Adolf Trump's Transition Team Confirms Pick of Racist Senator Jeff Sessions for AG Nomination...

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
a.mann;9503019 said:
ghostdog56;9502996 said:
Where are all you niggas that were screaming Obama is the president of all america for the last eight years? Trump is pushing a white agenda with zero fucks given but Obama couldn't push a black one? Y'all are getting your nigga wake up call, it seems like only black people push this we all in this together shit.

So don't cry now you had eight years to get him to pass bills that would benefit black people but as usual you went right to the back of the bus and let "all of America" (which apparently doesn't include black people) get the good seats

So you disagree with black people that say Trump getting elected is ""the best thing that could happened" for the black community??

No presidential candidate has ever been good for black people but since trump is incapable of hiding his racism a lot of black people are finally starting to see this country for what it really is instead of being fooled by Hillary with her undercover racism into believing that we are actually apart of something
 
Olorun22;9502829 said:
We going to Africa or Nah?
nah

Malcolmxm1carbine3gr.gif
 
Amerikkka is getting what she deserves. And yet us negroes are still doing what we do best infighting and blaming. We did our part it was a smaller part than last time but we did our part. The reason Trump and his goons are in office is because the others that did or did not vote. Stop blaming our people
 
Last edited:
It's funny. Calling out these anti-black bigots and racists for what they are is going to get you labeled as 'unAmerican', 'anti-American', 'unpatriotic' and a communist or a socialist.
 
stringer bell;9502935 said:
https://twitter.com/aclu/status/799651039733485568

Smh...

"None of this affects black people."

"Also ... if you are a human being that is not a black male - your civil rights and existence do not matter"

 
Last edited:
Peace_79;9503094 said:
stringer bell;9502935 said:
https://twitter.com/aclu/status/799651039733485568

Smh...

"None of this affects black people."

"Also ... if you are a human being that is not a black male - your civil rights and existence do not matter"

Who said this shit?
 
Olorun22;9502829 said:
We going to Africa or Nah?

Dont know. There are options. When you have such a large portion of the Country that seemed unable to recognize a potential disaster and even more unwilling to do anything to avert it, it makes you wonder. Like uh, who am I living among here? If you smart enough to know better and act/acted accordingly. Just things to think about. Who knows cant say right now.
 
Last edited:
Go figure;9503224 said:
Swiffness!;9502919 said:
But but Hillary said superpredators

I mean if u just wanna bring up a single word yet ignore a whole bill and what it did then thats on u

What bill? If its the crime bill I only have limited interest in a get tough on crime bill 20 years ago during a different, crime ridden era. Criminals arent heroes that should have been coddled and allowed to victimize neighborhoods such as mine. Not that it didnt have bad effects too. Thats life you weigh everything and surmise who would be the best choice...going forward. In 2016 (different era) its not 1994 anymore. I think its more important to look forward. I wouldnt have seen anything like that happening during a Hillary presidency in 2016 (different era/dynamics). But now who knows? This is just my opinion. No candidate is going to align with you on everything. Thats where the weighing and deducing the best option going forward comes in.
 
Last edited:
NoCompetition;9503255 said:
Go figure;9503224 said:
Swiffness!;9502919 said:
But but Hillary said superpredators

I mean if u just wanna bring up a single word yet ignore a whole bill and what it did then thats on u

What bill? If its the crime bill I only have limited interest in a get tough on crime bill 20 years ago during a different, crime ridden era. Criminals arent heroes that should have been coddled and allowed to victimize neighborhoods such as mine. Not that it didnt have bad effects too. Thats life you weigh everything and surmise who would be the best choice...going forward. In 2016 (different era) its not 1994 anymore. I think its more important to look forward. I wouldnt have seen anything like that happening during a Hillary presidency in 2016 (different era/dynamics). But now who knows? This is just my opinion. No candidate is going to align with you on everything. Thats where the weighing and deducing the best option going forward comes in.

not talking about coddling anybody. the prison system is flawed, people got life sentences for non violent offenses and guess what group has suffered the most?

These days, Jeremy Travis is president of the John Jay College of Criminal Justice. But 20 years ago, he attended the signing ceremony for the crime bill — and joined the Clinton Justice Department.

"Here's the federal government coming in and saying we'll give you money if you punish people more severely, and 28 states and the District of Columbia followed the money and enacted stricter sentencing laws for violent offenses," Travis says.

But as Travis now knows all too well, there's a problem with that idea. Researchers including a National Academy of Sciences panel he led have since found only a modest relationship between incarceration and lower crime rates.

"We now know with the fullness of time that we made some terrible mistakes," Travis said. "And those mistakes were to ramp up the use of prison. And that big mistake is the one that we now, 20 years later, come to grips with. We have to look in the mirror and say, 'look what we have done.'"

Nick Turner of Vera put the human costs even more starkly.

"If you're a black baby born today, you have a 1 in 3 chance of spending some time in prison or jail," Turner said. "If you're Latino, it's a 1 in 6 chance. And if you're white, it's 1 in 17. And so coming to terms with these disparities and reversing them, I would argue, is not only a matter of fairness and justice but it's, I would argue, a matter of national security."

the fact that this bill was passed 20 years ago and STILL has a huge effect on problems in the black communities today u dont realize how bad an idea it was. Hillary had to renounce it during her campaign, joe biden is the one who drafted it...but he woudnt renounce it.
 
mass incarceration is one of the biggest contributing factors to black disenfranchisement today idk how someone can brush that off so easily
 
Go figure;9503276 said:
NoCompetition;9503255 said:
Go figure;9503224 said:
Swiffness!;9502919 said:
But but Hillary said superpredators

I mean if u just wanna bring up a single word yet ignore a whole bill and what it did then thats on u

What bill? If its the crime bill I only have limited interest in a get tough on crime bill 20 years ago during a different, crime ridden era. Criminals arent heroes that should have been coddled and allowed to victimize neighborhoods such as mine. Not that it didnt have bad effects too. Thats life you weigh everything and surmise who would be the best choice...going forward. In 2016 (different era) its not 1994 anymore. I think its more important to look forward. I wouldnt have seen anything like that happening during a Hillary presidency in 2016 (different era/dynamics). But now who knows? This is just my opinion. No candidate is going to align with you on everything. Thats where the weighing and deducing the best option going forward comes in.

not talking about coddling anybody. the prison system is flawed, people got life sentences for non violent offenses and guess what group has suffered the most?

These days, Jeremy Travis is president of the John Jay College of Criminal Justice. But 20 years ago, he attended the signing ceremony for the crime bill — and joined the Clinton Justice Department.

"Here's the federal government coming in and saying we'll give you money if you punish people more severely, and 28 states and the District of Columbia followed the money and enacted stricter sentencing laws for violent offenses," Travis says.

But as Travis now knows all too well, there's a problem with that idea. Researchers including a National Academy of Sciences panel he led have since found only a modest relationship between incarceration and lower crime rates.

"We now know with the fullness of time that we made some terrible mistakes," Travis said. "And those mistakes were to ramp up the use of prison. And that big mistake is the one that we now, 20 years later, come to grips with. We have to look in the mirror and say, 'look what we have done.'"

Nick Turner of Vera put the human costs even more starkly.

"If you're a black baby born today, you have a 1 in 3 chance of spending some time in prison or jail," Turner said. "If you're Latino, it's a 1 in 6 chance. And if you're white, it's 1 in 17. And so coming to terms with these disparities and reversing them, I would argue, is not only a matter of fairness and justice but it's, I would argue, a matter of national security."

the fact that this bill was passed 20 years ago and STILL has a huge effect on problems in the black communities today u dont realize how bad an idea it was. Hillary had to renounce it during her campaign, joe biden is the one who drafted it...but he woudnt renounce it.

That first bold says for violent offenses. Regardless Hillary didnt just lock up a bunch of innocent people doing nothing. Lets be honest we're talking criminals for the vast majority doing all kinds of foul things. There is accountability on them.The penalties were increased. Speaking of effects that linger today, crime is at historic lows, minorities are in college at historic levels. Under which Presidential candidate would these trends likely continue?There are alot of people who would be up to no good, recruiting and spreading crime who are unable too. This is my point about weighing things and figuring who would be better going forward.

But thats kind of my point about who are my fellow citizens? At some point people are what they are and its on me to navigate accordingly.
 
Last edited:
Go figure;9503224 said:
Swiffness!;9502919 said:
But but Hillary said superpredators

I mean if u just wanna bring up a single word yet ignore a whole bill and what it did then thats on u

I mean if you just want to ignore historical context and the 235 indivuals of Congress WHO ACTUALLY VOTED for the Bill (including Bernie Sanders and the majority of the Black Caucus), than that's on you ...
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/103-1994/h416
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ar...inton_sanders_for_1994_crime_bill_129729.html

"... Context matters, as do details. The story of the 1994 crime bill and its impacts cannot be easily summed up in a few sentences.

There was a lot of crime back then. More than double the current rate. There was a legitimate public demand for action..."


It's easy to use omniceint hindsight while singling out ONE person for one of the most destructive pieces of legislation of our generation.

But if you think about it .. it doesent make a lot of sense to do so.

The 1994 Crime Bill was not this evil plan designed, development and implemented solely by Hilary Clinton to reign untold destruction on the black community.

Cmon, bruh.

That old pasty bitch is not an All Powerful Super Villan

bj13wzr0v5cy.jpg


She's a politician...

Her past is only important in so much as it influences her future policy positions and legislation.

In this case, her role in supporting the Crime Bill has, in part, caused her to take a much more liberal stance on the criminal justice system and the injustice minorities face.

I don't care why.

I don't care about her as a person.

I only care about how I can use her to affect change.

But I'm pretty sure you still have no idea what she was proposing to do.

You're still stuck in the past.

 
Last edited:
Peace_79;9503310 said:
Go figure;9503224 said:
Swiffness!;9502919 said:
But but Hillary said superpredators

I mean if u just wanna bring up a single word yet ignore a whole bill and what it did then thats on u

I mean if you just want to ignore historical context and the 235 indivuals of Congress WHO ACTUALLY VOTED for the Bill (including Bernie Sanders and the majority of the Black Caucus), than that's on you ...
https://www.govtrack.us/congress/votes/103-1994/h416
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ar...inton_sanders_for_1994_crime_bill_129729.html

It's easy to use omniceint hindsight while singling out ONE person for one of the most destructive pieces of legislation of our generation.

But if you think about it .. it doesent make a lot of sense to do so.

The 1994 Crime Bill was not this evil plan designed, development and implemented solely by Hilary Clinton to reign untold destruction on the black community.

Cmon, bruh.

That old pasty bitch is not an All Powerful Super Villan

bj13wzr0v5cy.jpg

Not blaming hillary solely. It was a bipartisan bill. My issue with her is not this bill alone. The point of my comment was to not just highlight "super predator" and ignore the context of it. Thats all.

bitch is still evil tho
 
Last edited:

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
126
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…