Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
twentyfivelighters;c-9878120 said:You don't be posting in NBA threads muthafucka
the_focused_one;c-9927269 said:To be safe, Dubs in 6... Probably 5.
It wouldn't even be close. The Warriors depth and offensive firepower would overwhelm the Bulls. They never faced a team anywhere near as loaded as Golden State in the finals.
HafBayked;c-9927298 said:the_focused_one;c-9927269 said:To be safe, Dubs in 6... Probably 5.
It wouldn't even be close. The Warriors depth and offensive firepower would overwhelm the Bulls. They never faced a team anywhere near as loaded as Golden State in the finals.
if the 90's rules were in play a whole lot of that fire power would be void....Draymond gettin ejected after Rodman picks on him for a few mins......Klay got a job on his hands....Steph gone be tired and aggravated
it aint shit you can do about a 7 foot shooter in either scenario lol
the_focused_one;c-9930465 said:HafBayked;c-9927298 said:the_focused_one;c-9927269 said:To be safe, Dubs in 6... Probably 5.
It wouldn't even be close. The Warriors depth and offensive firepower would overwhelm the Bulls. They never faced a team anywhere near as loaded as Golden State in the finals.
if the 90's rules were in play a whole lot of that fire power would be void....Draymond gettin ejected after Rodman picks on him for a few mins......Klay got a job on his hands....Steph gone be tired and aggravated
it aint shit you can do about a 7 foot shooter in either scenario lol
How so? Even with Scottie doin' his thing as the greatest perimeter guard and MJ not too far behind, there is only so much Pip could do against Durant, and MJ could probably lockdown Klay without too much problem, but Harper wouldn't keep up against Curry. Plus there is no evidence of any of them stoppin' the long 3, especially during the two years the 3 point was moved UP to only 22 ft.
As for Rodman getting to Draymond... perhaps. But would Draymond get ejected though? Since cats LOVE to talk about how PHYSICAL the game was in the 90s (a myth propagated by YouTube compilations and ESPN), who's to say Draymond doesn't get to Rodman as well?
Also, Rodman made his bread and butter as an INTERIOR defender. Draymond would force him out of the paint with his 3 ball and off ball movement. Rodman would be much more challenged than usual having to follow Draymond everywhere on the court, especially with the ILLEGAL DEFENSE rule back in play.
What it would really come down to in a 90s era Finals is 3 things:
1) How many 3s could the Bulls defense limit WHILE ALSO having to guard the Dubs MAN TO MAN with NO OFF BALL DOUBLE TEAMS.
2) How the Bulls bench would be able to do ANYTHING effective against the Warriors bench.
3) How many free-throws would the officials give Jordan to keep the gap close enough for the Bulls to have a chance in the 4th quarter of games.
I swear cats haven't really thought this thing through...
HafBayked;c-9930473 said:the_focused_one;c-9930465 said:HafBayked;c-9927298 said:the_focused_one;c-9927269 said:To be safe, Dubs in 6... Probably 5.
It wouldn't even be close. The Warriors depth and offensive firepower would overwhelm the Bulls. They never faced a team anywhere near as loaded as Golden State in the finals.
if the 90's rules were in play a whole lot of that fire power would be void....Draymond gettin ejected after Rodman picks on him for a few mins......Klay got a job on his hands....Steph gone be tired and aggravated
it aint shit you can do about a 7 foot shooter in either scenario lol
How so? Even with Scottie doin' his thing as the greatest perimeter guard and MJ not too far behind, there is only so much Pip could do against Durant, and MJ could probably lockdown Klay without too much problem, but Harper wouldn't keep up against Curry. Plus there is no evidence of any of them stoppin' the long 3, especially during the two years the 3 point was moved UP to only 22 ft.
As for Rodman getting to Draymond... perhaps. But would Draymond get ejected though? Since cats LOVE to talk about how PHYSICAL the game was in the 90s (a myth propagated by YouTube compilations and ESPN), who's to say Draymond doesn't get to Rodman as well?
Also, Rodman made his bread and butter as an INTERIOR defender. Draymond would force him out of the paint with his 3 ball and off ball movement. Rodman would be much more challenged than usual having to follow Draymond everywhere on the court, especially with the ILLEGAL DEFENSE rule back in play.
What it would really come down to in a 90s era Finals is 3 things:
1) How many 3s could the Bulls defense limit WHILE ALSO having to guard the Dubs MAN TO MAN with NO OFF BALL DOUBLE TEAMS.
2) How the Bulls bench would be able to do ANYTHING effective against the Warriors bench.
3) How many free-throws would the officials give Jordan to keep the gap close enough for the Bulls to have a chance in the 4th quarter of games.
I swear cats haven't really thought this thing through...
we see you have.....for 2 days
I must be allowed at least that much time to prepare my thesis
HafBayked;c-9930525 said:Jokes man but yeah I didnt run thru all that shit
I still had the Warriors taking it in the same number of games
just dont see them firing up the 97 Bulls the way they do current teams
it aint gone run as smooth
Trollio ;c-9930762 said:So basically its only 1 team that can stop the dubs....
Dream team.
Its the voltron of all voltrons
the_focused_one;c-9930831 said:Trollio ;c-9930762 said:So basically its only 1 team that can stop the dubs....
Dream team.
Its the voltron of all voltrons
Maybe. LMAO.