7figz;c-9915556 said:
Since the attitude yall both seem to share is no harm no foul, live and learn
You're misconstruing (perhaps purposely) my "attitude." I never said there was no harm, no foul. It's quite obvious that there
is often harm and foul in these situations, which is why I raised the point of possibly seeking legal action as a more reasonable option to obtain some kind of justice, as opposed to literally resorting to murder.
Question: do you think it's justified/ to murder a tranny if she "tricked" (never mind the moderate consensus here that you'd have to be pretty stupid to be "tricked" in the first place) you into having sex?
We've already established the fact that murder can and does happen in these situations, and from a mental or cultural standpoint, it's understandable (understandable =/= justified). So that's not my question. I'm asking you whether you think such a
murder is
justified.
And I'm sure half of the niggas talking that murder shit, couldn't even bring themselves to do it, especially if they're not on the psychopath/sociopath spectrum. Murder is a lot different when you're not doing it on a video game or watching it on a movie. The least you'd do is beat the tranny up, that is, if you can even muster up the "courage," especially if the "woman" (who is still a man) has the capacity to fuck you up.
7figz;c-9915556 said:
- should that be the case with somebody who had sex with somebody and found out later they was underage ?
If I'm understanding you correctly, I believe you're asking me/us whether it's the case, as I have argued in the tranny scenario, that a man should take his L and possibly seek legal action if he was tricked into having sex by a minor.
Obviously, the situation is different and more complicated, because 1. we're dealing with minors (who are generally not legally accountable) and 2. sex with a minor and/or statutory rape is a clearer and perhaps more serious crime, regardless of how fair or unfair that may be. So unlike in the tranny scenario, minors are involved and the guy is the criminal.
However,
some of what I said still applies. Again, it's quite simple to me. As an adult heterosexual male, you should be responsible. You should be responsible in your sexual life - be responsible concerning STIs/STDS, trannies, minors, etc. Some of these problems are very easy to avoid, as long as you're
responsible.
If green pus is coming from a woman's pussy, then you probably shouldn't fuck her, regardless of how thirsty you are. If that "woman" you're scoping out from afar turns out to have bigger hands and shoulders than you, then you probably shouldn't fuck her, regardless of how thirsty you are. If a "woman" looks a little bit on the younger side and doesn't understand all the cultural references you're making that exist outside of her generation, then you probably shouldn't fuck her. Generally speaking, you should get to know the people whom you fuck with, whether it's sexual or not.
Is that always easy? No. But you should do the best you can. And if you fuck up, well, you fuck up, and you'll have to deal with the consequences. So no, whether you happen to fuck a tranny or a minor, it's never no harm, no foul. You can suffer personally and/or legally. But "live and learn" still applies. Responsibility is what separates adults from children. Life is hard, but you can either accept your share of the responsibility for your mistakes and grow wiser (like Tupac), or you can deny responsibility for your mistakes, learn nothing, and grow stupider (like O.J.?).
But I still don't quite understand your analogy though. Are you arguing that murdering a tranny who tricks you into sex is justified, and therefore arguing that murdering a minor who tricks you into sex is also justified? What are you actually arguing?