A Miami woman killed a teen burglar as he fled her home, police say. Should she be charged?

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
mryounggun;8841706 said:
D. Morgan;8841683 said:
mryounggun;8841675 said:
D. Morgan;8841616 said:
mryounggun;8841595 said:
D. Morgan;8841588 said:
mryounggun;8841568 said:
D. Morgan;8841555 said:
mryounggun;8841544 said:
D. Morgan;8841541 said:
mryounggun;8841439 said:
D. Morgan;8841335 said:
mryounggun;8841319 said:
Lock her ass up. If he was fleeing like the report says, then there was no imminent threat to her life.

Fuck her.

You sure, cause it also says they had a brief confrontation and he got shot in the chest not the back.

'You sure?'. Lol. No I ain't sure, nigga. I'm going on what the article says. Like I said, IF HE WAS SHOT WHILE FLEEING like the article says...lock her up.

Quite sure!! Cause the article said they had a brief confrontation and he got shot in the chest.

Not sure how that means he wasn't fleeing. But sure.

So when fleeing folks run towards the person they are fleeing from. Good to know so I can keep that in mind now.

Who said he was running towards her? It says he was going out the back door when she say him. Sounds like he was leaving, she saw him and pulled out. He turned and they exchanged words and then she shot him.

I wasn't there so I dunno. All I have to go on is the article.

They have a brief confrontation and he gets shot in the chest but he's supposed to be fleeing. How did he get shot in the chest if not fleeing past her?

I feel like I just explained that pretty clearly. Lol. I dunno how to make it clearer, without being able to draw you a diagram.

You didn't explain shit you told what you imagined happened. Your imagination don't make shit clear.

And you told what YOU imagined happened. Lol. Like him not being shot while fleeing. *shrugs*

Put it this way there are two different scenarios of what happened in the article.

One says they had a brief confrontation and he was shot in the chest. I believe this one

The other says he was fleeing and still shot in the chest. You believe this one

End of story!

And my point is that both can be true. But agreed...end of story!

Peace.

Damn wasted key strokes cause I never caught on to the bold LLS!!
 
IMO. He got shot because he was in someone's home, not because of burglary.

I've said this in another thread... If I break into someone's home, I have given up my right to life.
 
Paprika;8841667 said:
The_Jackal;8841608 said:
It's almost disgusting how little people value property and how much people value life. Regardless he was on here property when this occurred and the fact is he was shot in the chest. If he was fleeing he did a very poor job at that. Uncountable he was killed but there are consequences for your action and sometimes they are permanent. His family has no one to blame but themselves

When it comes to law, possession and property is something you don't mess with.

With that said, she didn't have the right to shoot if she wasn't inside the house.

Some of you guys are taking this quite personal. Interpreting it as if you were in the house. No one was home. She decided to be a vigilante and should face the consequences of her actions as he faced his.


BUt the report clearly states she was in her house.

As for the bolded It is a personal event for her. Your home is your shelter and your lifeline. She was justified in killing him.

 
Did he "DESERVE" to die? No he didn't.

Is getting shot while committing that type of crime a good possibility? Yes it is.

I have no sympathy for the lil dude and I hope this lady walks off free of any charges and nothing happens to her by his family, loved ones or friends.
 
Just read this a few hours ago.

Im torn on one hand it was unnecessary.

On the other hand you reap what you sow.

Also what if she was home what would he have done... would it have been more than a burglary/attempt What ifs dont happen but it is important to think of the potential.

I mean his fam is out there sayin he was this and that.. that nigga was in someone elses crib. i think she should be charged with something
 
The_Jackal;8841725 said:
Paprika;8841667 said:
The_Jackal;8841608 said:
It's almost disgusting how little people value property and how much people value life. Regardless he was on here property when this occurred and the fact is he was shot in the chest. If he was fleeing he did a very poor job at that. Uncountable he was killed but there are consequences for your action and sometimes they are permanent. His family has no one to blame but themselves

When it comes to law, possession and property is something you don't mess with.

With that said, she didn't have the right to shoot if she wasn't inside the house.

Some of you guys are taking this quite personal. Interpreting it as if you were in the house. No one was home. She decided to be a vigilante and should face the consequences of her actions as he faced his.


BUt the report clearly states she was in her house.

As for the bolded It is a personal event for her. Your home is your shelter and your lifeline. She was justified in killing him.

naw man she wasnt at home. her security alarm went off. THEN she came back home. article says its not sure if she called the police or the security company did. But once the kid broke into her home, she was not there. but did make it back home before the kid got away.
 
texas409;8841684 said:
Shizlansky;8841320 said:
This quote right here pissed me the fuck off.

“You have to look at it from every child’s point of view that was raised in the hood,” Harris said. “You have to understand… how he gonna get his money to have clothes to go to school? You have to look at it from his point-of-view.”

another reason why black women are dooming us

Faggot
 
Paprika;8841667 said:
The_Jackal;8841608 said:
It's almost disgusting how little people value property and how much people value life. Regardless he was on here property when this occurred and the fact is he was shot in the chest. If he was fleeing he did a very poor job at that. Uncountable he was killed but there are consequences for your action and sometimes they are permanent. His family has no one to blame but themselves

When it comes to law, possession and property is something you don't mess with.

With that said, she didn't have the right to shoot if she wasn't inside the house.

Some of you guys are taking this quite personal. Interpreting it as if you were in the house. No one was home. She decided to be a vigilante and should face the consequences of her actions as he faced his.

She caught the nigga in her house. So how did she become a "vigilante"

How sway

Did she catch up around the corner? Did she hunt him down days after?

Or

Did she catch the nigga in her shit?
 
playmaker88;8841739 said:
Just read this a few hours ago.

Im torn on one hand it was unnecessary.

On the other hand you reap what you sow.

Also what if she was home what would he have done... would it have been more than a burglary/attempt What ifs dont happen but it is important to think of the potential.

I mean his fam is out there sayin he was this and that.. that nigga was in someone elses crib. i think she should be charged with something

im on the same boat as you and agree with everything u posted but stil unsure about the bolded.. like i said earlier in the tread this aint so black and white...
 
The_Jackal;8841725 said:
Paprika;8841667 said:
The_Jackal;8841608 said:
It's almost disgusting how little people value property and how much people value life. Regardless he was on here property when this occurred and the fact is he was shot in the chest. If he was fleeing he did a very poor job at that. Uncountable he was killed but there are consequences for your action and sometimes they are permanent. His family has no one to blame but themselves

When it comes to law, possession and property is something you don't mess with.

With that said, she didn't have the right to shoot if she wasn't inside the house.

Some of you guys are taking this quite personal. Interpreting it as if you were in the house. No one was home. She decided to be a vigilante and should face the consequences of her actions as he faced his.


BUt the report clearly states she was in her house.

As for the bolded It is a personal event for her. Your home is your shelter and your lifeline. She was justified in killing him.

This is what the report says:

She can also be forgiven for racing home when, on Thursday afternoon, her security system alerted her to another break-in at the property.

“The police told her don’t go in the house,”

Instead she went to

"inspect the exterior of the home"

"Went room to room"

"She observed a subject exiting the home through the rear,”

Then she took matters into her own hands and shot him. She went searching for trouble and found it. Key points, she wasn't home, he was unarmed,she went inside the home, she went straight for her gun, he ran, he died.

I hope she finds solace in her new home serving 8-10 years.
 
Paprika;8841773 said:
The_Jackal;8841725 said:
Paprika;8841667 said:
The_Jackal;8841608 said:
It's almost disgusting how little people value property and how much people value life. Regardless he was on here property when this occurred and the fact is he was shot in the chest. If he was fleeing he did a very poor job at that. Uncountable he was killed but there are consequences for your action and sometimes they are permanent. His family has no one to blame but themselves

When it comes to law, possession and property is something you don't mess with.

With that said, she didn't have the right to shoot if she wasn't inside the house.

Some of you guys are taking this quite personal. Interpreting it as if you were in the house. No one was home. She decided to be a vigilante and should face the consequences of her actions as he faced his.


BUt the report clearly states she was in her house.

As for the bolded It is a personal event for her. Your home is your shelter and your lifeline. She was justified in killing him.

This is what the report says:

She can also be forgiven for racing home when, on Thursday afternoon, her security system alerted her to another break-in at the property.

“The police told her don’t go in the house,”

Instead she went to

"inspect the exterior of the home"

"Went room to room"

"She observed a subject exiting the home through the rear,”

Then she took matters into her own hands and shot him. She went searching for trouble and found it. Key points, she wasn't home, he was unarmed,she went inside the home, she went straight for her gun, he ran, he died.

I hope she finds solace in her new home serving 8-10 years.

She went looking for trouble?

That her place. He went lookin for trouble.

Some of y'all sound like some stay with your moms, and don't own a car ass niggas.

My alarm goes off I'm going home and secure my shit. Fuck waiting for the police. I'm the king of this castle and will defend it with my life.

Just because the most valuable thing y'all own is a PS4 don't mean I ain't gon protect mine.
 
Paprika;8841773 said:
The_Jackal;8841725 said:
Paprika;8841667 said:
The_Jackal;8841608 said:
It's almost disgusting how little people value property and how much people value life. Regardless he was on here property when this occurred and the fact is he was shot in the chest. If he was fleeing he did a very poor job at that. Uncountable he was killed but there are consequences for your action and sometimes they are permanent. His family has no one to blame but themselves

When it comes to law, possession and property is something you don't mess with.

With that said, she didn't have the right to shoot if she wasn't inside the house.

Some of you guys are taking this quite personal. Interpreting it as if you were in the house. No one was home. She decided to be a vigilante and should face the consequences of her actions as he faced his.


BUt the report clearly states she was in her house.

As for the bolded It is a personal event for her. Your home is your shelter and your lifeline. She was justified in killing him.

This is what the report says:

She can also be forgiven for racing home when, on Thursday afternoon, her security system alerted her to another break-in at the property.

“The police told her don’t go in the house,”

Instead she went to

"inspect the exterior of the home"

"Went room to room"

"She observed a subject exiting the home through the rear,”

Then she took matters into her own hands and shot him. She went searching for trouble and found it. Key points, she wasn't home, he was unarmed,she went inside the home, she went straight for her gun, he ran, he died.

I hope she finds solace in her new home serving 8-10 years.

We thought the same shit with Zimmerman. Will be interesting how Florida's Stand your Ground/Self-defense laws.
 
The audacity of someone breaking into your property and taking your belongings can enrage the calmest person.

While I think I wouldn't shoot someone in the back and I can understand the argument against it.....

What if you got babies in the house?

What if its just another break in , in a series of break ins and he's getting bolder.

I don't condone.... But I understand.

And if you a crook every house you break into ain't gonna be some timid person hiding in the corner... You run the risk of pissing someone off.
 
Article can be confusing cuz it says he was fleeing but was shot in the chest

so was he backpedaling?

none the less, imo it's justified... you break into someone's home that's the risk you take

if he was unarmed how would she kno?

if you break into my shit Ima assume you armed & shoot 1st, then sort the rest later
 
Brian B.;8841827 said:
Article can be confusing cuz it says he was fleeing but was shot in the chest

so was he backpedaling?

none the less, imo it's justified... you break into someone's home that's the risk you take

if he was unarmed how would she kno?

if you break into my shit Ima assume you armed & shoot 1st, then sort the rest later

LOL @ backpedaling
 
@Lemonpepper&paprika is tripping hard as fuck yo

I don't think anyone is seriously celebrating the death of that young man but it's very hard to be as compassionate about this as some of the other Stand Your Ground cases that have rolled thru the IC

I don't care that she went home after her alarm went off, that's what she was supposed to do.

I don't care he didn't walk out with anything, I think her presence there prevented that. Let's not act like he took a quick tour of the place cause he was interested in the decor and was going to go about his merry way.

He was about that life and the game caught up to him. Sucks it happened so early in his life and with such final consequences but it is what it is.
 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
284
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…