August FBI Memo Called ‘Black Identity Extremists’(BIEs) New Terror Threat…

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Shuffington;c-10027849 said:
Should've known the minute Trump and Bannon linked up.

but those emails tho.

Mfs was too busy asking how is Trump racist and how will his presidency affect Black people and imagining not voting as a valid strategy.

Not to forget Hillary having an email server, saying "super-predator", and all that other dumb shit.

Let's talk about it now.
 
Last edited:
Judge_Judah;7997087 said:
"Domestic terrorist" will soon be a term to describe black people in America...watch....

@Black_Samson if that becomes the case, what doors does that open as far as detainment is concerned?

DentalHappygoluckyKrill-max-1mb.gif
[/img]
 
And Tareeq was part of the non-voting shit. It's cool MFs spreading knowledge now, but that hypocrisy should be kept in mind.

You had MFs essentially making it easy for Trump to win by encouraging not voting and constantly talking about Hillary and the democrats like if the republicans had some kind of better reputation ....

Now these same MFs like 'Oh - Look at what Trump's administration doing !'
 
StoneColdMikey;c-10028117 said:
Someone told me trump is good for Black people.

Right... you also got those MFs who say "Trump is the best thing to happen for Black people" ... with some fuckin dumb ass rationale that Black people needed to be woke or some dumb shit -

Like we haven't been noticing the racism, police brutality, injustice - and all that other shit going on for the last few decades.

MFs like this ain't worth the conversation. It seems like just another way of not admitting they were wrong about Trump, or if they weren't pro Trump - then a way of not accepting the reality and just enjoying the world burn, misery type of MFs.

Ain't no way was it necessary for a "Trump" to be in office for Black people to know that racism exists.

Ask them specifically what action Trump took that benefited Black people ?

Ask 'em the opposite - what has his admin done that will have a negative impact on Black people ?
 
Also look into anti-black persons affiliated with supremacist and hate groups who have infiltrated law enforcement and the military with the same intensity...
 
Its foolish to believe this wouldnt have happened even if hilary did win, you wishful thinking niggas. The attacks on blacks ramped up during a democrats run in the white house, a black president specifically. Stop ignoring that when the lesser evil has shown it simply prefers to stab you in the back. Looks to fall in line with "super predators" even, some sneaky, open ended shit that bitch could of easily done as well. Thats how white supremacist have always operated.

Lets be honest, when was the last time a party had the white house more than 8 years, anyway? Theres no reason to think that pattern would of changed now. A republican was gonna get in there regardless most likely.

The last election was horrible. I didnt vote cause thats what i do when i dont like my poll options. Id do it again, so blame all you want.
 
Last edited:
So let me get this straight we should push aside someone calling black people (black men specifically) super predators because of their political alliance? We should ignore someone who created a bill that has destroyed the black community (that Bernie also cosigned) simply because they are democrats? We should ignore the fact that they collected all that money for Haiti relief and you had Haitians themselves who have complained about not seeing any money or stuff done for them? We should ignore illegal emails and servers created? People that didn't vote knew that both of them were shit candidates who had their own individual faults.
 
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/oct/06/fbi-black-identity-extremists-racial-profiling

FBI terrorism unit says 'black identity extremists' pose a violent threat

Leaked report, citing concerns of retaliation over ‘perceptions of police brutality against African Americans’, prompts fears of crackdown on activists

The US government has declared “black identity extremists” a violent threat, according to a leaked report from the FBI’s counter-terrorism division.

The assessment, obtained by Foreign Policy, has raised fears about federal authorities racially profiling activists and aggressively prosecuting civil rights protesters.

The report, dated August 2017 and compiled by the Domestic Terrorism Analysis Unit, said: “The FBI assesses it is very likely Black Identity Extremist (BIE) perceptions of police brutality against African Americans spurred an increase in premeditated, retaliatory lethal violence against law enforcement and will very likely serve as justification for such violence.” Incidents of “alleged police abuse” have “continued to feed the resurgence in ideologically motivated, violent criminal activity within the BIE movement”.

The FBI’s dedicated surveillance of black activists follows a long history of the US government aggressively monitoring protest movements and working to disrupt civil rights groups, but the scrutiny of African Americans by a domestic terrorism unit was particularly alarming to some free speech campaigners.


“When we talk about enemies of the state and terrorists, with that comes an automatic stripping of those people’s rights to speak and protest,” said Mohammad Tajsar, staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union. “It marginalizes what are legitimate voices within the political debate that are calling for racial and economic justice.”

The document has emerged at a time of growing concerns about Donald Trump’s links to the far right and white nationalists, and increasing anxieties about his administration’s efforts to further criminalize communities of color and shield police from scrutiny. Anti-Trump protesters and Black Lives Matter activists have continued to face harsh prosecutions and close federal monitoring.

The FBI did not immediately respond to the Guardian’s request for comment on Friday, but defended its tracking of “black identity extremists” in a statement to Foreign Policy, claiming the “FBI cannot initiate an investigation based solely on an individual’s race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, or the exercise of First Amendment rights”.


The FBI’s report noted specific cases of recent violence against police, most notably Micah Johnson, a 25-year-old shooter in Dallas who killed five officers and said he was targeting white people and law enforcement. Black Lives Matter – a movement protesting the disproportionate killings of black citizens by police in the US – had no ties to Johnson or other targeted killings of police and has condemned those shootings.

The number of police officers killed on the job also remains a fraction of the number of citizens killed by officers each year, and statistics suggest that more white offenders than black offenders kill officers.

The new FBI report said “BIE violence” peaked in the 1960s and 1970s “in response to changing socioeconomic attitudes and treatment of blacks”, adding that possible indicators today for “BIEs posing a violent threat to law enforcement” include “violent anti-white rhetoric” and “attempts to acquire illegal weapons or explosives”. BIE appears to be a very new term within law enforcement, Foreign Policy noted.

Elsa Waithe, a comedian and activist with Black Lives Matter, said she feared the FBI’s classification could deter people from joining protests and further “criminalize anyone who is already in the movement”.


She noted that she often wears a “black power” button and could easily see the FBI labeling her as a threat as a result: “The term ‘black identity extremist’ is so vague on purpose … If I wanted to do a picnic for black folks, is this now some sort of terrorist activity?”

But law enforcement threats would not discourage her, she said. “This changes nothing. For some people, this means we fight harder.”

Some reports have suggested that the Trump administration has also pushed to focus counter-terrorism efforts solely on Islamist extremism and no longer target white supremacist groups. The president further faced significant backlash in August for saying there were “very fine people” on both sides of a neo-Nazi rally where a civil rights activist was killed by an alleged white nationalist.

The FBI document seemed to be aligned with far-right figures who have increasingly called Black Lives Matter a terrorist group, some comparing it to the Ku Klux Klan, noted Tajsar.


DeRay Mckesson, a prominent Black Lives Matter activist, likened the “black identity extremist” monitoring to the FBI’s highly controversial domestic counterintelligence program known as Cointelpro, which was used to target political groups and activists like the NAACP, Martin Luther King Jr, socialist and communist groups and anti-war protesters.

“We knew that we were likely being watched,” said Mckesson, who has spoken out about being monitored by the US government and FBI. “This is confirmation that the work of social justice continues to threaten those in power.”
 
7figz;c-10028506 said:
And Tareeq was part of the non-voting shit. It's cool MFs spreading knowledge now, but that hypocrisy should be kept in mind.

You had MFs essentially making it easy for Trump to win by encouraging not voting and constantly talking about Hillary and the democrats like if the republicans had some kind of better reputation ....

Now these same MFs like 'Oh - Look at what Trump's administration doing !'

7figz;c-10028523 said:
StoneColdMikey;c-10028117 said:
Someone told me trump is good for Black people.

Right... you also got those MFs who say "Trump is the best thing to happen for Black people" ... with some fuckin dumb ass rationale that Black people needed to be woke or some dumb shit -

Like we haven't been noticing the racism, police brutality, injustice - and all that other shit going on for the last few decades.

MFs like this ain't worth the conversation. It seems like just another way of not admitting they were wrong about Trump, or if they weren't pro Trump - then a way of not accepting the reality and just enjoying the world burn, misery type of MFs.

Ain't no way was it necessary for a "Trump" to be in office for Black people to know that racism exists.

Ask them specifically what action Trump took that benefited Black people ?

Ask 'em the opposite - what has his admin done that will have a negative impact on Black people ?

1u4f24.jpg
 
5th Letter;c-10028593 said:
So let me get this straight we should push aside someone calling black people (black men specifically) super predators because of their political alliance? We should ignore someone who created a bill that has destroyed the black community (that Bernie also cosigned) simply because they are democrats? We should ignore the fact that they collected all that money for Haiti relief and you had Haitians themselves who have complained about not seeing any money or stuff done for them? We should ignore illegal emails and servers created? People that didn't vote knew that both of them were shit candidates who had their own individual faults.

Some of the shit you citing as facts hasn't even been proven to be factual.

Let's go one by one, otherwise you lookin irrational lumping all this shit together and ignoring the comparatively worse MF in office right now.

1. "Super-predators" vs "Terrorists" and no remorse for his call to reinstate the death penalty for innocent for the central park 5, plus making it harder to sue the cops, plus eliminating reviews against civil rights violations by cops by the justice department, plus pardoning Arpaio. The bitch Hillary atleast tried to walk back that super-predator shit when during the campaign. This MF doubling down and making it worse. So drop the "super-predator" shit. Your new shit to be worried about is "terrorist". Get out the past.

2. Ignore someone who created a racist bill that destroyed the Black community. Debatable but don't even have to go that far because that Bill Clinton, not Hillary Clinton.

3. "Because they are democrats". No, genius - because there was a worse republican that would win if the democrats didn't.

4. Collected money for Haiti that some Haitians claimed not to get. You mean like how Puerto Rico is fucked up right now and claiming Trump ain't doing enough, and how he went there and blamed there for their budget and called the mayor "nasty" and dumb shit ? And how MFs in Texas were saying they weren't getting the FEMA money ? But yet the Clinton foundation still received top ratings supposedly. Wait, how about the article saying that Trump's son used some of the money from his charity / foundation to do some non-related shit ?

5. Emails. FOH with shit already Nothing came of the emails and nothing came of the investigation. The worst you can say is it was against some law but the act alone wasn't proven to have caused any direct harm to a single American. If anything, weirdos who just the mere discussion of the a private email server, used the shit against Hilary herself without even having any evidence. Compare this to the actual business activities Trump has with Russia and China. Note shady now-dead Russians who were related to Trump's visits. Note Russian business tenants in Trump's buildings that were being investigated by the FBI.

Nobody said "ignore" shit. But don't be stuck on inaction, or unable to see which one was worse then want to come out here now after seeing Trump doing worse shit and acting like you made the best decision.

You could draw up all the "maybe Hillary would've did just as bad" bullshit you want but it's all hypothetical and based on the same shit that's being proven was part of the Trump+Russian campaign propaganda.

Like I said, MFs ain't worth the conversation. Y'all look especially pathetic when you try to dismiss it as some "Love Hillary" or "Feelings" bullshit when MFs hittin you with facts. Not one MF I ever seen on here even said they even liked the bitch, they just simply stated they knew what would be worse and damn sure is looking worse than atleast the last democrat's admin, might even prove to be worse than Bill Clinton's admin.
 
Last edited:
Facts = feelings... and you a mod ? They must be passing those shits out like MAGA hats.

You gotta come better than that.

Hold your L Trump enabler.... and keep going on about Hillary, that'll prove you knew what you were talmbout. We still waitin to see you and Tareeq's gamble about not-voting pay off.

tenor.gif
 
kzzl;c-10028567 said:
Its foolish to believe this wouldnt have happened even if hilary did win, you wishful thinking niggas. The attacks on blacks ramped up during a democrats run in the white house, a black president specifically. Stop ignoring that when the lesser evil has shown it simply prefers to stab you in the back. Looks to fall in line with "super predators" even, some sneaky, open ended shit that bitch could of easily done as well. Thats how white supremacist have always operated.

Lets be honest, when was the last time a party had the white house more than 8 years, anyway? Theres no reason to think that pattern would of changed now. A republican was gonna get in there regardless most likely.

The last election was horrible. I didnt vote cause thats what i do when i dont like my poll options. Id do it again, so blame all you want.

Nobody can say what would've happened if Hillary won, but the fact is some of the shit people said would happen if Trump won is happening. And some of the shit, like war-mongering, that people said would happen if Hillary won - is actually happening with Trump winning. Trump is fuckin terrible, and MFs need to stop comparing it to how bad they imagine Hillary or another democrat would've been and deal with what is.

My posts about not-voting isn't to individuals who chose not to vote for their own reasons, it's to MFs who encouraged and promoted it to other people as if it was some type of power-move and now talkin shit like they were some kind of oracle.

MF you can't have it both ways - saying Trump was worse, now saying "Look at how bad Trump is".
 
Last edited:
5th Letter;c-10028593 said:
So let me get this straight we should push aside someone calling black people (black men specifically) super predators because of their political alliance? We should ignore someone who created a bill that has destroyed the black community (that Bernie also cosigned) simply because they are democrats? We should ignore the fact that they collected all that money for Haiti relief and you had Haitians themselves who have complained about not seeing any money or stuff done for them? We should ignore illegal emails and servers created? People that didn't vote knew that both of them were shit candidates who had their own individual faults.

Body bag
 
7figz;c-10028690 said:
5th Letter;c-10028593 said:
So let me get this straight we should push aside someone calling black people (black men specifically) super predators because of their political alliance? We should ignore someone who created a bill that has destroyed the black community (that Bernie also cosigned) simply because they are democrats? We should ignore the fact that they collected all that money for Haiti relief and you had Haitians themselves who have complained about not seeing any money or stuff done for them? We should ignore illegal emails and servers created? People that didn't vote knew that both of them were shit candidates who had their own individual faults.

Some of the shit you citing as facts hasn't even been proven to be factual.

Let's go one by one, otherwise you lookin irrational lumping all this shit together and ignoring the comparatively worse MF in office right now.

1. "Super-predators" vs "Terrorists" and no remorse for his call to reinstate the death penalty for innocent for the central park 5, plus making it harder to sue the cops, plus eliminating reviews against civil rights violations by cops by the justice department, plus pardoning Arpaio. The bitch Hillary atleast tried to walk back that super-predator shit when during the campaign. This MF doubling down and making it worse. So drop the "super-predator" shit. Your new shit to be worried about is "terrorist". Get out the past.

2. Ignore someone who created a racist bill that destroyed the Black community. Debatable but don't even have to go that far because that Bill Clinton, not Hillary Clinton.

3. "Because they are democrats". No, genius - because there was a worse republican that would win if the democrats didn't.

4. Collected money for Haiti that some Haitians claimed not to get. You mean like how Puerto Rico is fucked up right now and claiming Trump ain't doing enough, and how he went there and blamed there for their budget and called the mayor "nasty" and dumb shit ? And how MFs in Texas were saying they weren't getting the FEMA money ? But yet the Clinton foundation still received top ratings supposedly. Wait, how about the article saying that Trump's son used some of the money from his charity / foundation to do some non-related shit ?

5. Emails. FOH with shit already Nothing came of the emails and nothing came of the investigation. The worst you can say is it was against some law but the act alone wasn't proven to have cause no direct harm to any single American. If anything, weirdos who just the mere discussion of the a private email server used the shit against Hilary herself without even having any evidence. Compare this to the actual business activities Trump has with Russia and China. Note shady now-dead Russians who were related to Trump's visits. Note Russian business tenants in Trump's buildings that were being investigated by the FBI.

Nobody said "ignore" shit. But don't be stuck on inaction, or unable to see which one was worse then want to come out here now after seeing Trump doing worse shit and acting like you made the best decision.

You could draw up all the "maybe Hillary would've did just as bad" bullshit you want but it's all hypothetical and based on the same shit that's being proven was part of the Trump+Russian campaign propaganda.

Like I said, MFs ain't worth the conversation. Y'all look especially pathetic when you try to dismiss it as some "Love Hillary" or "Feelings" bullshit when MFs hittin you with facts. Not one MF I ever seen on here even said they even liked the bitch, they just simply stated they knew what would be worse and damn sure is looking worse than atleast the last democrat's admin, might even prove to be worse than Bill Clinton's admin.

1. We already know what Trump is about. We know what he is. You think we are surprised by any of the racist things Trump is doing? Really? Trump doesn't need to walk back his racist comments or actions he has his base and he could give a fuck about who's offended. Hillary "walking back those super predator" comments is nothing but game. She's old enough to know what that means and how it's racist.

2. That was a Bill Clinton bill but she cosigned it. Unless I missed it I haven't heard her denounce that bill either. And how is a bill that has caused the mass incarceration of black people especially black men debatable?

3. No based on y'all comments it seems as if y'all are biased towards party rather than looking at the individual candidate. The only difference is that black people would continue to get shitted on but at least Trump has been an equal opportunity offender of other races.

4. See the opening sentences of number 1. White supremacist being a white supremacist don't change the fact that the Clinton foundation fucked over Haitians and pocketed money that was supposed to help them. But I'm supposed to have faith that she would've done stuff for black people in the US?

5. Again Trump being shady doesn't excuse Hillary doing shady things either bruh.

I didn't vote because I didn't like none of the candidates. If someone offered me the choice between vomit and shit (which represented Hillary and Trump) I don't feel like I have to pick one. I decided to pick neither. Hopefully if a better candidate emerges in 2020 I'll gladly vote for that person.
 
a.mann;c-10028758 said:
I could have sworn THIS is what he wanted, when he urged black folks to let Trump win...


This rhetoric was a mistake but at the end of the day it had very litte Impact.. he ain't responsible for trump getting elected
 
Last edited:
5th Letter;c-10028593 said:
So let me get this straight we should push aside someone calling black people (black men specifically) super predators because of their political alliance? We should ignore someone who created a bill that has destroyed the black community (that Bernie also cosigned) simply because they are democrats? We should ignore the fact that they collected all that money for Haiti relief and you had Haitians themselves who have complained about not seeing any money or stuff done for them? We should ignore illegal emails and servers created? People that didn't vote knew that both of them were shit candidates who had their own individual faults.

Wouldn't want to be accused of intentionally being disingenuous and misleading

For those that may have not heard the "super predators" comment in its full context


 

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
178
Views
977
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…