your flyness
New member
usmarin3;9145935 said:your flyness;9145924 said:usmarin3;9145920 said:your flyness;9145824 said:not_osirus_jenkins;9145813 said:I knew it. And he'll be a billionaire and stay on the payroll as a spokesman or a corporate position.
Tidal is losing money, they about to pay pennies on the dollar for it
Companies like Apple. Anheuser Busch,etc don't buy companies that's losing money. They buy companies that poses a threat to them.
No they buy companies for their assets, because they can easily pay off the liabilities
not_osirus_jenkins;9145813 said:I knew it. And he'll be a billionaire and stay on the payroll as a spokesman or a corporate position.
Tidal is losing money, they about to pay pennies on the dollar for it
How do you know their losing money when they're not a public company? Lawsuits don't mean shit when companies get sued everyday and most of those lawsuits are thrown out because they are frivolous.
They same way prospective buyers know. Unless you are accusing Apple of insider trading?
The Financial word is its losing money.
Even Spotify (the streaming service leader), Rhapsody ,and Apple themselves are losing money on their streaming service
Spotify, the 9-year-old market leader, is valued at $8 billion, and it loses money. Three-quarters of its more than 60 million members use its free, ad-supported service rather than paying $9.99 for a monthly subscription. Smaller players such as Deezer and Rhapsody also lose money but have managed to stay afloat. Apple is expected to introduce its own product using Beats technology later this month at the same $9.99 subscription price—but the $757 billion company can afford to break even or even lose money on music as long as it sells more iPhones, iPads, and watches.[/qoute]
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/featu...l-streaming-music-service-has-been-a-disaster
Last edited: