A big-bang theory gets a big boost: Evidence that vast cosmos was created in split second

[Bodhi]

@Bodhi it's not worth being polemic or recriminating, skillful means pleighboi.

True

you got dharma fucked up B.

me?

 

[bambu]

@Bodhi it's not worth being polemic or recriminating, skillful means pleighboi.

I wish all of you the best aside from Bambu, you got dharma fucked up B.

Nigga please.......

I never even had a dialogue with your pie ass.........

The God does not need or desire your well wishes.............

You mad cause Buddha shot fire and water outta his ass at the same damn time????

 

[zombie]

Isn't believing in God central to the faith? Yes, it is. If believing in god is irrational, the faith itself is also irrational.

The central claim in Buddhist thought is dependent arising which is objective truth. The eightfold path is the way to conduct yourself based off the central idea.

believing in god is not irrational, in fact it's logical and like i keep saying the faith in itself is not irrational, proving god exists is saying that you know god to be objectively real which is irrational because you cannot prove his existence or non-existence.

restate the bolded

 

[Bodhi]

I said believing in god is irrational

believing in god is not irrational

???

 

[zombie]

I said believing in god is irrational

believing in god is not irrational

???

Stop cutting my statements in half to prove your point that's bitchassness

 

[(Nope)]

@Bodhi it's not worth being polemic or recriminating, skillful means pleighboi.

True

you got dharma fucked up B.

me?

Bambu

 

[bambu]

Some species are not related and cannot be properly placed in a vertical or tree diagram.......

The consensus says it demands a re-examination of the theory..........

False.

"The tree of life is being politely buried," said Michael Rose, an evolutionary biologist at the University of California, Irvine. "What's less accepted is that our whole fundamental view of biology needs to change."

Many biologists now argue that the tree concept is obsolete and needs to be discarded. "We have no

evidence at all that the tree of life is a reality," says Bapteste. That bombshell has even persuaded some that our fundamental view of biology needs to change."
http://postbiota.org/pipermail/tt/2009-February/004416.html

Consensus = a general agreement about something

 

[bambu]

@Bodhi it's not worth being polemic or recriminating, skillful means pleighboi.

True

you got dharma fucked up B.

me?

Bambu

Keep my name off your keyboard, faggot........

 

[Bodhi]

@Bodhi it's not worth being polemic or recriminating, skillful means pleighboi.

True

you got dharma fucked up B.

me?

Bambu

I see. Thank you for reminding me of the skillful path.

 

[(Nope)]

@Bodhi it's not worth being polemic or recriminating, skillful means pleighboi.

I wish all of you the best aside from Bambu, you got dharma fucked up B.

Nigga please.......

I never even had a dialogue with your pie ass.........

The God does not need or desire your well wishes.............

You mad cause Buddha shot fire and water outta his ass at the same damn time????

So many feelings, wikipedia has you punchdrunk. You should find a woman on this board you could harass and take your frustrations out on.

 

[bambu]

@Bodhi it's not worth being polemic or recriminating, skillful means pleighboi.

I wish all of you the best aside from Bambu, you got dharma fucked up B.

Nigga please.......

I never even had a dialogue with your pie ass.........

The God does not need or desire your well wishes.............

You mad cause Buddha shot fire and water outta his ass at the same damn time????

So many feelings, wikipedia has you punchdrunk. You should find a woman on this board you could harass and take your frustrations out on.

I prefer my women in the flesh.............

Why are you even addressing the God without proper tribute.?.?.?.?

 

[(Nope)]

I'm regressing, but I have some questions...

Weren't you previously banned for your hostility toward Kai?

(Is that just something you are going to avoid, I know you have an aversion to truth.)

Anyone who displays that much hatred towards a woman on the internet, might hate women?

(Allah don't like ugly)

You have the same disposition as an angry toddler, I'm wondering how many Keyboards you go through a week... Five? Ten? (Or do you fuck up your mouse more often with all that cut n' paste?)

 

[(Nope)]

@Bodhi it's not worth being polemic or recriminating, skillful means pleighboi.

True

you got dharma fucked up B.

me?

Bambu

I see. Thank you for reminding me of the skillful path.

I need to remind myself.

 

[bambu]

I'm regressing, but I have some questions...

Weren't you previously banned for your hostility toward Kai?

(Is that just something you are going to avoid, I know you have an aversion to truth.)

Anyone who displays that much hatred towards a woman on the internet, might hate women?

(Allah don't like ugly)

You have the same disposition as an angry toddler, I'm wondering how many Keyboards you go through a week... Five? Ten? (Or do you fuck up your mouse more often with all that cut n' paste?

No.....

I was banned for "being a bad debater" & "ignorant".......

However,

I have since won several debate series in this room.............

Proving that the shit was just politics..............

I was actually banned for ethering wack posters............

And where do you get the "hatred for women" shit...........

 

[(Nope)]

Hold up, I got that photo for you...

 

[bambu]

Niggas is mad cause they lausce.............

Fallback sissy.........

 

[DoUwant2go2Heaven]

The thing is their is nothing 'magical' that separates life from non-life. The hydrogen atoms that make up you and me are the same atoms in the heart of of star.

If there was always non-life there would still be non-life. Life produces life. Stop with the madness. God is the uncaused cause who has always and will always exist. Life is God and He has the power to create and destroy as He wills. The last day will put everybody in their rightful places. Amen.

 

[DoUwant2go2Heaven]

These guys are used to the kind of oversimplification that the Bible is saturated with and want to view actual science the same way. That is why its so difficult for them to comprehend a simple article and say things like life came from rocks or single cell organisms decided to turn into giraffes.

Your convoluted jargon is fruitless. There is simplicity in Christ Jesus. So simple that even a child can understand the truth of God. The wisdom you kick is foolishness to God because it's the wisdom of this world, the same wisdom that God destroyes with His simplicity.

Case and point this thread. Amen.

 

[DoUwant2go2Heaven]

You guys are discounting what rocks are actually made of. If rocks (or minerals) weren't important, then wouldn't consume Iron, silver, sulfar, phosphorus, magnesium etc as a part of our natural diet.

No one is disputing their importance, i am discounting the claim that life originated from the process called abiogenesis.

That's just my point. How can you discount such a thing when it is obvious that we are made up of the same materials that you claim to be simple rocks.

Life being composed of many elements is clear but those things coming together by themselves to create a self producing organism is one of the problems with abiogenesis.

Why use those same elements then? Why the convoluted process of requiring a continuation of their use to stay alive? You don't know the process entirely to discount it. What is accurate is that some how those things did come together and we still need to consume more of those things to keep together.

Are you seriously asking me why life was made the way it is? Lol. Non-life does not eat non-life only life consumes non-life to keep on living. life needing to consume non life does not explain the genesis of life.

Yes, why use the material in such a way to make us an force us into a pattern of continuous consumption to stay alive. Seems pointless as a goal for perfect creation in the likeness of a God.

I can never tell you why god created the universe the way he did,

But actually when i think about it continuous consumption of life and non-life is a perfect system of life sustainability. We are the food of future life and we consume the life and non-life that life of the past was composed of.

That doesn't sound like a perfect system to me. Sounds like to many steps in a process. Perfect to me would be never requiring consumption and having a body that can never be injured or loose form. Of course, you would loose adaptation at that point, but perfect wouldn't require a need to adapt. We would work out of the box in all environments. Matter fact, perfect is having spring day and never experiencing a Winter.

Sin, ever heard of it?

 

[DoUwant2go2Heaven]

These guys are used to the kind of oversimplification that the Bible is saturated with and want to view actual science the same way. That is why its so difficult for them to comprehend a simple article and say things like life came from rocks or single cell organisms decided to turn into giraffes.

you probably never heard of abiogenesis before i brought it up.

prove it.

Its well documented that you've been the student on a great number of topics discussed between the two of us. You should humble yourself.

I can't prove it nor do i care too.

then you should have kept that comment to yourself. Try to have a mature conversation today without all the unnecessary bs

Me calling you a hypocrite is pertinent to the conversation because you cannot propose that what i believe is less worthy of consideration or irrational meanwhile you hold beliefs that are also not rational. As you say, we have had many other discussions about similar topics in the past and being that you have never brung up abiogenesis in any of these conversions, is it logical for me to assume that you never knew about the theory.

You never brought it up either.

And I don't believe in God; I think the whole theory is irrational, sure.. but that does not make me hypocritical just because you believe whatever theory you think I hold to is irrational.

The teachings of buddha are just as irrational as the teachings of any other religion because they are not objectively provable or testable.

Objectively speaking Buddhism is irrational, christianity is irrational so it's not about the THEORY I believe you hold. If you hold any theory that is not provable and testable you are being irrational, but IF you still bash others for also holding onto subjective theories then that is being hypocrirical.

I'm glad you've come to accept that Christianity is irrational. However, I don't think that way about the dhamma.

Its odd that you continue to follow an irrational theory.

Believing in it is irrational because you cannot prove the existence of god

Exactly. The Buddha said to only believe in what you can prove:

"So, as I said, Kalamas: 'Don't go by reports, by legends, by traditions, by scripture, by logical conjecture, by inference, by analogies, by agreement through pondering views, by probability, or by the thought, "This contemplative is our teacher." When you know for yourselves that, "These qualities are unskillful; these qualities are blameworthy; these qualities are criticized by the wise; these qualities, when adopted & carried out, lead to harm & to suffering" — then you should abandon them.' Thus was it said. And in reference to this was it said.

"Now, Kalamas, don't go by reports, by legends, by traditions, by scripture, by logical conjecture, by inference, by analogies, by agreement through pondering views, by probability, or by the thought, 'This contemplative is our teacher.' When you know for yourselves that, 'These qualities are skillful; these qualities are blameless; these qualities are praised by the wise; these qualities, when adopted & carried out, lead to welfare & to happiness' — then you should enter & remain in them.

Open your eyes and the proof is there. Stop being blinded by the enemy. Amen.