kingblaze84
New member
shootemwon;737970 said:I struggle between feeling that Obama is really the one dropping the ball and believing that the problems are so systemic that Obama has no realistic option but to play into the bullshit. But ultimately, leadership is about overcoming systemic barriers to progress, and Obama has shown that he knows what is right, but he's not willing to confront systemic challenges head on to do what he knows should be done. In that sense, he's a brilliant guy and a great leader for a movement (as we saw during the campaign) but he's not a leader when it comes to actually getting the job done
Perhaps we would have been better off with Obama remaining in the Senate as the leader of a strong American progressive movement, putting pressure on someone else who holds the Presidency. I say this because, now that he's in office, it's clear that he's not doing anything different than what you would get with someone like Hillary (for example), so wouldn't he be a more valuable force for change if he was still SENATOR Obama who commanded an army of supporters and activists united for real progress? Just a thought. Of course, if Obama had a little more testicular fortitude, he could still embody that movement while ALSO being President.
Obama would have been a much better President than Hillary Clinton. Don't forget that she shamefully voted for the war in Iraq, smfh......that vote brought her down in 2008.
With that being said, you are right for the most part. That last line you said especially is powerful, although it is very difficult to create change when there are so many crooks and gangsters in government, amongst Democrats and Republicans. I do feel he is better off being President than just being a Senator who is constantly agitating for change. As President, he has much more power than he did as Senator.....I doubt healthcare reform would have been passed if he was just begging Hillary Clinton for it. Keep in mind Hillary failed in helping Bill pass reform back in the 90s.
Some days, I wonder if Obama is afraid to create real change due to a possible assassination if he goes too far in doing so......something we should all at least be open about. The media hates to talk about it, but there is much talk the CIA and Lyndon B Johnson had JFK killed.
http://www.rense.com/general40/thewnk.htm
http://viewzone2.com/lbj/indexx.html
That may enter Obama's mind time to time, I know it would if I was him.
Last edited: