What are your opinions on the reaction feature?

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
Jamaica;4259365 said:
Should only mods be able to see it?

Not sure on that point I am sure everyone would want to see but does everyone need to? that said Probably not we as Mods should use it like a tool to guage abuse but I would not be offended if everyone could view either way. That and the ability to view IP's accounts/aliases would be helpful...
 
Last edited:
sionb55;4260163 said:
Jamaica;4259365 said:
Should only mods be able to see it?

hhmmmm nah, I think posters should be able to see it too. They're who I got the idea from LOLOL. Also if there are posters abusing the reactions and flags, sometimes a poster might reach out to us and let us know especially if say we're not aware of it at first. Might be a good way to extend a working relationship with posters and the mods.

Better that than no one being able to see reactions at all. But I agree with your point.

 
mods need to see who is giving the reactions. posters dont.

why???

because if someone gives an average poster a wack, he will then go find five of that posters post and wack all 5 for revenge

fact is i see feelings being giving out even if a post says something as small as "co sign". how the hell can co sign a post be feelings??

if a threadstarter isnt liked by say 4 posters, any thread he makes is sure to get wacked or trolled by any of those posters no matter the quality of the thread.

h rap just made a thread about young buck having to sell his intellectual properties. he got a flag for trolling!! how is that trolling?? LOL he made a thread title and then posted an article. its not like he went on a rant about hating 50 cent.

the reactions are garbage if they cant be governed AND EDITED. MODS SHOULD BE ABLE TO TAKE AWAY FALSE REACTIONS THAT ARE GIVEN
 
Thulsa Doom;4263641 said:
maybe you niggas need to quit being so wack!!!

how i talk more shit then any other mod on here, yet i aint got all that negative bullshit going on?

you niggas just want to destroy your enemies... whereas i just want to embarrass everybody...
but your shit is viewed in most cases as more Comical and speaking for myself I have a dedicated bunch of cyberstalkers whom I have hurt the feelings of by being bluntly honest and then verbally annhilating when they threw a hissy bitch fit. Because of that I get flagged on just about any post they see of mine(Thus the reason I dialed back postin) H-rap has a even more dedicated fanbase of haters so the shit get ridiculous, I mean kats are truly lonely to the point of going thread to thread calling out names hoping to get my attention in the past. Never mind I am just ranting but yeah What Uptown said lol...

 
The user and all related content has been deleted.
 
Last edited:
Thulsa Doom;4264906 said:
Soloman the Wise;4264760 said:
Thulsa Doom;4263641 said:
maybe you niggas need to quit being so wack!!!

how i talk more shit then any other mod on here, yet i aint got all that negative bullshit going on?

you niggas just want to destroy your enemies... whereas i just want to embarrass everybody...
but your shit is viewed in most cases as more Comical and speaking for myself I have a dedicated bunch of cyberstalkers whom I have hurt the feelings of by being bluntly honest and then verbally annhilating when they threw a hissy bitch fit. Because of that I get flagged on just about any post they see of mine(Thus the reason I dialed back postin) H-rap has a even more dedicated fanbase of haters so the shit get ridiculous, I mean kats are truly lonely to the point of going thread to thread calling out names hoping to get my attention in the past. Never mind I am just ranting but yeah What Uptown said lol...

lmao i've posted peoples mothers...

top that...

LMFBAO yeah but people on this site seem to care less about their family and selfs then they do about their rapper man crushes...
 
UPTOWN CONNEXX;4263257 said:
mods need to see who is giving the reactions. posters dont.

why???

because if someone gives an average poster a wack, he will then go find five of that posters post and wack all 5 for revenge

fact is i see feelings being giving out even if a post says something as small as "co sign". how the hell can co sign a post be feelings??

if a threadstarter isnt liked by say 4 posters, any thread he makes is sure to get wacked or trolled by any of those posters no matter the quality of the thread.

h rap just made a thread about young buck having to sell his intellectual properties. he got a flag for trolling!! how is that trolling?? LOL he made a thread title and then posted an article. its not like he went on a rant about hating 50 cent.

the reactions are garbage if they cant be governed AND EDITED. MODS SHOULD BE ABLE TO TAKE AWAY FALSE REACTIONS THAT ARE GIVEN

This, we as mods get flack as well when doing our jobs. I got a wack yesterday for closing this thread rather than deleting it:

'How come niggas be pickin on this poor girl Jihad, calling her ugly, when Haute still posts?'

I posted the slogan for The Reason and closed the thread and I got a wack lol.

People definitely abuse the system and it's a shame. I also think they get jealous 'cos even the great posts that get like 4 GOATs end up with one flag or wack by the jealous posters… and I say jealous as sometimes, they're great additions to the thread and aren't even going at another poster or artist… but simply adding factual information or news to the thread.

In closing, some posters here are wack and we as mods should be able to spark a system were they receive 10 wacks if they're trolling. They could be notified of the possibility of this beforehand and if they continue to do so, then another mod flagging them for the same thing will tick the system into giving them 10 wacks + a one day ban.

I.e. two warnings = 10 wacks and a one day ban.

That way, we're not deciding when they receive the 10 wacks/day ban and we're simply warning them of other possibilities of mods warning them for the same thing, resulting in ten wacks being given to them and the day ban.

That's just an off-the-top conclusion to how to resolve this, I'm sure it can be developed upon…

Just putting it out there…
 
Last edited:
In fact, we as mods should be able to see a posters given reactions (i.e. the ones they've given to everyone else) as a summary.

I.e. RuffDraft has given 60 co-signs, 20 GOATS and 3 Ethers compared with 5 wacks and 2 feelings.

That way, we could see whether a poster was abusing it just from those stats alone.

I.e. if poster A had 3 co-signs, 2 GOATs, 3 Ethers compared with 120 wacks and 150 feelings.

Then we could ban that poster for abusing the system.
 
Last edited:

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
29
Views
2
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…