Attorn Eric Holder: Yea Obama Can Clap Niggas With Drones On American Soil

[a.mann]

the Bill of Rights offer protections you have in the criminal justice system, when law enforcement and prosecutors charge you with a crime. You are presumed innocent, have the right to face your accuser, have a jury trial, the government must prove every element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt, etc.

However involving courts and rules of evidence in war-fighting is suicide. And it would be an unconstitutional infringement on the president’s Article II commander-in-chief power in the Constitution.

The Supreme Court precedent makes clear the Bill of Rights and the writ of habeas corpus do not apply to military fighting enemies of the United States. That is an issue of foreign policy, outside the power and the Constitution’s role of the courts.

So for example, if @Amotekun decides to become a radical Islamic jihadist warrior for Al Qaeda, or align himself with any of America's known enemies and hides here in the United States, and begins launching terrorist attacks on this nation,

Obama is well within his rights and power as Commander-In-Chief to do whatever is necessary i.e

launch drones attacks..... to eliminate him and any other threat

 

[Ajackson17]

So can I say I told you so. Yet I got flagged for not voting for him.

 

[Amotekun]

the Bill of Rights offer protections you have in the criminal justice system, when law enforcement and prosecutors charge you with a crime. You are presumed innocent, have the right to face your accuser, have a jury trial, the government must prove every element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt, etc.

However involving courts and rules of evidence in war-fighting is suicide. And it would be an unconstitutional infringement on the president’s Article II commander-in-chief power in the Constitution.

The Supreme Court precedent makes clear the Bill of Rights and the writ of habeas corpus do not apply to military fighting enemies of the United States. That is an issue of foreign policy, outside the power and the Constitution’s role of the courts.

So for example, if @Amotekun decides to become a radical Islamic jihadist warrior for Al Qaeda, or align himself with any of America's known enemies and hides here in the United States, and begins launching terrorist attacks on this nation,

Obama is well within his rights and power as Commander-In-Chief to do whatever is necessary i.e

launch drones attacks..... to eliminate him and any other threat

Wrong the Bill of Rights does not offer protections...

The Bill of Rights acknowledges what is to be considered universal human rights. Unalienable, meaning they cannot be taken away.

The rest of the Constitution is a document listing the specific powers of the government what it can and cannot do. Anything not expressly permitted within the constitution is deemed unconstitutional or outside the purview of that branch of government.

Now if I or anyone else is accused of committing a crime whether it be high treason or petty theft it is the job of the US government to apprehend me or similar persons. It is my right to face a trial by jury where the state presents evidence and I present evidence and the people determine my guilt or innocence based off the evidence and based on whether or not the law is just.

Now in pursuit of threatening a criminal or alleged criminal, if said accused, accused not charged, proves to be a clear and present danger it is within the authority of the magistrates police officials to neutralize that threat. No branch of government or offficials within that government have ever been given authority to be judge jury and executioner of the accused without due process.

It is the right of the accused to face the accusers and have them prove their case.

What government officials have done is completely flip the constitution on its head where the institution has unalienable rights both expressed and implied and the people are subject to ever increasing restrictions.

 

[Shizlansky]

Cops kill folks all the time without due process.

 

[Shizlansky]

Cops kill folks all the time without due process.

 

[Amotekun]

 

[twatgetta]

I wonder how the Obama supporters feel now? Can't find nobody that voted for the housenigga now....lol

 

[Amotekun]

nah niggas still big him up and then kindly gloss over blatant war crimes and shit.

 

[Amotekun]

 

[Go figure]

idk why people cant fathom the possibility of the US government creating excuses to do fucked up shit that push their agenda. u dont have to be a conspiracy theorist nut to know this is just how humans work. it happens in your work place, home, between friends and family. the US government is just a bigger, greater platform with everything at their disposal.

they can use that drone strike to kill any guy who they feel is a threat, hurt innocent people in the strike, then use some terrorism excuse to cover it up or make the guy look like hes crazy.

look how fishy the Chris Dorner coverage was. they can manipulate media into anything they want.

 

[a.mann]

the Bill of Rights offer protections you have in the criminal justice system, when law enforcement and prosecutors charge you with a crime. You are presumed innocent, have the right to face your accuser, have a jury trial, the government must prove every element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt, etc.

However involving courts and rules of evidence in war-fighting is suicide. And it would be an unconstitutional infringement on the president’s Article II commander-in-chief power in the Constitution.

The Supreme Court precedent makes clear the Bill of Rights and the writ of habeas corpus do not apply to military fighting enemies of the United States. That is an issue of foreign policy, outside the power and the Constitution’s role of the courts.

So for example, if @Amotekun decides to become a radical Islamic jihadist warrior for Al Qaeda, or align himself with any of America's known enemies and hides here in the United States, and begins launching terrorist attacks on this nation,

Obama is well within his rights and power as Commander-In-Chief to do whatever is necessary i.e

launch drones attacks..... to eliminate him and any other threat

Wrong the Bill of Rights does not offer protections...

The Bill of Rights acknowledges what is to be considered universal human rights. Unalienable, meaning they cannot be taken away.

The rest of the Constitution is a document listing the specific powers of the government what it can and cannot do. Anything not expressly permitted within the constitution is deemed unconstitutional or outside the purview of that branch of government.

Now if I or anyone else is accused of committing a crime whether it be high treason or petty theft it is the job of the US government to apprehend me or similar persons. It is my right to face a trial by jury where the state presents evidence and I present evidence and the people determine my guilt or innocence based off the evidence and based on whether or not the law is just.

Now in pursuit of threatening a criminal or alleged criminal, if said accused, accused not charged, proves to be a clear and present danger it is within the authority of the magistrates police officials to neutralize that threat. No branch of government or offficials within that government have ever been given authority to be judge jury and executioner of the accused without due process.

It is the right of the accused to face the accusers and have them prove their case.

What government officials have done is completely flip the constitution on its head where the institution has unalienable rights both expressed and implied and the people are subject to ever increasing restrictions.

the Bill of Rights protects an American citizens rights

America is at war with Al Qeada,

once you align yourself with a country's enemies they are at war with,

start plotting to carry out attacks on said country

you are in effect forfeiting whatever liberties and rights aka PROTECTION

that was guaranteed you as a citizen of that country

how does this not make fuckin' sense to some people is beyond me

 

[Mr.LV]

the Bill of Rights offer protections you have in the criminal justice system, when law enforcement and prosecutors charge you with a crime. You are presumed innocent, have the right to face your accuser, have a jury trial, the government must prove every element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt, etc.

However involving courts and rules of evidence in war-fighting is suicide. And it would be an unconstitutional infringement on the president’s Article II commander-in-chief power in the Constitution.

The Supreme Court precedent makes clear the Bill of Rights and the writ of habeas corpus do not apply to military fighting enemies of the United States. That is an issue of foreign policy, outside the power and the Constitution’s role of the courts.

So for example, if @Amotekun decides to become a radical Islamic jihadist warrior for Al Qaeda, or align himself with any of America's known enemies and hides here in the United States, and begins launching terrorist attacks on this nation,

Obama is well within his rights and power as Commander-In-Chief to do whatever is necessary i.e

launch drones attacks..... to eliminate him and any other threat

Wrong the Bill of Rights does not offer protections...

The Bill of Rights acknowledges what is to be considered universal human rights. Unalienable, meaning they cannot be taken away.

The rest of the Constitution is a document listing the specific powers of the government what it can and cannot do. Anything not expressly permitted within the constitution is deemed unconstitutional or outside the purview of that branch of government.

Now if I or anyone else is accused of committing a crime whether it be high treason or petty theft it is the job of the US government to apprehend me or similar persons. It is my right to face a trial by jury where the state presents evidence and I present evidence and the people determine my guilt or innocence based off the evidence and based on whether or not the law is just.

Now in pursuit of threatening a criminal or alleged criminal, if said accused, accused not charged, proves to be a clear and present danger it is within the authority of the magistrates police officials to neutralize that threat. No branch of government or offficials within that government have ever been given authority to be judge jury and executioner of the accused without due process.

It is the right of the accused to face the accusers and have them prove their case.

What government officials have done is completely flip the constitution on its head where the institution has unalienable rights both expressed and implied and the people are subject to ever increasing restrictions.

the Bill of Rights protects an American citizens rights

America is at war with Al Qeada,

once you align yourself with a country's enemies they are at war with,

start plotting to carry out attacks on said country

you are in effect forfeiting whatever liberties and rights aka PROTECTION

that was guaranteed you as a citizen of that country

how does this not make fuckin' sense to some people is beyond me

 

[a.mann]

Do I agree with everything that's going down ?

No.

But the simple fact of the matter is America's fight with Al Qeada and it's affiliates

is not a fuckin' criminal case.

It is a war.

Navy, Army, Marines, Air Force (understand?)

 

[Amotekun]

There. Is. No. Such. Thing. Entity. Organization. Affiliation. Loose Association. Called. Al Qeada. Made Up. Fabricated. Orchestrated. Manufactured.

This is not a war. The people int he Middle East are fighting a War. America is engaging in Neo-colonialism/imperialism/hostile corporate take over.

 

[bgoat]

I'm not worried about being attacked by a fucking drone. So exactly why are y'all worried? Are y'all doing some terrorist type shit? Y'all act like the government is flying a drone around randomly selecting niggas and hunting them down.

 

[Amotekun]

 

[a.mann]

I understand what you trying to say here

But have you ever been to the Middle East??

Do you even possess a valid passport?

it's a relevant question(s)