ARE YOU F***IING KIDDING ME????????? UPDATE: She cashed the check.

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
The nanny should get half of what she gets cuz i know that bitch aint raise her kids without one. And i doubt that she cooked and cleaned, did any wifely duties.
 
Your whole argument, @kat Stacks is bullshit, and I'll let your quotes tell you why....

Kat;7686647 said:
BEAM;7686621 said:
Kat;7686606 said:
That man wouldn't have written that check so freely unless he knew he was getting a deal.

He's not a multi-billionaire by being generous.

He didn't become a multi-billionaire by being married to shorty either, so what's your point?

Now how the fuck you know that? I read that she was also an executive. Do you have some sort of proof as to what she has or has not contributed financially over the past 26 years?

One billion is nothing when you're worth TWENTY. It's the principle.

Kat;7686661 said:
Lol..nice deflection.

Good thing it is the law, cause men are just as fucking greedy.

I bet his ass was cheating.

So, it's cool to assume one thing, and not another? How the fuck do YOU know what went on in their marriage?

On what planet is $975 million not considered "fair", regardless of how much dude makes? Will she starve? Will the kids go hungry? Will her cat not be able to have steak tartare anymore?

Fuck...outta...here. 60% of the pro sports teams in America aren't worth that much, but you feminists are going to sit there and actually tell us her pussy and "wifely duties" are? She worth more than the Chicago Bears now? The OKC Thunder? The Kansas City Royals? No fucking way is this considered to be "logical"....zero.

See, it's selfish shit like this that makes me wish there was a HOH movement, cause I'd surely run for president of it.
 
Last edited:
My question to these females who are defending this greedy bitch what if it was the other way around. What if a dude married a billionaire for like 26 years and she cheated on him. Does the man deserve more of her money after a divorce?
 
Man she was married to that man for 26 years, give her her.

Men know the system by now. If you play the game dont complain about the rules .
 
Mister B.;7686896 said:
Your whole argument, @kat Stacks is bullshit, and I'll let your quotes tell you why....

Kat;7686647 said:
BEAM;7686621 said:
Kat;7686606 said:
That man wouldn't have written that check so freely unless he knew he was getting a deal.

He's not a multi-billionaire by being generous.

He didn't become a multi-billionaire by being married to shorty either, so what's your point?

Now how the fuck you know that? I read that she was also an executive. Do you have some sort of proof as to what she has or has not contributed financially over the past 26 years?

One billion is nothing when you're worth TWENTY. It's the principle.

Kat;7686661 said:
Lol..nice deflection.

Good thing it is the law, cause men are just as fucking greedy.

I bet his ass was cheating.

So, it's cool to assume one thing, and not another? How the fuck do YOU know what went on in their marriage?

On what planet is $975 million not considered "fair", regardless of how much dude makes? Will she starve? Will the kids go hungry? Will her cat not be able to have steak tartare anymore?

Fuck...outta...here. 60% of the pro sports teams in America aren't worth that much, but you feminists are going to sit there and actually tell us her pussy and "wifely duties" are? She worth more than the Chicago Bears now? The OKC Thunder? The Kansas City Royals? No fucking way is this considered to be "logical"....zero.

See, it's selfish shit like this that makes me wish there was a HOH movement, cause I'd surely run for president of it.

One of the greatest posts that I have ever read.

 
The dude married her knowing these rules were in place.

Hell he lost 20 mill on his wife before her!

This woman was with this man for 26 years, she was obviously worthwhile despite what yall think.

Shes entitled to half of whatever they made after the paperwork.

He knows it as well, which is why he is trying to lowball her.

If i know im entitled to half of 18 bill i damn sure aint walking away with 975 mill are yall serious?!
 
I understand she might be able to get more, but turning down $976 million?

That money is gonna last for 6 generations at least. And every descendant would be a millionaire. Shit ain't nothing to complain about.

Either she's really just that damn greedy or she put in work herself to feel that entitled to it. Or she could just be spiteful as well.
 
Last edited:
Both Arnall, who was formerly Sue Ann Hamm and resumed using her birth name after the divorce.. .

Hmmmm. Another point I'd like to bring up regarding divorce and monetary settlements involved from a layman's perspective

The modern woman loves the tag 'independence' (even whilst married) and would like to practice feminist ideals (anything a man can do, I can as well..)

So why do women who get divorced always want something (if anything) from the man? Is it not a weak desperate needy dependent attitude from women?

She has decided not to bear the man’s name anymore meaning she wants to remove any sort of connection between her and the man (after 26 years) so it was right of him to give her what he felt right and she was just being a greedy scheming bitch for rejecting it in my opinion.. .

Just late last year a dude in the UK killed himself after his ex-wife rejected a settlement he offered. Similar story to this one..

There's the law and there is principle
 
ShiveDreadz;7687309 said:
The dude married her knowing these rules were in place.

Hell he lost 20 mill on his wife before her!

This woman was with this man for 26 years, she was obviously worthwhile despite what yall think.

Shes entitled to half of whatever they made after the paperwork.

He knows it as well, which is why he is trying to lowball her.

If i know im entitled to half of 18 bill i damn sure aint walking away with 975 mill are yall serious?!

How is she entitled to half? Cuz the nigga fucked her a couple of times? Rich people dont do small shit like housework younknow cooking, cleaning shit like that. Most rich people have nannies so she didnt raise the kids by herself. What entitles her to half of that mans money. Its not like she worked for it. I know she had everything she desired to this point. How could being married to someone give you the right to take half of their money when you decide to leave?

 
Im convinced alot of women dont want enough to take care of themselves for the rest of their natural lives nor do they want half

most women now think they are entitled to 100% of what that man made while leaving him in the poor house
 
Copper;7687704 said:
Im convinced alot of women dont want enough to take care of themselves for the rest of their natural lives nor do they want half

most women now think they are entitled to 100% of what that man made while leaving him in the poor house

Bitches bruh
 


Scot Young, 52, once one of Britain's wealthiest men, suffered horrific injuries after plummeting four storeys from a window of his luxury central London penthouse on Monday night.

His death came a year after the end of a six-year High Court divorce battle with his ex-wife Michelle, 49, who won £20million but claimed he had a hidden £400million fortune in offshore accounts.

*Michelle Young, 49, won a £20million payout after a six-year courtroom fight, but declared the sum a ‘disgrace’*
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...s-window-luxury-central-London-penthouse.html
 

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
156
Views
88
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…