Coming soon: our next stage, Homo evolutus.

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
I cant speak for every athiest because unlike people of a religious denomination, athiests do not subscribe to the same thoughts.

I will say for myself that the same energy i put used to put onto the worship of dieties i now put into seeking knowledge and truly understanding how things work.

I really feel like everything boils down to positive and negative energy, but i think it is foolish to assign a diety to personify those energies.
 
ShiveDreadz;5577385 said:
I cant speak for every athiest because unlike people of a religious denomination, athiests do not subscribe to the same thoughts.

I will say for myself that the same energy i put used to put onto the worship of dieties i now put into seeking knowledge and truly understanding how things work.

I really feel like everything boils down to positive and negative energy, but i think it is foolish to assign a diety to personify those energies.

f079eorigcoolstorybro9.jpg


Ahhhhhh where was I ??????????

OH YES..........

Assertion: Because modern humans are a young species, there has not been enough time for major differences to emerge between populations.

The literature on recent human evolution is still evolving, so to speak. But it is clear that during the Holocene, the last 10,000 years, our species has been subject to a wide array of selective forces. Lactose tolerance, malaria tolerance, differences in color, hair form, and size, seem to be due to recent adaptations.
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/crux/?p=1350#.UT9G2Bwz0th

 
MansaMusa67;5578065 said:
So basically they are saying that the so called "negro" is a primitive form of white man?

I just hope my comprehension is off.....

Thats exactly what I'm getting from the picture. Seems like bullshit, but to play the devils advocate, europeans (as well as other ethnic backgrounds) DID originate from Africa. Afterwards, they developed into different types of humans due to the geographic area they ended up inhabiting. I dont agree with what the picture is conveying though.

 
MansaMusa67;5578065 said:
So basically they are saying that the so called "negro" is a primitive form of white man?

I just hope my comprehension is off.....

Your comprehension is on, brother..........

I am simply illustrating that this research is not just coming from outright "racist" outdated research.............

Current research topics support your summery of the evidence.............

I post this shit because.........

I am going to kill the fuckery out there.......................

People are in demand for the truth...........

بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم

bismi-llāhi r-raḥmāni r-raḥīm

In the name of God, the Most Gracious, the Most Merciful.

 
I'm going to evolve alright when the flood comes on the house of Jacob and the Most High activate that Supreme Being Black Man DNA to defend ourselves and there is going to be a bunch of Hancocks flying a around whoppin asses when there will be no form of weapon to hurt us, A Battle Axe that will crush nations, yall going to see some next level human evolution shit of ass whoppins..

 
GREAT THREAD BROTHER BAMBU and @MansaMusa67 welcome brother looking forward to your posts and future threads.....we about to get this form popping again even with overseer @janklow i got my eyes on ya negro's ya here lurking in the cotton field....

what up @janklow I snatch that whip from you and choke the shit out of you,lol......
 
waterproof;5589079 said:
GREAT THREAD BROTHER BAMBU and @MansaMusa67 welcome brother looking forward to your posts and future threads.....we about to get this form popping again even with overseer @janklow i got my eyes on ya negro's ya here lurking in the cotton field....

what up @janklow I snatch that whip from you and choke the shit out of you,lol......
what the fuck is going on in this thread

 
We are still evolving ppl born now are missing a bone in their foot we don't need anymore and other things are very slowly evolving

IDK what ppl will be like in the future but they will look different and will be smarter
 
Last edited:
loch121;5593185 said:
We are still evolving ppl born now are missing a bone in their foot we don't need anymore and other things are very slowly evolving

IDK what ppl will be like in the future but they will look different and will be smarter

LOL.....

The old vestigial argument..................

From the appendix......

To the pineal gland.......

To wisdom teeth........

To human tailbones..........

Now missing feet bones?????????

There is no junk or useless vestigial structures in the human body..........

 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vestigiality

A vestigial organ may not be useless it has simply lost its primary purpose. Some moles still have eyes covered by skin these organs are useless while an appendix might offer an advantage to our immune system. The evidence that vestigial organs present is of organisms in a state of change.
 
whar;5612766 said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vestigiality

A vestigial organ may not be useless it has simply lost its primary purpose. Some moles still have eyes covered by skin these organs are useless while an appendix might offer an advantage to our immune system. The evidence that vestigial organs present is of organisms in a state of change.

Long time..........

My apologies for getting hot-headed a while back.........

Your comments are welcome & although I have already illustrated several flaws with human vestigiality......

I will do it again............

Who determines the "primary function" of the organs in question??????????

 
Primary function is determine by examining the structure in other related species. In almost all Euarchontoglires (a large grouping of mammals that includes primates) the appendix is used as part of digestions. In humans this feature has atrophied and it is not used in digestion anymore.
 
From Wikipedia..........

Immune function

Loren G. Martin, a professor of physiology at Oklahoma State University, argues that the appendix has a function in fetuses and adults.[7] Endocrine cells have been found in the appendix of 11-week-old fetuses that contribute to "biological control (homeostatic) mechanisms." In adults, Martin argues that the appendix acts as a lymphatic organ. The appendix is experimentally verified as being rich in infection-fighting lymphoid cells, suggesting that it might play a role in the immune system. Zahid[8] suggests that it plays a role in both manufacturing hormones in fetal development as well as functioning to "train" the immune system, exposing the body to antigens so that it can produce antibodies. He notes that doctors in the last decade have stopped removing the appendix during other surgical procedures as a routine precaution, because it can be successfully transplanted into the urinary tract to rebuild a sphincter muscle and reconstruct a functional bladder.[9]

330px-Appendix_function_diagram.svg.png


Maintaining gut flora

Possible function of the human vermiform appendix as a "safe house" for beneficial bacteria in the recovery from diarrhea.

Although it was long accepted that the immune tissue, called gut associated lymphoid tissue, surrounding the appendix and elsewhere in the gut carries out a number of important functions, explanations were lacking for the distinctive shape of the appendix and its apparent lack of importance as judged by an absence of side effects following appendectomy.[10]

William Parker, Randy Bollinger, and colleagues at Duke University proposed that the appendix serves as a haven for useful bacteria when illness flushes those bacteria from the rest of the intestines.[9][11] This proposal is based on a new understanding of how the immune system supports the growth of beneficial intestinal bacteria,[12][13] in combination with many well-known features of the appendix, including its architecture, its location just below the normal one-way flow of food and germs in the large intestine, and its association with copious amounts of immune tissue. Research performed at Winthrop University-Hospital showed that individuals without an appendix were four times more likely to have a recurrence of Clostridium difficile.[14] However, other research showed that there is a greater rate of C. difficile infection among people with an appendix than those without.[15]

 
What do you conclude from the information you posted?

Do you dispute that vestigial organs exist? That the appendix is one?

I would conclude that while vestigial the appendix still offers a small benefit. This benefit must be minor since removing it does not produce harmful side effects.
 


I conclude that that the appendix has a purpose in the human body.............

The presumption that the organ is useless or vestigial came before medicine was able to confirm this............

I dispute that vestigiality exists........

Just because humans can survive without an appendix does not prove that it serves no or its "original" purpose.....

No evidence of human vestige can be confirmed..........

No appendix....

No wisdom teeth....

No tailbone......

No pineal gland............

No feet bones..........

No nothing.........

Everything in the human body was created to serve a purpose................

 

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
228
Views
335
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…