Africans genetically closer to Chimpanzees

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Considering no one read the cited info from the first post (that includes me) I guess this whole "God made me first!" response isn't surprising.
 
Last edited:
Chike;1669889 said:
No it doesn't, because africans did not evolve from chimpanzees. I thought you knew all about evolution, bro... smh

And Europeans did not evolve from Neanderthals.

Have you paid no attention to detail?

The information you black racists were celebrating was that about four percent of Europeans appear to share DNA with the extinct Neanderthal, which was basically a human with extra hair and a larger brain.

This study here shows that blacks TODAY share more genetic connections with simple chimpanzees than anyone else.
 
Last edited:
KTULU IS BACK;1669911 said:
And Europeans did not evolve from Neanderthals.

Have you paid no attention to detail?

The information you black racists were celebrating was that about four percent of Europeans appear to share DNA with the extinct Neanderthal, which was basically a human with extra hair and a larger brain.

This study here shows that blacks TODAY share more genetic connections with simple chimpanzees than anyone else.

...but Caucasians are recessive ascendants of Africans.... All the genes save the neanderthal gene in Caucasians are found in Africans.... therefore, Caucasians are a recessive version of the people that are closest to chimps.... You're basically making things look worse for Caucasians lol
 
Last edited:
1. Ascendants? Are you drunker than I am?

2. Again, Neandtherthals are not sub-Human. They appear to have had all the same qualities as Homo Sapiens, but with BIGGER BRAINS and more hair. A little funny looking, but just as intelligent, if not moreso.

3. Genetic recessiveness does not mean what you seem to think it means. Recessive means less likely, not inferior. A less likely gene can survive just as well, if not better, than a probable gene.

4. TODAY... I repeat... TODAY IN THIS TIME.... Africans are proven to be closer to chimps than Europeans, Asians, Samoans, Native Americans, etc.

We're not talking about pre-history. We're talking about now. Now, Africans are more chimp-like than the white man.

And it's been proven.
 
Last edited:
KTULU IS BACK;1669952 said:
1. Ascendants? Are you drunker than I am?

2. Again, Neandtherthals are not sub-Human. They appear to have had all the same qualities as Homo Sapiens, but with BIGGER BRAINS and more hair. A little funny looking, but just as intelligent, if not moreso.

3. Genetic recessiveness does not mean what you seem to think it means. Recessive means less likely, not inferior. A less likely gene can survive just as well, if not better, than a probable gene.

4. TODAY... I repeat... TODAY IN THIS TIME.... Africans are proven to be closer to chimps than Europeans, Asians, Samoans, Native Americans, etc.

We're not talking about pre-history. We're talking about now. Now, Africans are more chimp-like than the white man.

And it's been proven.

It still makes no sense... You arguement.... Chimps and Humans have a common ancestor. Same with Neanderthals. Neanderthals however were not smarter than Homosapiens.... They became extinct because of it. Caucasians on the other hand, are homosapiens as well..... If they have Neanderthal genes it's because Homosapiens and Neanderthals in the past had interbred some how. The connection between Caucasian and Neanderthal is nothing like this genetic similarity between Human and Chimp. You're just fabricating your own bullshit because you're catching feelings.

In the end... again I say... So what? What is the point of this thread? Trolling? Yes, I think so.
 
Last edited:
heyslick;1670219 said:
Neanderthals are the most recent, extinct relatives of modern humans. The current fossil records suggest they diverged from the primate line that led to the Homo sapiens some 400,000 years ago in Africa. Neanderthals then migrated north into Eurasia, where they became a geographically isolated group, evolving independent of the line that led to modern humans in Africa. They lived in Europe and western Asia, and Neanderthal remains have been found as far east as southern Siberia and as far south as the Middle East. Until 370,000 years later – about 30,000 years or approximately 1500 generations ago – they disappeared.

Right...

_______________________
 
Last edited:
KTULU IS BACK;1668592 said:
1. god doesn't exist

2. evolving is not a win. it's just not being dead.

3. genetically, Africans are closer to chimpanzees than any other race of people today. This is certainly not a Win.

Its interesting that the Caucasian is the one race on the planet to revert back to a state close to our original state. I'm speaking in terms of savagery and surviving off of instinct that is...The caves of Europe had to have been brutal during primitive times, and its shows in the behavior of those that have origins from the regions even still today.
 
Last edited:
heyslick;1670273 said:
HOWEVER.....SO who's so smart now?

Some 400,000 years ago, Neanderthals diverged from the primate line that led to present-day humans. The Homo neanderthalis died out 30,000 years ago, while we managed to evolve into the handsomely built, technically skilled, and somewhat reasonable animal we are today. Research into Neanderthal DNA now shows that our extinct relatives did leave their mark in the genomes of some modern humans, leading researchers to believe that our species 'paired up' with our less evolutionary successful cousins when we were both living in the Middle East, about 100,000 to 50,000 years ago and before we left to populate Europe and Asia.

I don't get what you're trying to say. Are you disagreeing with me or agreeing? XD
 
Last edited:
really folks??? we are arguing that the colour of ones skin is directly resposnsible on our ability to gain wisdom and knowledge??? in today's day and age? with a black man as the leader of the most powerful country in the world...go figure
 
Last edited:
heyslick;1672149 said:
Research into Neanderthal DNA now shows that our extinct relatives did leave their mark in the genomes of some modern humans, leading researchers to believe that our species 'paired up' with our less evolutionary successful cousins when we were both living in the Middle East, about 100,000 to 50,000 years ago and before we left to populate Europe and Asia. I'm just countering your senseless rhetoric about who iEvolved from who & who the superior human being might be & My sources are disagreeing ---- Just like in another goofy thread of yours about Healthy people shouldn't be getting cancer & DNA is always changing.....Bs and my reply to your nonsense was avoided by mister don't he thinks he knows it all....& don't dispute him..... well FU punk!


Wait... what? lol You're rambling. Why you catching feelings? What part of what I said are you disagreeing with? And type clearly please, because you're not making any sense.
 
Last edited:
Chike;1672416 said:
Wait... what? lol You're rambling. Why you catching feelings? What part of what I said are you disagreeing with? And type clearly please, because you're not making any sense.

He does this often... Lol
 
Last edited:
"24And God said, Let the earth bring forth the living creature after his kind, cattle, and creeping thing, and beast of the earth after his kind: and it was so. 25And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth after his kind: and God saw that it was good." Genesis 1:24-25

I put the most importand parts of the verse in red. God delivers that eternal ether. I love you Lord!
 
Last edited:

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
34
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…