Aye Y'all Know Hillary Clinton is Trash Right?

[IceBergTaylor]

Y'all are lost. The whole voting shit is a game. And y'all keep falling for it. All I know is don't complain when you see Hilary bettering the lives of the elite, more black lives being lost, the "promise" to do away with private prisons is either not resolved or it just evolves into a more sophisticated way of mass incarceration. Our schools won't get any better. Nothing will really change but hey "I'm just voting for the lesser of two evils cause shit, my vote means something"

 

[IceBergTaylor]

Dead ass, I wonder what some of you guys would say to Huey, Fred Hampton or Malcolm if they were still alive today. Not assuming what they would say, but i'm inclined to believe they wouldn't be on some "voting for the lesser evil" shit much less even voting period.

 

[D. Morgan]

Y'all are lost. The whole voting shit is a game. And y'all keep falling for it. All I know is don't complain when you see Hilary bettering the lives of the elite, more black lives being lost, the "promise" to do away with private prisons is either not resolved or it just evolves into a more sophisticated way of mass incarceration. Our schools won't get any better. Nothing will really change but hey "I'm just voting for the lesser of two evils cause shit, my vote means something"

I honestly don't blame that shit on the government. That is a community issue IMO. Also no where in the constitution does even say its the responsibility of the government to educate our children let alone provide them a quality education.

Also why would we as black people expect this white run country to provide our black children with a quality education?

That goes against everything they are doing and trying to do to us in this country.

 

[blackrain]

If you need to win the popular vote in order to get the electoral college votes then by definition the popular vote isn't worthless. That's not hard to figure out. If you can't have one without the other then it has a point to it. They don't just randomly decide who gets the electoral college votes nor is there a separate vote for the electoral college only...which is seems some of y'all think happens

 

[5th Letter]

If you need to win the popular vote in order to get the electoral college votes then by definition the popular vote isn't worthless. That's not hard to figure out. If you can't have one without the other then it has a point to it. They don't just randomly decide who gets the electoral college votes nor is there a separate vote for the electoral college only...which is seems some of y'all think happens

Except that the popular vote has no credence to how the electoral college votes for the president. Don't believe me? Google it, yahoo it, bing it.

 

[5th Letter]

There is no Constitutional provision or Federal law that requires Electors to vote according to the results of the popular vote in their states. Some states, however, require Electors to cast their votes according to the popular vote. These pledges fall into two categories—Electors bound by state law and those bound by pledges to political parties.

 

[xxCivicxx]

@xxCivicxx

You are dumb ass fuck. The popular vote does matter you stupid fuck. In order to win the Presidency you have to eclipse 270 electoral votes. In order to win electoral votes you have to win the popular vote FOR THAT STATE!!!!

Now pay attention you stupid muthafucka

In the state of California there are 55 electoral votes at stake. In order to get those very critical 55 electoral votes to go towards your 270 you need to first win the popular vote in that state. You know the popular vote you keep saying doesn't matter you dumb ass nigga, well it does matter. It doesn't matter if you win the popular vote in California by twenty votes or two million votes, you will get 55 electoral votes for it. Lets say Hillary has 3 million votes in Cali and Trump only has 1 million. She gets all 55 electoral votes.

No pay attention muthafucka. Let's say Trump then wins three more states that total more than 55 electoral votes but less than 1 million popular votes. He would be ahead in the election because of the number of electoral votes. So let's say those three states totaled 70 electoral votes. If he wins all three of those states he would be winning the election by 15 electoral votes but losing the popular vote. This is where you keep saying "See, the popular vote doesn't matter" No dumb ass, winning the popular vote in a state is what gets you the electoral votes in that state. Totaling 270 electoral votes is what wins you the Presidency. THE AMOUNT OF ELECTORAL VOTES VARIES FROM STATE TO STATE. IN ORDER TO WIN ELECTORAL VOTES FOR A STATE YOU MUST FIRST!!!! WIN THE POPULAR VOTE IN THAT STATE.

NOW TAKE YO DUMB ASS TO BED AND STOP TRYING TO BE SOME PSEUDO HIP HOP MESSAGE BOARD POLITICAL INTELLECT

Smh pseudo-intellectuals typing just to see themselves type

AGAIN, YOU JUST ADMITTED IN YOUR OWN POST THAT THE POPULAR VOTE IS NOT RELEVANT

ONCE AGAIN, THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE IS UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO VOTE HOW THE PEOPLE VOTE SIMPLETON

Obviously you are very invested in my posts for some reason. You should actually try humbling yourself and learning from my words smh

 

[xxCivicxx]

The electoral college usually aligns with the popular vote, only 4 times in history did a president lose the popular vote but won the electoral college vote. Most recently in 2000. Each state has a certain number of electoral votes which is completely independent of popular votes. In other words the popular vote is worthless.

What you are implying is misleading.

You are using immaterial semantics to weakly support an argument that gives credence to a conspiracy theory

- that "VOTING is WORTHLESS".

The collective popular vote FOR EACH STATE, is literally CAUSUAL to the calculus involved in detrrmining the OUTCOME of an election.

Do you LIVE in one of the 50 STATES of America???

Or do you and Civic also live in this imaginary universe that you describe in your posts?

If you live in America, than your VOTE has tremendous meaning and value.

It helps DETERMINE the next PRESIDENT of the Untied States...as well as dozens of other elected officials that will impact your life

Again, no

Your vote shows faith in the system

The electoral college decides the next president

 

[5th Letter]

Bottomline is this, do the electoral college vote based on the popular vote? Yes. Does it mean they have to vote based on the popular vote? No. 2000 and the other 3 times in history showed us that the electoral college does not vote based on the popular vote.

 

[xxCivicxx]

I'm not even sure how the conversation got steered this way but I guess it's lesson time
http://www.vox.com/policy-and-polit...college-explained-presidential-elections-2016

Q: How many times was a president elected who did not win the popular vote?

A: It has happened four times.

The 2000 election was the most recent when the candidate who received the greatest number of electoral votes, and thus won the presidency, didn’t win the popular vote. But this scenario has played out in our nation’s history before.

In 1824, John Quincy Adams was elected president despite not winning either the popular vote or the electoral vote. Andrew Jackson was the winner in both categories. Jackson received 38,000 more popular votes than Adams, and beat him in the electoral vote 99 to 84. Despite his victories, Jackson didn’t reach the majority 131 votes needed in the Electoral College to be declared president. In fact, neither candidate did. The decision went to the House of Representatives, which voted Adams into the White House.

In 1876, Rutherford B. Hayes won the election (by a margin of one electoral vote), but he lost the popular vote by more than 250,000 ballots to Samuel J. Tilden.

In 1888, Benjamin Harrison received 233 electoral votes to Grover Cleveland’s 168, winning the presidency. But Harrison lost the popular vote by more than 90,000 votes.

In 2000, George W. Bush was declared the winner of the general election and became the 43rd president, but he didn’t win the popular vote either. Al Gore holds that distinction, garnering about 540,000 more votes than Bush. However, Bush won the electoral vote, 271 to 266.

 

[Ajackson17]

If people were this adamant about Garveyism focusing on ourselves then we'll be out a lot of our issues.

 

[zzombie]

The real bad thing about Hillary Clinton's presidency will be the fact that she will most likely get to a point a few Supreme Court Justices

Do you understand the horror that is going to create ???? imagine a warlike @DesertRain10 making all the laws

 

[StillFaggyAF]

The real bad thing about Hillary Clinton's presidency will be the fact that she will most likely get to a point a few Supreme Court Justices

Do you understand the horror that is going to create ???? imagine a warlike @DesertRain10 making all the laws

Relax

 

[zzombie]

The real bad thing about Hillary Clinton's presidency will be the fact that she will most likely get to a point a few Supreme Court Justices

Do you understand the horror that is going to create ???? imagine a warlike @DesertRain10 making all the laws

Relax

I am but really if she wins and liberals take control of the Supreme Court the ramifications will be serious

 

[StillFaggyAF]

The real bad thing about Hillary Clinton's presidency will be the fact that she will most likely get to a point a few Supreme Court Justices

Do you understand the horror that is going to create ???? imagine a warlike @DesertRain10 making all the laws

Relax

I am but really if she wins and liberals take control of the Supreme Court the ramifications will be serious

Hilary is not even that left

 

[blackrain]

The real bad thing about Hillary Clinton's presidency will be the fact that she will most likely get to a point a few Supreme Court Justices

Do you understand the horror that is going to create ???? imagine a warlike @DesertRain10 making all the laws

Because the people Trump would appoint would be stand up folks

 

[zzombie]

The real bad thing about Hillary Clinton's presidency will be the fact that she will most likely get to a point a few Supreme Court Justices

Do you understand the horror that is going to create ???? imagine a warlike @DesertRain10 making all the laws

Relax

I am but really if she wins and liberals take control of the Supreme Court the ramifications will be serious

Hilary is not even that left

She will be when it comes to picking Justices especially if it's politically convenient

 

[Guy Gardner]

It may be phony, it may be smoke and mirrors, it may be pandering for votes...whatever, i don't even really like the chick, but at least Hillary is acknowledging and addressing the issues facing our communities....for that she'll get my vote over someone who is basically saying nothing was wrong with the way our people were treated for decades, a dude who took out an ad to push for the death penalty of a falsely accused man...Hillary may not be held accountable for everything, but she has admitted that mass incarcerations and mandatory minimums was a mistake.....at the very least, that puts her ahead of trump

 

[zzombie]

The real bad thing about Hillary Clinton's presidency will be the fact that she will most likely get to a point a few Supreme Court Justices

Do you understand the horror that is going to create ???? imagine a warlike @DesertRain10 making all the laws

Because the people Trump would appoint would be stand up folks

They would be better than her picks in hope you want all that sjw nonsense to become law because that might actually happen now

 

[zzombie]

I'm not saying Trump will be an overall better president however I really don't think people understand what he risks are in electing this woman.