


you said a whole lot of nothing...


confused.gif


Are you serious?

I've just clearly debunked your claim in a short and simple manner and now you're trying to say i said a whole lot of nothing? You can lead a horse to the water...

Anyway, obviously it doesn't matter what i say, you're mind is already made up so i'll leave you in your ignorance.
 
ILL_Anvers;5811219 said:
Black_Samson;5811078 said:
9/11 was an obvious false flag...

how the UK gon know some shit happened before it even happens?


At approximately 2:00 pm, firefighters noticed a bulge in the southwest corner of 7 World Trade Center between the 10th and 13th floors, a sign that the building was unstable and might collapse. During the afternoon, firefighters also heard creaking sounds coming from the building.
http://www.firehouse.com/article/10568001/captain-chris-boyle

Actual firefighters who know more about fires and building collapses than your average dumbass internet conspiracist[B/], reported that it might collapse.

Think about it, if this was some major conspiracy, then why would the bbc know about a controlled demolition and then just give it away?

The point of a conspiracy is to mislead people, not to lead them to the truth.



GTFOH

Typical dumb nigga ignoring the scientific evidence and labeling somebody a "internet conspiracist" (is that even a damn word) at the same time not knowing all the information at hand. First off, even if there was sounds heard, NO BUILDING collapses that fast without a controlled demolition. Have you seen a controlled demolition? It looked EXACTLY like building 7 and each tower. Secondly, this was supported by actual physics experts who a lot smarter than yo ignorant azz. Not some internet rumor.
 
Small correction but Kennedy won Cook County, Rock Island County, and 4 counties down in the southern part of the state across the Mississippi from ST Louis. Basically the places people actually lived Kennedy won while Nixon carried the rest.

In 2012 Obama carried the state by 16% points and lost 80 of the 102 counties.
 
Typical dumb nigga ignoring the scientific evidence and labeling somebody a "internet conspiracist" (is that even a damn word) at the same time not knowing all the information at hand. First off, even if there was sounds heard, NO BUILDING collapses that fast without a controlled demolition. Have you seen a controlled demolition? It looked EXACTLY like building 7 and each tower. Secondly, this was supported by actual physics experts who a lot smarter than yo ignorant azz. Not some internet rumor.

con·spir·a·cist [kuhn-spir-uh-sist]

noun

a person who believes in or supports a conspiracy theory.

By "internet conspiracist", i meant, someone who watches a couple of 9/11 truth youtube vids and arrogantly thinks he knows much more than the general public. You get the idea.

Actually, i used to believe the conspiracy theory to some extent.

I looked at both sides of the story with an open mind but in the end, the conspiracy theory didn't seem credible anymore.

There's also a lot of actual scientists who don't agree with you and are also a lot smarter than yo ignorant azz. We can play this childish game all day long but i won't, 'cause i don't wanna waste too much time on this shit.

Here's one of many peer reviewed papers on the collapse subject:
http://www.structuremag.org/Archives/2007-11/SF-WTC7-Gilsanz-Nov07.pdf

Do i have all the answers? No.

Am i 100% certain the official story is true and the conspiracy isn't? No.

But from what i've seen, the major conspiracy seems highly unlikely and the so called evidence didn't persuade me to believe it.

Believe whatever you want to believe bruh, it's your life.

 
Black_Samson;5813923 said:
ILL_Anvers;5813920 said:
Black_Samson;5813090 said:
ILL_Anvers;5812316 said:
I'm willing to learn new stuff and all. I looked it up.

But still, what is your point...?

seriously dude?

the whole... using sound to make heat, didnt seem SHOCKING to you?

I think you're confusing LRAD with ADS.

it's possible.... ive had to memorize alot of friggin acronym's...

I forgive you.

Btw, ADS works like a microwave, it doesn't use sound.

I agree, technology is amazing but WHAT THE FUCK is your point?!

How, when and where did they use this as part of a conspiracy?

 
Maximus Rex;5810016 said:
So you believe the Warren Commission? Or that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone?
Warren Commission? eh. Oswald acted alone? yeah.

blackamerica;5810314 said:
9/11? Too much evidence pointing back to the Bush administration. You gotta kiddin me
do you have any serious evidence beyond "i don't like the Bush administration?"

blackamerica;5810759 said:
Thats important considering if you look at the hole at the Pentagon, its very small and impossible for a huge plane to fit through.
the question i HAVE to ask in this scenario is "are you aware of the actual size of the Pentagon?" also, what's your position on eyewitness testimony, again?

blackamerica;5810759 said:
Lastly, how coincidental is it that the alleged mastermind of this be business partners with the commander in chief?
this tells me you're confusing various Bin Ladens

blackamerica;5812587 said:
First off, even if there was sounds heard, NO BUILDING collapses that fast without a controlled demolition. Have you seen a controlled demolition?
wait, how many times have you seen other airliners strike the WTC to know that they wouldn't collapse that fast?

 
janklow;5814105 said:
do you have any serious evidence beyond "i don't like the Bush administration?"

Nobody liked the Bush administration, given the amount of lies we found they sold the public. I'd tell you to do your research, but you obviously already made up your mind "its not true" before looking at all the information. Fool

janklow;5814105 said:
the question i HAVE to ask in this scenario is "are you aware of the actual size of the Pentagon?" also, what's your position on eyewitness testimony, again?

Eye witnesses stories were all over the place. Some saw a plane, other saw a missle.

I'm more concerned with the ACTUAL wreckage. The official explanation was that the plane completely disintegrated into the Pentagon leaving only the engine & tiny skid marks. Really??? What happened to the airplane??? Its impossible for a 747 (w/ passenger's) to completely vanish in a plane crash. Where were the bodies??? Can you educate me?

(Knowing you, you'll probably avoid these questions & change the subject, we'll see)

janklow;5814105 said:
this tells me you're confusing various Bin Ladens

So there's more than one Bin Laden family now??? Gtfoh my nigga. You sound real stupid defending the undefendable. The Bush & Bin Laden families have a long business relationship together. Thats NOT a conspiracy but a fact. Stop it

janklow;5814105 said:
wait, how many times have you seen other airliners strike the WTC to know that they wouldn't collapse that fast?

Thats irrelevant. Even if the plane did melt the steel in the towers, 1)They wouldnt have collapsed that quickly. Plus the towers were built to withstand temperatures hotter than a airplane 2)What's common in a controlled demolition is an explosion before the collapse. Firefighters in the buildings verified hearing these sounds from the basement. 3)Having seen a controlled demolition before, thats the ONLY way buildings collapse at that speed.

I'm tired of debating you bro. You don't answer any questions or respond directly to anything. All you've done is tap dance around things you CLEARLY have no knowledge of. After you defended George Zimmerman I lost hope. Good luck in life
 
9/11 looks like a controlled demo all day but I can't get past how they could do it, so I say no to that.

I think that the gov is lying about it tho.

& the fact that the made up group Al-qaeda hasn't done anything america since 9/11 after they made them seem like super villains ain't helping.

 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
175
Views
67
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…