wow. Court Rules Severely Disabled Woman Wasn't Raped Because She Didn't 'Bite, Kick or Scratch' Her

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
that shit is beyond fucked up

BunkHeadShaking.gif
 
Covet;4972417 said:
Nike Cortez;4972398 said:
If she cant communicate, how do they know it was rape anyway? She prolly wanted the D and the dude was performing a service to her bcuz he's a nice guy... She prolly had the best orgasm of her mentally challenged life and niggas trying to call her a victim..

The system is all fucked up b..

On every one of these rape posts you guys come in saying it probably wasn't rape and she wanted it. What the fuck dude? Are you serious?

Did you even read this freaking article?

The article never detailed the rape or how the charges came about b

Women see the word rape and automatically go into advocacy mode...nah b red cross dont post here

 
thats terrible....but dude didnt write them books....this just exposes another flaw in our system, which imo will never be perfect....im sure some shit will be flipped a little b/c of this, but how many times has that really been put to test in court?
 
Okay get ready to crucify me but...

In all honest why the fuck are we paying for people like this to even live? Why are we wasting resources on that kind of human being... what the fuck are they to contribute back?

Seriously, had we been following a strict eugenics regiment to rid the earth of the unworthy this would not be an issue.
 
RodrigueZz;4972449 said:
Okay get ready to crucify me but...

In all honest why the fuck are we paying for people like this to even live? Why are we wasting resources on that kind of human being... what the fuck are they to contribute back?

Seriously, had we been following a strict eugenics regiment to rid the earth of the unworthy this would not be an issue.

I'm gonna give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you're talking about the rapist and not the victim.
 
RodrigueZz;4972449 said:
Okay get ready to crucify me but...

In all honest why the fuck are we paying for people like this to even live? Why are we wasting resources on that kind of human being... what the fuck are they to contribute back?

Seriously, had we been following a strict eugenics regiment to rid the earth of the unworthy this would not be an issue.

I've been saying this for a while b..

Buuuuuuuut..the way the world views breeding is like the old lady with a house full of cats but only enough resources to take care of two or three comfortably
 
Sneak Dissa;4972463 said:
RodrigueZz;4972449 said:
Okay get ready to crucify me but...

In all honest why the fuck are we paying for people like this to even live? Why are we wasting resources on that kind of human being... what the fuck are they to contribute back?

Seriously, had we been following a strict eugenics regiment to rid the earth of the unworthy this would not be an issue.

I'm gonna give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you're talking about the rapist and not the victim.

Well the rapist was not a rapist until the alleged incident.. the retard was a retard for years and years prior to the incident. All the luxuries that retard has enjoyed have been, in my opinion, wasted.

Some criminals are beyond correction and should be evicted from earth immediately as well so as to preserve resources for people that actually matter.

 
The Nazis performed Eugenics on the basis of ethnicity and religion which are bullshit traits to judge someone's value by. Testing organisms for intelligence, physically capability, mental stability, and other actually significant characteristics is far superior. Furthermore, to condemn the idea of eugenics solely because of Hitler is a genetic fallacy. Mon Santo seems to be putting in work in this area.

I do agree with Euthanasia though.
 
Last edited:
Maybe I'm missing something in the story but someone being mentally /physically challenged doesn't automatically mean they've been raped. It does still have to be proven if I'm correct.
 
Last edited:
7fIG;4972567 said:
Maybe I'm missing something in the story but someone being mentally /physically challenged doesn't automatically mean they've been raped. It does still have be proven if I'm not correct.

Of course. Just because someone is functioning at a lower intellectual level does not mean that they are incapable of giving consent. Their grounds for consent though, or rather the lack thereof, is a little ridiculous. When individuals experience something traumatic they often go into shock so expecting someone, moreover a retard, to be fighting to get away may be a bit excessive. At least in my mind.
 
RodrigueZz;4972476 said:
Sneak Dissa;4972463 said:
RodrigueZz;4972449 said:
Okay get ready to crucify me but...

In all honest why the fuck are we paying for people like this to even live? Why are we wasting resources on that kind of human being... what the fuck are they to contribute back?

Seriously, had we been following a strict eugenics regiment to rid the earth of the unworthy this would not be an issue.

I'm gonna give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you're talking about the rapist and not the victim.

Well the rapist was not a rapist until the alleged incident.. the retard was a retard for years and years prior to the incident. All the luxuries that retard has enjoyed have been, in my opinion, wasted.

Some criminals are beyond correction and should be evicted from earth immediately as well so as to preserve resources for people that actually matter.

What luxuries are you talking about that got wasted by "allowing" someone to live that's presumably done no harm to the world or society?

Why do you think you're paying for her to live?

What value do you bring to society as a whole that justifies your existence above someone hers?
 
Sneak Dissa;4972610 said:
RodrigueZz;4972476 said:
Sneak Dissa;4972463 said:
RodrigueZz;4972449 said:
Okay get ready to crucify me but...

In all honest why the fuck are we paying for people like this to even live? Why are we wasting resources on that kind of human being... what the fuck are they to contribute back?

Seriously, had we been following a strict eugenics regiment to rid the earth of the unworthy this would not be an issue.

I'm gonna give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you're talking about the rapist and not the victim.

Well the rapist was not a rapist until the alleged incident.. the retard was a retard for years and years prior to the incident. All the luxuries that retard has enjoyed have been, in my opinion, wasted.

Some criminals are beyond correction and should be evicted from earth immediately as well so as to preserve resources for people that actually matter.

What luxuries are you talking about that got wasted by "allowing" someone to live that's presumably done no harm to the world or society?

Why do you think you're paying for her to live?

What value do you bring to society as a whole that justifies your existence above someone hers?

Unlike many of the mentally handicapped I work and pay taxes which pay for the innumerable social services that the citizens of my country get to enjoy. Someone like that likely enjoys far more medical care than a healthy sane person like myself does, thus they are a bigger burden on the health care system that I pay into. Furthermore, seeing as we need special teachers and other professionals in government institutions to handle these kinds of people that is another waste of tax dollars there. That money could easily be buying some gifted students new microscopes or some normal kids newer textbooks.

Considering that someone like that will likely never attain the education I have I will therefore fulfill a bigger role in society as well. Rather than being someone who needs care, I can be a provider of it, unlike them. The list goes on. I don't know how you thought I would have a hard time proving I'm more valuable than someone with the mental functionality of a 3 year old.
 
So how do you prove that she said yes / no - if there's no evidence ?

Or do you just convict the dude because she has cerebral palsy ?
 
Covet;4972634 said:
RodrigueZz;4972515 said:
The Nazis performed Eugenics on the basis of ethnicity and religion which are bullshit traits to judge someone's value by. Testing organisms for intelligence, physically capability, mental stability, and other actually significant characteristics is far superior. Furthermore, to condemn the idea of eugenics solely because of Hitler is a genetic fallacy. Mon Santo seems to be putting in work in this area.

I do agree with Euthanasia though.

You really believe that eugenics should be put into place? I thought you were trying to troll me. Ugh. So do you have any average illnesses? Like Asthma? Do you have any average disabilities? Like nearsightedness or farsightedness? These things may be judged as being done away with with Eugenics.

It's not your decision. It's the decision of the government.

You also are judging on mental stability. So within what IQ range should we let live? 140 or higher sounds about right. That's genius level. Therefore only the brightest are left to stay alive.

Wait do you have a learning disability? Let's kill you off. Yes, only the brightest should survive.

Easy solution....

Now let's have the best and brightest mate. Set times for when we mate because we must match the right people together to have the correct breed of people we want! It must be at certain specific ages too because the chance for mental retardation goes up if conceived after these ages.

Do you see how asinine this is?

^^^^

*house full of cats and only 1 litterbox post*

 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
72
Views
68
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…