Bill Gates: There's no scientific explanation of how it (the universe) came about!

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Oceanic ;6892438 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892425 said:
Oceanic ;6892420 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892413 said:
Oceanic ;6892402 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892389 said:
A fish has the opportunity to decide it wants to leave water, survive on land, grow legs

20090228-giant_mudskipper-scaled-10001.jpg

Show me the fish growing legs. Oh yeah that's how God created it. Never mind.

Evolution doesn't occur over the course of minutes.

Right, because it happens over the course of billions of years which in fact no one has ever witnessed it taking place.

Sounds credible......shaq face

We have thru the fossil record and many skeletons today show vestigial remnants of appendages that were once in use but no longer are.

DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892424 said:
Oceanic ;6892418 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892409 said:
Oceanic ;6892391 said:
J-Breezy;6892385 said:
Oceanic ;6892360 said:
And evolution doesn't consciously change one species into something else so it can't just break down a pig and put it back together as some new form Willy nilly

Aaaaand why not?

Evolution says we evolved from single cell organisms into multi cell organisms.

In fact how did this happen? Real question btw

Science tells us that you need life to create life.

You take some dna from here and some dna from over there put it together and BOOM you have life.

That is an undisputable fact

At what point was this single cell organism able to create all kinds of life from itself?

Even if it did reproduce (assuming it was asexual) wouldn't its offspring have the same genetic makeup?

Single cell + single cell = multi cellular organism??

I thought if you mate two organisms you were going to get a copy, not something else.

wait, what?

Bruh, I said that evolution doesn't consciously make decisions to create a species. In other words, there is no person controlling evolution .. Nature does not work toward an end goal and on the flipside, animals don't consciously decide their evolutionary paths as you suggested. A pig can't DECIDE that he wants to fly and boom, pigs grow wings.

So who tells the fish to leave its natural habitat, somehow finagle it's way on land, some how survive on land, somehow grow legs?

No one tells it to.

So if no one is directing the fish to leave its natural habitat, why would said fish leave?

Anything that would cause a water dwelling animal to move closer to land, for example shallower waters. Animals that

had the propensity to move around better would survive and have children that carried on their traits.

Fish swims in ocean that comprises 75% of the earth, but yet fish says ocean isn't big enough for me to have genetically gifted offspring. I got a bright idea, says fish, I will move on land where I will better thrive and one day morph into a zebra!

ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!

 
Oceanic ;6892442 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892434 said:
Oceanic ;6892423 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892412 said:
Oceanic ;6892394 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892386 said:
atribecalledgabi;6892375 said:
for my own sanity...the problem people are having with evolution is just about the beginning of species right?

people ain't denying the observable changes...like poaching causing elephants to not have tusks...wolves to dogs & shit like that right?

Micro evolution can be observed. It's a change (watch this now) within a species!

Macro evolution has never been observed, will never be observed, and can never be observed because it is a LIE. One species doesn't morph, evolve, change, or teleport into a completely different species because of (whatever) factors you won't to throw out there. It just does not happen.

God created everything thing after their own KIND! That is why Adam could not find someone who was "like him" when he named all the animals.

Amen.

if micro evolution can occur, so can macro evolution.

all it takes is one small change to cause speciation.

If humans can some how evoke to grow gills we can live in the water as well. All it takes is one small change to cause speciation! You know kind of like this

image.jpg

Just because an animal can swim doesn't mean it needs gills.

Still waiting for you to show me a fish that is living in water grow legs and survive on land.

mudskipper-05a22014.jpg

Gods creation is beautiful ain't it?

 
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892441 said:
atribecalledgabi;6892437 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892431 said:
atribecalledgabi;6892430 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892386 said:
atribecalledgabi;6892375 said:
for my own sanity...the problem people are having with evolution is just about the beginning of species right?

people ain't denying the observable changes...like poaching causing elephants to not have tusks...wolves to dogs & shit like that right?

Micro evolution can be observed. It's a change (watch this now) within a species!

Macro evolution has never been observed, will never be observed, and can never be observed because it is a LIE. One species doesn't morph, evolve, change, or teleport into a completely different species because of (whatever) factors you won't to throw out there. It just does not happen.

God created everything thing after their own KIND! That is why Adam could not find someone who was "like him" when he named all the animals.

Amen.

dogs & wolves are different species...

it takes many many generations for speciation to occur. of course nobody lived that long to sit & record the beginning to end. what's your point?

the bolded sounds like god being used to fill in blanks again...

Wolves and Dogs are of the same kind. They both belong to the canidae family. So your argument is not valid. Amen.

i'm going off what YOU said bruh. YOU said species. now it's different families. lol

anyway...they're still a different. try to mate a boston terrier with a coyote. you won't get an offspring because they're too genetically different. you'd get the same result if you tried to mate a dog with a bear.

What? God made everything after their own "kind". Wolves are of the same "kind" as dogs. You can't be this ignorant, I hope.

That is why only 2 wolves were needed on the arc and not every "kind" of dog breed.

I know you got some

Level of intelligence about yourself, think for a minute will you?

Semantics or nah?
 
atribecalledgabi;6892452 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892441 said:
atribecalledgabi;6892437 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892431 said:
atribecalledgabi;6892430 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892386 said:
atribecalledgabi;6892375 said:
for my own sanity...the problem people are having with evolution is just about the beginning of species right?

people ain't denying the observable changes...like poaching causing elephants to not have tusks...wolves to dogs & shit like that right?

Micro evolution can be observed. It's a change (watch this now) within a species!

Macro evolution has never been observed, will never be observed, and can never be observed because it is a LIE. One species doesn't morph, evolve, change, or teleport into a completely different species because of (whatever) factors you won't to throw out there. It just does not happen.

God created everything thing after their own KIND! That is why Adam could not find someone who was "like him" when he named all the animals.

Amen.

dogs & wolves are different species...

it takes many many generations for speciation to occur. of course nobody lived that long to sit & record the beginning to end. what's your point?

the bolded sounds like god being used to fill in blanks again...

Wolves and Dogs are of the same kind. They both belong to the canidae family. So your argument is not valid. Amen.

i'm going off what YOU said bruh. YOU said species. now it's different families. lol

anyway...they're still a different. try to mate a boston terrier with a coyote. you won't get an offspring because they're too genetically different. you'd get the same result if you tried to mate a dog with a bear.

What? God made everything after their own "kind". Wolves are of the same "kind" as dogs. You can't be this ignorant, I hope.

That is why only 2 wolves were needed on the arc and not every "kind" of dog breed.

I know you got some

Level of intelligence about yourself, think for a minute will you?

Semantics or nah?

I ain't the one trying to build a mountain out of a mole hill. Ya dig?
 
What's the difference between acne and a Catholic Priest?

Acne usually comes on a boys face AFTER he turns twelve.

hqdefault.jpg
[/img]
 
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892445 said:
Oceanic ;6892438 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892425 said:
Oceanic ;6892420 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892413 said:
Oceanic ;6892402 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892389 said:
A fish has the opportunity to decide it wants to leave water, survive on land, grow legs

20090228-giant_mudskipper-scaled-10001.jpg

Show me the fish growing legs. Oh yeah that's how God created it. Never mind.

Evolution doesn't occur over the course of minutes.

Right, because it happens over the course of billions of years which in fact no one has ever witnessed it taking place.

Sounds credible......shaq face

We have thru the fossil record and many skeletons today show vestigial remnants of appendages that were once in use but no longer are.

DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892424 said:
Oceanic ;6892418 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892409 said:
Oceanic ;6892391 said:
J-Breezy;6892385 said:
Oceanic ;6892360 said:
And evolution doesn't consciously change one species into something else so it can't just break down a pig and put it back together as some new form Willy nilly

Aaaaand why not?

Evolution says we evolved from single cell organisms into multi cell organisms.

In fact how did this happen? Real question btw

Science tells us that you need life to create life.

You take some dna from here and some dna from over there put it together and BOOM you have life.

That is an undisputable fact

At what point was this single cell organism able to create all kinds of life from itself?

Even if it did reproduce (assuming it was asexual) wouldn't its offspring have the same genetic makeup?

Single cell + single cell = multi cellular organism??

I thought if you mate two organisms you were going to get a copy, not something else.

wait, what?

Bruh, I said that evolution doesn't consciously make decisions to create a species. In other words, there is no person controlling evolution .. Nature does not work toward an end goal and on the flipside, animals don't consciously decide their evolutionary paths as you suggested. A pig can't DECIDE that he wants to fly and boom, pigs grow wings.

So who tells the fish to leave its natural habitat, somehow finagle it's way on land, some how survive on land, somehow grow legs?

No one tells it to.

So if no one is directing the fish to leave its natural habitat, why would said fish leave?

Anything that would cause a water dwelling animal to move closer to land, for example shallower waters. Animals that

had the propensity to move around better would survive and have children that carried on their traits.

Fish swims in ocean that comprises 75% of the earth, but yet fish says ocean isn't big enough for me to have genetically gifted offspring. I got a bright idea, says fish, I will move on land where I will better thrive and one day morph into a zebra!

ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!

There are smaller bodies of water than an ocean.
 
When my military buddy came back home from the Middle East, I asked him, "How do I pick up a Muslim girl?"

He told me, "With a broom and dust pan."

photo_verybig_156832.jpg


9acf46eba879705e9ff0f3c7a288cb88.jpg


Now that one was probably too much.

 
Last edited:
Oceanic ;6892456 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892445 said:
Oceanic ;6892438 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892425 said:
Oceanic ;6892420 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892413 said:
Oceanic ;6892402 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892389 said:
A fish has the opportunity to decide it wants to leave water, survive on land, grow legs

20090228-giant_mudskipper-scaled-10001.jpg

Show me the fish growing legs. Oh yeah that's how God created it. Never mind.

Evolution doesn't occur over the course of minutes.

Right, because it happens over the course of billions of years which in fact no one has ever witnessed it taking place.

Sounds credible......shaq face

We have thru the fossil record and many skeletons today show vestigial remnants of appendages that were once in use but no longer are.

DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892424 said:
Oceanic ;6892418 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892409 said:
Oceanic ;6892391 said:
J-Breezy;6892385 said:
Oceanic ;6892360 said:
And evolution doesn't consciously change one species into something else so it can't just break down a pig and put it back together as some new form Willy nilly

Aaaaand why not?

Evolution says we evolved from single cell organisms into multi cell organisms.

In fact how did this happen? Real question btw

Science tells us that you need life to create life.

You take some dna from here and some dna from over there put it together and BOOM you have life.

That is an undisputable fact

At what point was this single cell organism able to create all kinds of life from itself?

Even if it did reproduce (assuming it was asexual) wouldn't its offspring have the same genetic makeup?

Single cell + single cell = multi cellular organism??

I thought if you mate two organisms you were going to get a copy, not something else.

wait, what?

Bruh, I said that evolution doesn't consciously make decisions to create a species. In other words, there is no person controlling evolution .. Nature does not work toward an end goal and on the flipside, animals don't consciously decide their evolutionary paths as you suggested. A pig can't DECIDE that he wants to fly and boom, pigs grow wings.

So who tells the fish to leave its natural habitat, somehow finagle it's way on land, some how survive on land, somehow grow legs?

No one tells it to.

So if no one is directing the fish to leave its natural habitat, why would said fish leave?

Anything that would cause a water dwelling animal to move closer to land, for example shallower waters. Animals that

had the propensity to move around better would survive and have children that carried on their traits.

Fish swims in ocean that comprises 75% of the earth, but yet fish says ocean isn't big enough for me to have genetically gifted offspring. I got a bright idea, says fish, I will move on land where I will better thrive and one day morph into a zebra!

ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!

There are smaller bodies of water than an ocean.

The premise is still absurd regardless of how you try to justify it. Fish don't grow legs, survive on land, and morph into elephants. It's absolute madness!
 
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892461 said:
Oceanic ;6892456 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892445 said:
Oceanic ;6892438 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892425 said:
Oceanic ;6892420 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892413 said:
Oceanic ;6892402 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892389 said:
A fish has the opportunity to decide it wants to leave water, survive on land, grow legs

20090228-giant_mudskipper-scaled-10001.jpg

Show me the fish growing legs. Oh yeah that's how God created it. Never mind.

Evolution doesn't occur over the course of minutes.

Right, because it happens over the course of billions of years which in fact no one has ever witnessed it taking place.

Sounds credible......shaq face

We have thru the fossil record and many skeletons today show vestigial remnants of appendages that were once in use but no longer are.

DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892424 said:
Oceanic ;6892418 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892409 said:
Oceanic ;6892391 said:
J-Breezy;6892385 said:
Oceanic ;6892360 said:
And evolution doesn't consciously change one species into something else so it can't just break down a pig and put it back together as some new form Willy nilly

Aaaaand why not?

Evolution says we evolved from single cell organisms into multi cell organisms.

In fact how did this happen? Real question btw

Science tells us that you need life to create life.

You take some dna from here and some dna from over there put it together and BOOM you have life.

That is an undisputable fact

At what point was this single cell organism able to create all kinds of life from itself?

Even if it did reproduce (assuming it was asexual) wouldn't its offspring have the same genetic makeup?

Single cell + single cell = multi cellular organism??

I thought if you mate two organisms you were going to get a copy, not something else.

wait, what?

Bruh, I said that evolution doesn't consciously make decisions to create a species. In other words, there is no person controlling evolution .. Nature does not work toward an end goal and on the flipside, animals don't consciously decide their evolutionary paths as you suggested. A pig can't DECIDE that he wants to fly and boom, pigs grow wings.

So who tells the fish to leave its natural habitat, somehow finagle it's way on land, some how survive on land, somehow grow legs?

No one tells it to.

So if no one is directing the fish to leave its natural habitat, why would said fish leave?

Anything that would cause a water dwelling animal to move closer to land, for example shallower waters. Animals that

had the propensity to move around better would survive and have children that carried on their traits.

Fish swims in ocean that comprises 75% of the earth, but yet fish says ocean isn't big enough for me to have genetically gifted offspring. I got a bright idea, says fish, I will move on land where I will better thrive and one day morph into a zebra!

ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!

There are smaller bodies of water than an ocean.

The premise is still absurd regardless of how you try to justify it. Fish don't grow legs, survive on land, and morph into elephants. It's absolute madness!

Yeah, I know right. They turn into amphibians.

 
Oceanic ;6892465 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892461 said:
Oceanic ;6892456 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892445 said:
Oceanic ;6892438 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892425 said:
Oceanic ;6892420 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892413 said:
Oceanic ;6892402 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892389 said:
A fish has the opportunity to decide it wants to leave water, survive on land, grow legs

20090228-giant_mudskipper-scaled-10001.jpg

Show me the fish growing legs. Oh yeah that's how God created it. Never mind.

Evolution doesn't occur over the course of minutes.

Right, because it happens over the course of billions of years which in fact no one has ever witnessed it taking place.

Sounds credible......shaq face

We have thru the fossil record and many skeletons today show vestigial remnants of appendages that were once in use but no longer are.

DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892424 said:
Oceanic ;6892418 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892409 said:
Oceanic ;6892391 said:
J-Breezy;6892385 said:
Oceanic ;6892360 said:
And evolution doesn't consciously change one species into something else so it can't just break down a pig and put it back together as some new form Willy nilly

Aaaaand why not?

Evolution says we evolved from single cell organisms into multi cell organisms.

In fact how did this happen? Real question btw

Science tells us that you need life to create life.

You take some dna from here and some dna from over there put it together and BOOM you have life.

That is an undisputable fact

At what point was this single cell organism able to create all kinds of life from itself?

Even if it did reproduce (assuming it was asexual) wouldn't its offspring have the same genetic makeup?

Single cell + single cell = multi cellular organism??

I thought if you mate two organisms you were going to get a copy, not something else.

wait, what?

Bruh, I said that evolution doesn't consciously make decisions to create a species. In other words, there is no person controlling evolution .. Nature does not work toward an end goal and on the flipside, animals don't consciously decide their evolutionary paths as you suggested. A pig can't DECIDE that he wants to fly and boom, pigs grow wings.

So who tells the fish to leave its natural habitat, somehow finagle it's way on land, some how survive on land, somehow grow legs?

No one tells it to.

So if no one is directing the fish to leave its natural habitat, why would said fish leave?

Anything that would cause a water dwelling animal to move closer to land, for example shallower waters. Animals that

had the propensity to move around better would survive and have children that carried on their traits.

Fish swims in ocean that comprises 75% of the earth, but yet fish says ocean isn't big enough for me to have genetically gifted offspring. I got a bright idea, says fish, I will move on land where I will better thrive and one day morph into a zebra!

ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!

There are smaller bodies of water than an ocean.

The premise is still absurd regardless of how you try to justify it. Fish don't grow legs, survive on land, and morph into elephants. It's absolute madness!

Yeah, I know right. They turn into amphibians.

Oh that really makes it plausible now! Look frogs and snakes turning into flying wombats, gorillas, and kangaroos!

That makes sense!
 
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892468 said:
Oceanic ;6892465 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892461 said:
Oceanic ;6892456 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892445 said:
Oceanic ;6892438 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892425 said:
Oceanic ;6892420 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892413 said:
Oceanic ;6892402 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892389 said:
A fish has the opportunity to decide it wants to leave water, survive on land, grow legs

20090228-giant_mudskipper-scaled-10001.jpg

Show me the fish growing legs. Oh yeah that's how God created it. Never mind.

Evolution doesn't occur over the course of minutes.

Right, because it happens over the course of billions of years which in fact no one has ever witnessed it taking place.

Sounds credible......shaq face

We have thru the fossil record and many skeletons today show vestigial remnants of appendages that were once in use but no longer are.

DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892424 said:
Oceanic ;6892418 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892409 said:
Oceanic ;6892391 said:
J-Breezy;6892385 said:
Oceanic ;6892360 said:
And evolution doesn't consciously change one species into something else so it can't just break down a pig and put it back together as some new form Willy nilly

Aaaaand why not?

Evolution says we evolved from single cell organisms into multi cell organisms.

In fact how did this happen? Real question btw

Science tells us that you need life to create life.

You take some dna from here and some dna from over there put it together and BOOM you have life.

That is an undisputable fact

At what point was this single cell organism able to create all kinds of life from itself?

Even if it did reproduce (assuming it was asexual) wouldn't its offspring have the same genetic makeup?

Single cell + single cell = multi cellular organism??

I thought if you mate two organisms you were going to get a copy, not something else.

wait, what?

Bruh, I said that evolution doesn't consciously make decisions to create a species. In other words, there is no person controlling evolution .. Nature does not work toward an end goal and on the flipside, animals don't consciously decide their evolutionary paths as you suggested. A pig can't DECIDE that he wants to fly and boom, pigs grow wings.

So who tells the fish to leave its natural habitat, somehow finagle it's way on land, some how survive on land, somehow grow legs?

No one tells it to.

So if no one is directing the fish to leave its natural habitat, why would said fish leave?

Anything that would cause a water dwelling animal to move closer to land, for example shallower waters. Animals that

had the propensity to move around better would survive and have children that carried on their traits.

Fish swims in ocean that comprises 75% of the earth, but yet fish says ocean isn't big enough for me to have genetically gifted offspring. I got a bright idea, says fish, I will move on land where I will better thrive and one day morph into a zebra!

ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!

There are smaller bodies of water than an ocean.

The premise is still absurd regardless of how you try to justify it. Fish don't grow legs, survive on land, and morph into elephants. It's absolute madness!

Yeah, I know right. They turn into amphibians.

Oh that really makes it plausible now! Look frogs and snakes turning into flying wombats, gorillas, and kangaroos!

That makes sense!

It doesn't cuz frogs and snakes evolved into neither one of those.

 
Oceanic ;6892474 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892468 said:
Oceanic ;6892465 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892461 said:
Oceanic ;6892456 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892445 said:
Oceanic ;6892438 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892425 said:
Oceanic ;6892420 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892413 said:
Oceanic ;6892402 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892389 said:
A fish has the opportunity to decide it wants to leave water, survive on land, grow legs

20090228-giant_mudskipper-scaled-10001.jpg

Show me the fish growing legs. Oh yeah that's how God created it. Never mind.

Evolution doesn't occur over the course of minutes.

Right, because it happens over the course of billions of years which in fact no one has ever witnessed it taking place.

Sounds credible......shaq face

We have thru the fossil record and many skeletons today show vestigial remnants of appendages that were once in use but no longer are.

DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892424 said:
Oceanic ;6892418 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892409 said:
Oceanic ;6892391 said:
J-Breezy;6892385 said:
Oceanic ;6892360 said:
And evolution doesn't consciously change one species into something else so it can't just break down a pig and put it back together as some new form Willy nilly

Aaaaand why not?

Evolution says we evolved from single cell organisms into multi cell organisms.

In fact how did this happen? Real question btw

Science tells us that you need life to create life.

You take some dna from here and some dna from over there put it together and BOOM you have life.

That is an undisputable fact

At what point was this single cell organism able to create all kinds of life from itself?

Even if it did reproduce (assuming it was asexual) wouldn't its offspring have the same genetic makeup?

Single cell + single cell = multi cellular organism??

I thought if you mate two organisms you were going to get a copy, not something else.

wait, what?

Bruh, I said that evolution doesn't consciously make decisions to create a species. In other words, there is no person controlling evolution .. Nature does not work toward an end goal and on the flipside, animals don't consciously decide their evolutionary paths as you suggested. A pig can't DECIDE that he wants to fly and boom, pigs grow wings.

So who tells the fish to leave its natural habitat, somehow finagle it's way on land, some how survive on land, somehow grow legs?

No one tells it to.

So if no one is directing the fish to leave its natural habitat, why would said fish leave?

Anything that would cause a water dwelling animal to move closer to land, for example shallower waters. Animals that

had the propensity to move around better would survive and have children that carried on their traits.

Fish swims in ocean that comprises 75% of the earth, but yet fish says ocean isn't big enough for me to have genetically gifted offspring. I got a bright idea, says fish, I will move on land where I will better thrive and one day morph into a zebra!

ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!

There are smaller bodies of water than an ocean.

The premise is still absurd regardless of how you try to justify it. Fish don't grow legs, survive on land, and morph into elephants. It's absolute madness!

Yeah, I know right. They turn into amphibians.

Oh that really makes it plausible now! Look frogs and snakes turning into flying wombats, gorillas, and kangaroos!

That makes sense!

It doesn't cuz frogs and snakes evolved into neither one of those.

Amen. A frog is a frog and a snake is a snake. Been like that since God made them at the beginning.

 
Last edited:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892434 said:
Oceanic ;6892423 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892412 said:
Oceanic ;6892394 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892386 said:
atribecalledgabi;6892375 said:
for my own sanity...the problem people are having with evolution is just about the beginning of species right?

people ain't denying the observable changes...like poaching causing elephants to not have tusks...wolves to dogs & shit like that right?

Micro evolution can be observed. It's a change (watch this now) within a species!

Macro evolution has never been observed, will never be observed, and can never be observed because it is a LIE. One species doesn't morph, evolve, change, or teleport into a completely different species because of (whatever) factors you won't to throw out there. It just does not happen.

God created everything thing after their own KIND! That is why Adam could not find someone who was "like him" when he named all the animals.

Amen.

if micro evolution can occur, so can macro evolution.

all it takes is one small change to cause speciation.

If humans can some how evoke to grow gills we can live in the water as well. All it takes is one small change to cause speciation! You know kind of like this

image.jpg

Just because an animal can swim doesn't mean it needs gills.

Still waiting for you to show me a fish that is living in water grow legs and survive on land.

Oh i posted a mud skipper and saw it was posted but still overlooked regardless of requesting such evidence. Ah well. This thread wasn't moved yet? smh at the bias.
 
Last edited:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892480 said:
Oceanic ;6892475 said:
DoUwant2go2Heaven?;6892469 said:
Oceanic ;6892467 said:
..and then reptiles to mammals or birds

I want to see the receipts!

You have to able to do the math before you can understand what's on the receipt.

God did the math for me.

"In the beginning God........."

Amen.

I'll do you one better; show me God creating a mudskipper.

I'll wait. I'm pretty patient.
 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
694
Views
17
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…