Shizlansky
New member
They got to trade Manning. Cuz Luck gon need more pieces to be successful.
Last edited:
bow to royalty
New member
I dunno why people are laughin at Peyton to be real. Let's say they bring in Luck and drop Manning. Ok, who's better off? Colts comin off a 2-14 season, gettin a rookie QB, and lookin at losin key players (Wayne, Mathis). Or a free agent Peyton who can go to the Jets, 49ers, Dolphins, or whatever team is a QB away.
Last edited:
BlackAX410
New member
hlf;4032204 said:
i got the doo doo browns or even the vikings takin him ahead of yall
Last edited:
GoodSiqMoney
New member
Throwed Off Axel;4034309 said:
makes no sense for the vikes to take him
taking 2 qb's back to back would be like when the lions could never hit on a wr and jus kept drafting one
Last edited:
greenwood1921
New member
Smart move by the Colts. They WILL listen to trade offers. Trust. And don't think Manning is automatically out the door if Luck comes in.
This is a copy cat league, so they'd love for Luck to chill behind Manning for a couple years like Favre and Rodgers. That helped Rodgers - not because favre 'coached' him, but it gave him the opportunity to ease into the role and watch one of the best, instead of being thrown to the lions.
This is a copy cat league, so they'd love for Luck to chill behind Manning for a couple years like Favre and Rodgers. That helped Rodgers - not because favre 'coached' him, but it gave him the opportunity to ease into the role and watch one of the best, instead of being thrown to the lions.
Last edited:
BlackAX410
New member
hlf;4034329 said:
nah not at all i hate the Browns cuz i kno they are snakebitten plus i wanna go see him play in DC
Last edited:
