"Black Roots Science" .... Let's talk about it...

[KTULU IS BACK]

what the fuck is up with all the anti-semitism on this site. You guys are fucking pieces of shit and should die a slow death, you hitler-esque pieces of shit.

its because hitler was black, there was a thread on it

 

[memphis]

its because hitler was black, there was a thread on it

Makes sense then

I love the hypocrisy on this site. Everyone derides whitey for their racism, but the majority of racists on this site are black

 

[Swiffness!]

but the majority of racists on this site are black

considering the IC is like 70% black, this actually would make sense

 

[memphis]

considering the IC is like 70% black, this actually would make sense

it's just fucking disgusting reading about 'big nosed jews' or 'kike'.

 

[Swiffness!]

it's just fucking disgusting reading about 'big nosed jews' or 'kike'.

yeah, i don't get that. anti-semitism is a classic feature of White Supremacy and yet so many of these keyboard revolutionary niggas is willin to embrace that shit.

/kanye shrug

 

[Ra_Nkala]

i suggest you start with the most basic astronomy reading material since it sounds like you really dont even know the first thing about the real science of the universe

the aptly titled "the universe in a nutshell" by dr. stephen hawking is good and even has big pictures you can look at

i dnt have to do anything, u made claims, and have yet to show and prove anything except the fact that you are a dick, so your credit is zero

i suggest you read a book on methodology b4 you make another thread

 

[shadb33]

Black Roots Science is the shiznit

 

[And Step]

no

the difference is that modern science documents verifiable evidence to support its claims and doesn't say "we got this knowledge from our ancestors, just trust me"

Wrong. Pick up an astronomy book instead of googling racist websites and maybe you'll learn a thing or two.

Not all the time. Modern Science hasn't determined anything, yet. You do know that scientist disagree on the age of the universe don't you? You know why? Well, it is actually quite simple. They don't know what the fuck they are talmbout. And since arrogance and their credibility, and job are on the line, they just throw up arbritary numbers nestled in scientific jargon, that the general populace can't understand and now you have a "qualified expert". Their figures are constantly changing. Drastically.

How can you verify something that could not be measured because there was no one to record it? And B what evidence do they have? And C who verified it? THEY DON'T HAVE EVIDENCE. They think they have evidence. That is a big, big difference. In a court of law, no Astronomer would make that claim under oath, that what they have is anything other than guess work. Studied. But guess work, nonetheless.

Before the Hubble telescope, the estimates were in the millions. In the nineties, the range was 10-20 billion, which is really amusing. How old is your car? 10-20 years. lol
Now the estimate is 13.7 billion. It will change in a few years, watch. Instead of throwing out estimates, they should fall back and say "We don't know yet we will get back to you". So when it changes in a couple years are you gonna quote that figure too, to try to pass that off as proof of your knowledge?

 

[And Step]

what the fuck is up with all the anti-semitism on this site. You guys are fucking pieces of shit and should die a slow death, you hitler-esque pieces of shit.

Anti semitism is a misnomer and a bigoted term. Black people are Semitic in origin. And most of the people who use the term to describe themselves are not.

It was by design though, so carry on....

 

[ThaChozenWun]

Not all the time. Modern Science hasn't determined anything, yet. You do know that scientist disagree on the age of the universe don't you? You know why? Well, it is actually quite simple. They don't know what the fuck they are talmbout. And since arrogance and their credibility, and job are on the line, they just throw up arbritary numbers nestled in scientific jargon, that the general populace can't understand and now you have a "qualified expert". Their figures are constantly changing. Drastically.

How can you verify something that could not be measured because there was no one to record it? And B what evidence do they have? And C who verified it? THEY DON'T HAVE EVIDENCE. They think they have evidence. That is a big, big difference. In a court of law, no Astronomer would make that claim under oath, that what they have is anything other than guess work. Studied. But guess work, nonetheless.

Before the Hubble telescope, the estimates were in the millions. In the nineties, the range was 10-20 billion, which is really amusing. How old is your car? 10-20 years. lol
Now the estimate is 13.7 billion. It will change in a few years, watch. Instead of throwing out estimates, they should fall back and say "We don't know yet we will get back to you". So when it changes in a couple years are you gonna quote that figure too, to try to pass that off as proof of your knowledge?

Actually it is 4.5 billion years old. The 13.7 is the universe.

And there is proof.

I know you probably don't believe in radometric dating but the oldest rocks we have discovered date back to about 3.9 billion years. Which coincides with the BBT because the Earth in its beginning would have been completely molten. That isn't the sure fire way but it does establish the lower limit which means it is at least 4 billion years old.

The more meaningful way is by measuring pb/pb Isochron age. Most of this dating comes from meteorites which all lead to around the 4.5 mark.

Whenever Lunar Rocks, Earths rocks, and Meteorites all coincide with the same time frame it's hard to argue with that.

And who argues with it's date outside of Black Roots, Creationists, Scientology, and Young Earth creationists? I think the general consensus among the scientific community is that it is in fact about 4.5 billion years old.

 

[And Step]

Actually it is 4.5 billion years old. The 13.7 is the universe.

And there is proof.

I know you probably don't believe in radometric dating but the oldest rocks we have discovered date back to about 3.9 billion years. Which coincides with the BBT because the Earth in its beginning would have been completely molten. That isn't the sure fire way but it does establish the lower limit which means it is at least 4 billion years old.

The more meaningful way is by measuring pb/pb Isochron age. Most of this dating comes from meteorites which all lead to around the 4.5 mark.

Whenever Lunar Rocks, Earths rocks, and Meteorites all coincide with the same time frame it's hard to argue with that.

And who argues with it's date outside of Black Roots, Creationists, Scientology, and Young Earth creationists? I think the general consensus among the scientific community is that it is in fact about 4.5 billion years old.

I was speaking of the universe not the Earth. The term General Consensus is meaningless. Most Western minds thought the Earth was flat and persecuted anyone who thought otherwise.

If I asked most people on this board to actually show me the technology and how it works,and how they came to the mathematical conclusions they did. They couldn't do it. Intellectual pigs most of us are. We eat up everything with no filtering process to separate the truth from the falsehood.

So basically what your saying is the age depends upon a method admittedly not perfect or absolute and the earliest artifact they could find, not that exist but could find?

I'm cool..I'll wait....................

 

[And Step]

I'm not against Science. True Science. Not this linear approach to the explanation of all things.

But I don't think anyone, Black People in particular, should take what they say on face value, because well.. how can I say this..... them niggas lie.

 

[oliverlang]

them niggas lie.

Who doesnt?

 

[And Step]

Who doesnt?

Im speaking specifically, not generally.

 

[oliverlang]

Im speaking specifically, not generally.

So am I...specifically, who doesn't lie?

 

[And Step]

So am I...specifically, who doesn't lie?

Don't know. Don't care.

We were talking about scientists who have been known to fudge and hedge and present their "findings" as truth or facts.

Stick to the subject matter at hand, then maybe I won't have to son you as often. Hah!

 

[oliverlang]

Don't know. Don't care.

We were talking about scientists who have been known to fudge and hedge and present their "findings" as truth or facts.

Stick to the subject matter at hand, then maybe I won't have to son you as often. Hah!

In your own words...

Translation: You called my bluff and pulled my card. Rather than man up and admit you have a point, I rather bitch up and play the lurking virus and identity theft card.

however in this case, it would be the "don't know don't care" card. haha.

 

[And Step]

In your own words...

however in this case, it would be the "don't know don't care" card. haha.

I could see how you can say that ....maybe...... except for the fact that I used the word "them" as referring to the scientists.

So you know...............

I feel like Mayer Rothschild and King Fahd. I got a lot of sons.

Besides to lie is an illusion because there are no absolutes.

LOL.

 

[ThaChozenWun]

I was speaking of the universe not the Earth. The term General Consensus is meaningless. Most Western minds thought the Earth was flat and persecuted anyone who thought otherwise.

If I asked most people on this board to actually show me the technology and how it works,and how they came to the mathematical conclusions they did. They couldn't do it. Intellectual pigs most of us are. We eat up everything with no filtering process to separate the truth from the falsehood.

So basically what your saying is the age depends upon a method admittedly not perfect or absolute and the earliest artifact they could find, not that exist but could find?

I'm cool..I'll wait....................

LOL Nigga everyone thought the world was flat, not just "western" minds.

And this is where you lose yourself. It is true radiometric and carbon dating aren't fool proof, however they are accurate to within a 3,000 year period. And we are speaking the difference of trillions of years not thousands. But lets just say they are completely wrong and both radiometric and carbon dating are completely wrong, where is the evidence that Isochron testing is wrong?

The only valid argument you could have against Isochron testing is that because at a certain time meteors die and disappear just as the longest living trees only have 5,000 year life spans.

But there is much more that has been used to try and determine the age of the Earth and the universe.

And from what I have seen your only version of true science is from black people who preach supreme mathematics and believe white people are created in a laboratory.

 

[Ra_Nkala]

LOL Nigga everyone thought the world was flat, not just "western" minds.

no just Eurasia i believe