Conspiracy Theories That You Actually Believe

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date

jono

New member
I believe someof the 9/11 conspiracy theories. Specifically I believe:

1. The Bush Admin. had foreknowledge/warnings that a strike against the towers were imminent or had been threatened in the past.

2. The Bush Admin. allowed it to happen because he wanted to invade Iraq, not just for the oil and to finish the job his daddy started but also to fulfill PNAC's (Project for New American Century) goals of removing Saddam from power, a good position for the Iranian invasion.
 
Don't believe it but it was an entertaining documentary, "2016: Obama's America", was a good bit of propaganda.
 
There's corruption on every level of government. The judicial system is corrupt. The prison system is corrupt. The IRS is in hot water over targeting tea party members for taxes, corrupt too. The Banks are corrupt

If you think its a conspiracy that the richest elite groups in the world control & manipulate world events for they're own agendas, your a idiot
 
Oh and 9/11 was sought out & orchestrated by the Bush administration, fact. The US government has assigned a government kill list where they are currently assassinating people under an executive order signed by Obama, fact.
 
I believe that the villifying of capitalism and the promotion of socialism is a prelude to softening up the populace to give up more of their constitutional rights

I believe there is a gay agenda being pushed to further break up the generational wealth created by strong nuclear families

I believe that govt and the rich population give out handouts to placate poor people and keep them in place instead of really trying to help them

I believe that black people are purposely being targeted for elimination in America
 
tumblr_meknylOpzF1qg996lo1_500.gif
 
Last edited:
blackamerica;5810314 said:
janklow;5809976 said:
Kennedy assassination theories? nah

9/11 conspiracy theories? nah

sorry, guys

9/11? Too much evidence pointing back to the Bush administration. You gotta kiddin me

The problem with people who believe 9/11 conspiracies is that their showing their ignorance of the intelligence community. Unlike my JFK assassination theory, (which could've been done with the knowledge of a few people,) The 9/11 conspiracy theory falls a part simply because of the amount of people who had access to that information, which was probably hundreds possibly even thousands of people. Also the House and Senate Intelligence Committees get the same intel the President does. My point is that there were simply too my people involved to keep Pres. Bush having foreknowledge of 9/11 a secret. Also people are forgetting that people in the intelligence community are extremely patriotic, if had foreknowledge that attack was imminent and he left it go down anyway, somebody would have gotten that information to the press, a la Deep Throat. Also, I have a had time believing that Colin Powell would have went along with some shit like that.
 
Maximus Rex;5810371 said:
blackamerica;5810314 said:
janklow;5809976 said:
Kennedy assassination theories? nah

9/11 conspiracy theories? nah

sorry, guys

9/11? Too much evidence pointing back to the Bush administration. You gotta kiddin me

The problem with people who believe 9/11 conspiracies is that their showing their ignorance of the intelligence community. Unlike my JFK assassination theory, (which could've been done with the knowledge of a few people,) The 9/11 conspiracy theory falls a part simply because of the amount of people who had access to that information, which was probably hundreds possibly even thousands of people. Also the House and Senate Intelligence Committees get the same intel the President does. My point is that there were simply too my people involved to keep Pres. Bush having foreknowledge of 9/11 a secret. Also people are forgetting that people in the intelligence community are extremely patriotic, if had foreknowledge that attack was imminent and he left it go down anyway, somebody would have gotten that information to the press, a la Deep Throat. Also, I h ave a had time believing that Colin Powell would have went along with some shit like that.

Two words: Controlled demolition

No way a 747 slams in a building and it collaspes like that. I watched both towers fall over a billion times and its impossible. Then you have witnesses reporting loud explosions coming from the basement. You also have thermite found at ground zero. The plane that allegedly slammed in the Pentagon footage STILL hasn't been released from the gas station across the street. Thats important considering if you look at the hole at the Pentagon, its very small and impossible for a huge plane to fit through.

Lastly, how coincidental is it that the alleged mastermind of this be business partners with the commander in chief? Cool enough to fly his family out the US the same day as 9/11. Shit was a setup bro. Niggaz just choose not to believe certain things even when evidence says otherwise
 
Dude, if something gets hot enough, it will melt or compromise the structurally integrity of the steel enough that it will weaken.
 
Last edited:
I don't debate Conspiracy Theories, it is like trying to talk a Southern Baptist out of Christianity. Had more fruitful conversations with the wall I slam my head into.
 
Two words: Controlled demolition

No way a 747 slams in a building and it collaspes like that. I watched both towers fall over a billion times and its impossible. Then you have witnesses reporting loud explosions coming from the basement. You also have thermite found at ground zero. The plane that allegedly slammed in the Pentagon footage STILL hasn't been released from the gas station across the street. Thats important considering if you look at the hole at the Pentagon, its very small and impossible for a huge plane to fit through.

Lastly, how coincidental is it that the alleged mastermind of this be business partners with the commander in chief? Cool enough to fly his family out the US the same day as 9/11. Shit was a setup bro. Niggaz just choose not to believe certain things even when evidence says otherwise

"Melted" Steel

Claim: "We have been lied to," announces the Web site AttackOnAmerica.net. "The first lie was that the load of fuel from the aircraft was the cause of structural failure. No kerosene fire can burn hot enough to melt steel." The posting is entitled "Proof Of Controlled Demolition At The WTC."

FACT: Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500°F, not hot enough to melt steel (2750°F). However, experts agree that for the towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength—and that required exposure to much less heat. "I have never seen melted steel in a building fire," says retired New York deputy fire chief Vincent Dunn, author of The Collapse Of Burning Buildings: A Guide To Fireground Safety. "But I've seen a lot of twisted, warped, bent and sagging steel. What happens is that the steel tries to expand at both ends, but when it can no longer expand, it sags and the surrounding concrete cracks."

"Steel loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100°F," notes senior engineer Farid Alfawak-hiri of the American Institute of Steel Construction. "And at 1800° it is probably at less than 10 percent." NIST also believes that a great deal of the spray-on fireproofing insulation was likely knocked off the steel beams that were in the path of the crashing jets, leaving the metal more vulnerable to the heat.

But jet fuel wasn't the only thing burning, notes Forman Williams, a professor of engineering at the University of California, San Diego, and one of seven structural engineers and fire experts that PM consulted. He says that while the jet fuel was the catalyst for the WTC fires, the resulting inferno was intensified by the combustible material inside the buildings, including rugs, curtains, furniture and paper. NIST reports that pockets of fire hit 1832°F.

"The jet fuel was the ignition source," Williams tells PM. "It burned for maybe 10 minutes, and [the towers] were still standing in 10 minutes. It was the rest of the stuff burning afterward that was responsible for the heat transfer that eventually brought them down."

PopularMechanics.com
 
ILL_Anvers;5811002 said:
Two words: Controlled demolition

No way a 747 slams in a building and it collaspes like that. I watched both towers fall over a billion times and its impossible. Then you have witnesses reporting loud explosions coming from the basement. You also have thermite found at ground zero. The plane that allegedly slammed in the Pentagon footage STILL hasn't been released from the gas station across the street. Thats important considering if you look at the hole at the Pentagon, its very small and impossible for a huge plane to fit through.

Lastly, how coincidental is it that the alleged mastermind of this be business partners with the commander in chief? Cool enough to fly his family out the US the same day as 9/11. Shit was a setup bro. Niggaz just choose not to believe certain things even when evidence says otherwise

"Melted" Steel

Claim: "We have been lied to," announces the Web site AttackOnAmerica.net. "The first lie was that the load of fuel from the aircraft was the cause of structural failure. No kerosene fire can burn hot enough to melt steel." The posting is entitled "Proof Of Controlled Demolition At The WTC."

FACT: Jet fuel burns at 800° to 1500°F, not hot enough to melt steel (2750°F). However, experts agree that for the towers to collapse, their steel frames didn't need to melt, they just had to lose some of their structural strength—and that required exposure to much less heat. "I have never seen melted steel in a building fire," says retired New York deputy fire chief Vincent Dunn, author of The Collapse Of Burning Buildings: A Guide To Fireground Safety. "But I've seen a lot of twisted, warped, bent and sagging steel. What happens is that the steel tries to expand at both ends, but when it can no longer expand, it sags and the surrounding concrete cracks."

"Steel loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100°F," notes senior engineer Farid Alfawak-hiri of the American Institute of Steel Construction. "And at 1800° it is probably at less than 10 percent." NIST also believes that a great deal of the spray-on fireproofing insulation was likely knocked off the steel beams that were in the path of the crashing jets, leaving the metal more vulnerable to the heat.

But jet fuel wasn't the only thing burning, notes Forman Williams, a professor of engineering at the University of California, San Diego, and one of seven structural engineers and fire experts that PM consulted. He says that while the jet fuel was the catalyst for the WTC fires, the resulting inferno was intensified by the combustible material inside the buildings, including rugs, curtains, furniture and paper. NIST reports that pockets of fire hit 1832°F.

"The jet fuel was the ignition source," Williams tells PM. "It burned for maybe 10 minutes, and [the towers] were still standing in 10 minutes. It was the rest of the stuff burning afterward that was responsible for the heat transfer that eventually brought them down."

PopularMechanics.com

I was going to mention that article, but I don't have time to look it up. As a matter of fact, I think an entire issue of Popular Mechanics was devoted to what you just posted.

Also what niggas is forgetting is that the F.B.I. and the C.I.A. are semi-autonomous agencies and only in extreme circumstances do they presidential permission to act. Case in point with the 9/11 hijackers, if the Feds were on their jobs, the most info the President Bush would have got was, we're following these cats. This is purely conjecture on my part, but I'm assuming that the next time Pres. Bush would have heard about those dudes was when they were about to be or already in custody.
 
Black_Samson;5811078 said:
9/11 was an obvious false flag...

how the UK gon know some shit happened before it even happens?


At approximately 2:00 pm, firefighters noticed a bulge in the southwest corner of 7 World Trade Center between the 10th and 13th floors, a sign that the building was unstable and might collapse. During the afternoon, firefighters also heard creaking sounds coming from the building.
http://www.firehouse.com/article/10568001/captain-chris-boyle

Actual firefighters who know more about fires and building collapses than your average dumbass internet conspiracist, reported that it might collapse.

Think about it, if this was some major conspiracy, then why would the bbc know about a controlled demolition and then just give it away?

The point of a conspiracy is to mislead people, not to lead them to the truth.

 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
175
Views
69
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…