Changing America - What Does the Rise in Interracial Relationships Really Mean?

[Stiff]

Read what you just typed and see if that makes sense

I did, makes perfect sense to me. What's off

 

[zombie]

Race mixing will not bring blacks into power all it does is create another racial group that will either be loyal to it's own interests or to whatever race is dominant. They will have no special love for black people.

Mixed people are not and will never be their own racial group in this country. How could you say this when the 1 drop rule is still very much alive and well?

The one drop rule is alive for now it will die and America will become very similar to the south American nations.

That's the same unfounded fear that far right extremists have. Why would racial relations come to that when the histories and racial makeups are so different between latin American nations and the U.S/Canada?

Dog the definitions of race is already changing. More people who would have identified as black a generation ago now identify as mixed race. And as more Hispanics flood the nation they are just going to bring that culture of fuck dark skin people with them.

The writing is on the wall.

The census only just started adding mixed race as an option (in the 2000 census). On top of that, just because somebody checks a box on a questionnaire doesn't mean they renounce all or part of their heritage or don't identify with their Blackness.

And you're talking only 4% of the entire Black population even identifying as mixed race

Keep putting your head in the sand. In the next census watch that number double. Race mixing is destructive to the power of the black race it saps away out resources and long term adds to your continual servitude. North America is becoming like south America and many blacks cannot see it because you are blinded by bullshit.

Wake the fuck up how many warnings are you niggas going to need.

There's no evidence that suggests that North America is becoming like South America. Culturally the two are very different. Like I said, just because more people acknowledge a mixed ancestry doesn't mean that they're disregarding their Blackness.

There are too many real issues that face Black people to worry about hypothetical/imaginary ones.

There are millions of south Americans coming here they are bringing their culture with them. Adding to a culture in America that is already anti black to create a new culture that most likely will be just as racist if not more.

Race mixing is a condensation of many of the mental issues that black people have and is the ultimate sign of our problems. It's self hate, economically damaging, it feeds light skin vs dark skin divides. And it creates one less black family

 

[zombie]

How is the amalgamation of Whites and Blacks not going to siphon some of that systemic power from the former group into the latter?

It eventually creates a new group that power does not transfer to black folk.

 

[Stiff]

How is the amalgamation of Whites and Blacks not going to siphon some of that systemic power from the former group into the latter?

It eventually creates a new group that power does not transfer to black folk.

But you have no way of knowing this..you can't use south america as an example because the racial setup there is the way it is because of differences between how Spain colonized and how Britain colonized...

What's the historical precedence that supports what you're saying?

 

[LUClEN]

How is the amalgamation of Whites and Blacks not going to siphon some of that systemic power from the former group into the latter?

It eventually creates a new group that power does not transfer to black folk.

But you have no way of knowing this..you can't use south america as an example because the racial setup there is the way it is because of differences between how Spain colonized and how Britain colonized...

What's the historical precedence that supports what you're saying?

Looking at the way people perceive Dark skinned and Light skinned people on this very forum he may have a point

 

[zombie]

How is the amalgamation of Whites and Blacks not going to siphon some of that systemic power from the former group into the latter?

It eventually creates a new group that power does not transfer to black folk.

But you have no way of knowing this..you can't use south america as an example because the racial setup there is the way it is because of differences between how Spain colonized and how Britain colonized...

What's the historical precedence that supports what you're saying?

The cultural differences are not as vast as you are trying to make it seem both cultures have many things in common. One being hate of blacks already you have more Hispanics identifying as white. Right here in America during the early days of slavery and a little later on in some states mulattos were allowed to own full black slaves. If you don't believe me look it up .

 

[Stiff]

How is the amalgamation of Whites and Blacks not going to siphon some of that systemic power from the former group into the latter?

It eventually creates a new group that power does not transfer to black folk.

But you have no way of knowing this..you can't use south america as an example because the racial setup there is the way it is because of differences between how Spain colonized and how Britain colonized...

What's the historical precedence that supports what you're saying?

The cultural differences are not as vast as you are trying to make it seem both cultures have many things in common. One being hate of blacks already you have more Hispanics identifying as white. Right here in America during the early days of slavery and a little later on in some states mulattos were allowed to own full black slaves. If you don't believe me look it up .

All throughout slavery Blacks were allowed to own full black slaves and did up until the end of the Civil War. Blacks were even allowed to own white indentured servants for a time. The bolded proves nothing.

But we've had this discussion on here before and we just fundamentally disagree on the outlook in that regard so we don't need to go further.

 

[Stiff]

How is the amalgamation of Whites and Blacks not going to siphon some of that systemic power from the former group into the latter?

It eventually creates a new group that power does not transfer to black folk.

But you have no way of knowing this..you can't use south america as an example because the racial setup there is the way it is because of differences between how Spain colonized and how Britain colonized...

What's the historical precedence that supports what you're saying?

Looking at the way people perceive Dark skinned and Light skinned people on this very forum he may have a point

The divide between dark skinned Blacks and light skinned Blacks is extremely miniscule in 2015..the internet will have you believing there's a civil war amongst Black people between complexions but it's mostly jokes.

 

[zombie]

How is the amalgamation of Whites and Blacks not going to siphon some of that systemic power from the former group into the latter?

It eventually creates a new group that power does not transfer to black folk.

But you have no way of knowing this..you can't use south america as an example because the racial setup there is the way it is because of differences between how Spain colonized and how Britain colonized...

What's the historical precedence that supports what you're saying?

The cultural differences are not as vast as you are trying to make it seem both cultures have many things in common. One being hate of blacks already you have more Hispanics identifying as white. Right here in America during the early days of slavery and a little later on in some states mulattos were allowed to own full black slaves. If you don't believe me look it up .

All throughout slavery Blacks were allowed to own full black slaves and did up until the end of the Civil War. Blacks were even allowed to own white indentured services for a time. The bolded proves nothing.

But we've had this discussion on here before and we just fundamentally disagree on the outlook in that regard so we don't need to go further.

The vast vast vast majority of blacks that owned slaves were mullatos. Which proves that they won't be loyal to full blacks , when it suits their interests they won't give a fuck about their black ancestry. Which is the historical precedent you asked me for.

We can't go further because your arguments against what I have said are hollow.

 

[zombie]

How is the amalgamation of Whites and Blacks not going to siphon some of that systemic power from the former group into the latter?

It eventually creates a new group that power does not transfer to black folk.

But you have no way of knowing this..you can't use south america as an example because the racial setup there is the way it is because of differences between how Spain colonized and how Britain colonized...

What's the historical precedence that supports what you're saying?

Looking at the way people perceive Dark skinned and Light skinned people on this very forum he may have a point

The divide between dark skinned Blacks and light skinned Blacks is extremely miniscule in 2015..the internet will have you believing there's a civil war amongst Black people between complexions but it's mostly jokes.

Hahahahaha are you joking the divide between dark and light skin black men

Is miniscule but the women that's a whole other level of battle.

 

[zombie]

According to the results of both doll tests our children still see light skin as better. There is a serious problem with colorism amongst black people let's not fools ourselves.

 

[Stiff]

How is the amalgamation of Whites and Blacks not going to siphon some of that systemic power from the former group into the latter?

It eventually creates a new group that power does not transfer to black folk.

But you have no way of knowing this..you can't use south america as an example because the racial setup there is the way it is because of differences between how Spain colonized and how Britain colonized...

What's the historical precedence that supports what you're saying?

The cultural differences are not as vast as you are trying to make it seem both cultures have many things in common. One being hate of blacks already you have more Hispanics identifying as white. Right here in America during the early days of slavery and a little later on in some states mulattos were allowed to own full black slaves. If you don't believe me look it up .

All throughout slavery Blacks were allowed to own full black slaves and did up until the end of the Civil War. Blacks were even allowed to own white indentured services for a time. The bolded proves nothing.

But we've had this discussion on here before and we just fundamentally disagree on the outlook in that regard so we don't need to go further.

The vast vast vast majority of blacks that owned slaves were mullatos. Which proves that they won't be loyal to full blacks , when it suits their interests they won't give a fuck about their black ancestry. Which is the historical precedent you asked me for.

We can't go further because your arguments against what I have said are hollow.

My argument is that you have no evidence to support your argument so it's purely speculative. That's far from hollow. The bolded is not true. The vast majority were not mullatos. If they were, give me a specific percentage and show me where you got that percentage from.

 

[zombie]

How is the amalgamation of Whites and Blacks not going to siphon some of that systemic power from the former group into the latter?

It eventually creates a new group that power does not transfer to black folk.

But you have no way of knowing this..you can't use south america as an example because the racial setup there is the way it is because of differences between how Spain colonized and how Britain colonized...

What's the historical precedence that supports what you're saying?

The cultural differences are not as vast as you are trying to make it seem both cultures have many things in common. One being hate of blacks already you have more Hispanics identifying as white. Right here in America during the early days of slavery and a little later on in some states mulattos were allowed to own full black slaves. If you don't believe me look it up .

All throughout slavery Blacks were allowed to own full black slaves and did up until the end of the Civil War. Blacks were even allowed to own white indentured services for a time. The bolded proves nothing.

But we've had this discussion on here before and we just fundamentally disagree on the outlook in that regard so we don't need to go further.

The vast vast vast majority of blacks that owned slaves were mullatos. Which proves that they won't be loyal to full blacks , when it suits their interests they won't give a fuck about their black ancestry. Which is the historical precedent you asked me for.

We can't go further because your arguments against what I have said are hollow.

My argument is that you have no evidence to support your argument so it's purely speculative. That's far from hollow. The bolded is not true. The vast majority were not mullatos. If they were, give me a specific percentage and show me where you got that percentage from.

Don't worry I'll give you some links very soon that will give credence what I said about the history of mullatos.

 

[Stiff]

According to the results of both doll tests our children still see light skin as better. There is a serious problem with colorism amongst black people let's not fools ourselves.

With your own 2 eyes and based off of your own personal experiences how have you seen these results that you speak of translate into the real world?

 

[zombie]

According to the results of both doll tests our children still see light skin as better. There is a serious problem with colorism amongst black people let's not fools ourselves.

With your own 2 eyes and based off of your own personal experiences how have you seen these results that you speak of translate into the real world?

You can't trust only your eyes. My eyes are limited to what i surround myself with. a better indicator of the truth is a scientific sociological study conducted by people who.

professionally study the mind and society

 

[Stiff]

According to the results of both doll tests our children still see light skin as better. There is a serious problem with colorism amongst black people let's not fools ourselves.

With your own 2 eyes and based off of your own personal experiences how have you seen these results that you speak of translate into the real world?

You can't trust only your eyes. My eyes are limited to what i surround myself with. a better indicator of the truth is a scientific sociological study conducted by people who.

professionally study the mind and society

So you put more faith in a "study" than your own personal experiences?

 

[LUClEN]

According to the results of both doll tests our children still see light skin as better. There is a serious problem with colorism amongst black people let's not fools ourselves.

With your own 2 eyes and based off of your own personal experiences how have you seen these results that you speak of translate into the real world?

You can't trust only your eyes. My eyes are limited to what i surround myself with. a better indicator of the truth is a scientific sociological study conducted by people who.

professionally study the mind and society

So you put more faith in a "study" than your own personal experiences?

Provided the study's methodology is not flawed doing the opposite is fallacious

 

[Stiff]

According to the results of both doll tests our children still see light skin as better. There is a serious problem with colorism amongst black people let's not fools ourselves.

With your own 2 eyes and based off of your own personal experiences how have you seen these results that you speak of translate into the real world?

You can't trust only your eyes. My eyes are limited to what i surround myself with. a better indicator of the truth is a scientific sociological study conducted by people who.

professionally study the mind and society

So you put more faith in a "study" than your own personal experiences?

Provided the study's methodology is not flawed doing the opposite is fallacious

Bolded the key word for emphasis.

 

[Negro_Caesar]

I have a mixed kid (black/mexican)and im pretty sure shes going to see herself as being black.shes only 1. I mean my baby mama wont even buy her a doll thats not black. She understands how i feel about my daughter understand shes black.

But i dont see anything wrong with having a interracial child. Its the black parents fault if they child doesnt understand black roots and traditions.

And none of u black militant ass niggas is turning down a dime piece cause shes white. If u do then ur a dumbass. I understand being pro black and everything but i understand being a man first, and fat ass on any color is attractive to me

 

[D0wn]

.

I have a mixed kid (black/mexican)and im pretty sure shes going to see herself as being black.shes only 1. I mean my baby mama wont even buy her a doll thats not black. She understands how i feel about my daughter understand shes black.

But i dont see anything wrong with having a interracial child. Its the black parents fault if they child doesnt understand black roots and traditions.

And none of u black militant ass niggas is turning down a dime piece cause shes white. If u do then ur a dumbass. I understand being pro black and everything but i understand being a man first, and fat ass on any color is attractive to me

Every nigga ain't enslaved by their dick.

2. So there's no black mexicans???

3. Your post sound, as if you n your baby moms are not even together?