"Ain't no such thing as a bisexual."

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
PK_TK_187;4613758 said:
i see majority of the IC are still morons if they think guys cant be bi but chicks can

Ain't nothin' "bi"sexual about gettin' fucked in the ass... which you've admitted to. That shit is all gay.

 
I dont know why yall even entertain this clown LOL

By definition a man can be bisexual, but in reality he might as well just be gay because women arent going to accept him back like say, a man will accept a female that has been on the other side of the fence.

Was a thread a while back on this subject in the powder room, none of the females messing with a dude that liked dude booty at any point, thats just the way it is

 
This is what stupid niggers worry about, while their favorite rapper, actor, and church pastor fucks other men and live lives 10 times more useful to the world. Xanax tastes bitter no matter what you call it, labels are for idiots.

No homo.
 
1313214664227.jpg


 
yes, it do exist.

if a person fucks with BOTH sex= Bisexual

if a person fuck with the same sex ONLY = Homosexual

if a person fucks with the opposite sex ONLY= Heterosexual

it's indecisive to post, "bisexuality is only for women, but not for guys". because at the end of the day, Bisexuality is Bisexuality. and y'all support the entire act, by supporting an aspect of it.

that's why y'all claim, "it can't exist for men, but can for women". because deep down, u know by supporting women doing it, u supporting the men as well.

Also, some guys are unsure of themselves. They suppress "emotions". They tell themselves, "men can only be gay or straight, no in-between".

They use the fact they like women (as well), as validation that they're exclusively straight. So by admitting that men can be "bisexuals", they feel they're admitting that they are "in-between" as well.

 
Last edited:
@PK_TK_187

If you have had a cock 'n' balls in your mouth and had your shit pushed in you are a faggot. Period. And your girl is fucking nasty.
 
Michael_Malice;4616272 said:
The IC is turning into a rest haven for faggots.

It's not a rest haven it's more like the thunderdome. Faggots and dykes alike come through and try to beat and berate acceptance of their lifestyle and other fuckery. Keeps failing but they keep trying.
 
lol this is funny as hell.

I studied sex and psychology in college so let me school yall niggas.

Yes there are bisexuals for men and woman.

some str8 ppl may engage in sex acts with the same sex for reasons that have nothing to do with sex.

like the dopa-mine rush,or just to relieve stress, to be self destructive. These ppl in some cases are not considered gay or bisexual. They are usually put in the curious category or just str8.

just like a chick might be a hoe and fuck mad niggas just bcuz she has low self esteem

but she might not really be enjoying the sex. she is doing it for mental self validation.

Other ppl have high sex drives especially men,but they might not be able to procure

the sex they need from. woman,so they turn to men to temporarily relieve them until a woman is avaliable

this tends to happen in jail. even though they may not be attracted to the same sex.

also yall niggas saying thats not natural, do yall niggas know how the practice of oral

sex was started. it use to be something soldiers would make captured prisoners of wars

do to them male and female as form of torture and humilation,it had nothing to do with sex.

so yall niggas getting head from a bitch, need to remember that lol/

 
I don't judge anyone on who they fuck. It would behoove the rest of humanity to do the same. Strap up niggas, and you won't worry about 90% of the diseases out here, for #1.

But, it's against all logic to say girls can be bi and guys can't, just cause it doesn't "appeal" to you visually. Why the fuck to do you care, for #2.

And to say "it's not natural" and "you're cheating God/evolution/creation" is bullshit when you consider the whole concept of birth control, genetic creation, In vitro processes, surrogate parents (when dick + pussy isn't the REAL equation, but sperm + egg IS, you uniformed fucktards), and everything else for #3.

Y'all bang whomever you want. No one else should give a shit.
 
Last edited:
Truth Writer;4616606 said:
Why the fuck to do you care, for #2.

I pose the same question to you b/c you're caping mad hard right now.

Truth Writer;4616606 said:
And to say "it's not natural" and "you're cheating God/evolution/creation" is bullshit when you consider the whole concept of birth control, genetic creation, In vitro processes, surrogate parents (when dick + pussy isn't the REAL equation, but sperm + egg IS, you uniformed fucktards)

Fuck all the religion shit but what the hell don't y'all niggas understand about the fact that it doesn't change what the male & female sex organs are for?

Birth control, genetric creation, in vitro or w/e the fuck else are all unnatural as well genius.

When you are born & hit puberty, if both the female and male sex organs function "properly" or how they're "supposed" to then they will pro-create

You are correct that sperm + egg is the process but are you that dumb to ignore the fact that the male has the sperm and the female has the egg? And that any process used to get the two together other than female-male intercourse would be deemed "unnatural" b/c every other method involves some sort of scientific process?

I see reading comprehension is not everyone's strong suit.

Feel like I'm talking to Lakers fans right now.

 
We can go on and on about unnatural shit and the point of man & women must be together to make babies, but schooling you guys would be too easy. The "Top 10 Reasons to Ban Gay Marriage", already was some GOAT shit.
 
ho·mo·sex·u·al·i·ty   [hoh-muh-sek-shoo-al-i-tee, or, especially Brit., -seks-yoo-] Show IPA

noun

sexual desire or behavior directed toward a person or persons of one's own sex.

But there goes your definition of homosexuality. It doesn't say, "ONLY toward a person or persons of one's own sex."

So like I said in the first place... yes a man maybe bisexual but a bisexual male is still a homosexual.

All bisexuals are homosexuals but not all homosexuals are bisexual.

Ironically, it works the same way as squares and rectangles.
 
VIBE;4616705 said:
We can go on and on about unnatural shit and the point of man & women must be together to make babies, but schooling you guys would be too easy. The "Top 10 Reasons to Ban Gay Marriage", already was some GOAT shit.

No it wasn't GOAT anything. That list only applied to Gay Marriage for the most part. Nobody discussing that right now nor do I think anyone cares. Let gays marry if they want.

 
politicalthug202;4616428 said:
lol this is funny as hell.

I studied sex and psychology in college so let me school yall niggas.

Yes there are bisexuals for men and woman.

some str8 ppl may engage in sex acts with the same sex for reasons that have nothing to do with sex.

like the dopa-mine rush,or just to relieve stress, to be self destructive. These ppl in some cases are not considered gay or bisexual. They are usually put in the curious category or just str8.

just like a chick might be a hoe and fuck mad niggas just bcuz she has low self esteem

but she might not really be enjoying the sex. she is doing it for mental self validation.

Other ppl have high sex drives especially men,but they might not be able to procure

the sex they need from. woman,so they turn to men to temporarily relieve them until a woman is avaliable

this tends to happen in jail. even though they may not be attracted to the same sex.

also yall niggas saying thats not natural, do yall niggas know how the practice of oral

sex was started. it use to be something soldiers would make captured prisoners of wars

do to them male and female as form of torture and humilation,it had nothing to do with sex.

so yall niggas getting head from a bitch, need to remember that lol/

i stopped reading after that dumb ass line

index.php


nigga u better off droppin' out , niggaz out there, capturing and hiring crack heads as professors.
 
Last edited:
(ob)Scene;4616686 said:
Truth Writer;4616606 said:
Why the fuck to do you care, for #2.

I pose the same question to you b/c you're caping mad hard right now.

Why does it have to be caping just cause I offer a difference of opinion? You that close-minded? Or do you think you IC jargon is that funny. Cause you're wrong on both levels.

And to answer your question (since you couldn't really answer mine) I really don't care who bangs who, but I DO have issue with people who try to push ANY agenda on anyone else that imposes the concept of "free will."


(ob)Scene;4616686 said:
Truth Writer;4616606 said:
And to say "it's not natural" and "you're cheating God/evolution/creation" is bullshit when you consider the whole concept of birth control, genetic creation, In vitro processes, surrogate parents (when dick + pussy isn't the REAL equation, but sperm + egg IS, you uniformed fucktards)

Fuck all the religion shit but what the hell don't y'all niggas understand about the fact that it doesn't change what the male & female sex organs are for?

Birth control, genetric creation, in vitro or w/e the fuck else are all unnatural as well genius.

When you are born & hit puberty, if both the female and male sex organs function "properly" or how they're "supposed" to then they will pro-create

You are correct that sperm + egg is the process but are you that dumb to ignore the fact that the male has the sperm and the female has the egg? And that any process used to get the two together other than female-male intercourse would be deemed "unnatural" b/c every other method involves some sort of scientific process?

I see reading comprehension is not everyone's strong suit.

Feel like I'm talking to Lakers fans right now.

Oops. I'm sorry. I guess I must've forgot to mention sperm banks and fertility clinics where dick doesn't have to go near pussy for sperm to reach egg....ya know, the other "natural" way life is created.

Silly me.

BTW: I hate the fuckin' Lakers, cocktard.
 
Last edited:
Truth Writer;4617411 said:
Why does it have to be caping just cause I offer a difference of opinion? You that close-minded? Or do you think you IC jargon is that funny. Cause you're wrong on both levels.

And to answer your question (since you couldn't really answer mine) I really don't care who bangs who, but I DO have issue with people who try to push ANY agenda on anyone else that imposes the concept of "free will."

You're not caping b/c you have a difference in opinion, intelligent one (I already said IDC what homos do; I'm just not a protector of the shit as you & others are). You're caping b/c your mad emotional in your defense; reducing yourself to name calling and other emotion fueled defenses against those that do not agree w/ the promotion of homosexuality. If you read my first few posts in this thread (reading comprehension again) you would know that I'm not in support of gay bashing--meaning there is no agenda I am pushing, just in here voicing MY opinion of the matter.

However, your ignorance leaves you utterly blind to the fact that you're a hypocrite saying, you "have issue w/ people who try to push ANY agenda on anyone else that imposes the concept of 'free will.'" B/c you're not just going at gay bashers, right now you're going against anyone that doesn't like or condone homosexuality... basically pushing the gay agenda onto those who don't agree w/ you.

The same way homosexuals have every right to be together others have every right to believe that shit is unnatural and nasty. The problem arises when people try to impose their beliefs onto gays (ie. not allowing gay marriage, etc.) which I believe is immoral in every way b/c they are still humans.

Truth Writer;4617411 said:
Oops. I'm sorry. I guess I must've forgot to mention sperm banks and fertility clinics where dick doesn't have to go near pussy for sperm to reach egg....ya know, the other "natural" way life is created.

Silly me.


Fam c'mon. I just addressed this shit like 4 times already (plus once more in reply to you directly [reading comprehension smh]). There is nothing "natural" about what goes on in sperm banks & fertility clinics. That is a scientific/medical process. There's nothing "natural" about impregnating someone via tubes, needles, etc.

Even if it's a male and female that go through the process it doesn't change the fact that THE PURPOSE of a males piece is to provide the female box--whose PURPOSE is to provide the egg--w/ sperm so that a male and female can procreate. Whether their sex organs function properly or not is irrelevant.

I gave you all the "for dummies" version earlier in the thread but it seems you guys aren't even smart enough to comprehend that.

If a phone charger has a short in it and you have to resort to using a battery case to charge your phone, it DOES NOT change the fact that the phone charger was MADE to charge phones.

Male sperm + male sperm =/= child. Female egg + female egg =/= child. Male sperm + female egg = child.

Which is the only point I've been trying to make in this thread.
 
Last edited:

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
123
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…