The Undertakers streak vs Goldberg's streak: Whose was better & more shocking when it ended?

[Dupac]

goldberg's streak was better...

yea i said it.......

undertaker's ended better though

 

[KNiGHTS]

What? Undertaker.

Goldberg beat Mullet Man about 153 of those 173 times.

I understand it's scripted, but come on. I didn't even flinch when Goldberg lost. I heard the Undertaker lost and literally had to go watch the match to see if y'all weren't bullshitting. I sat there like, "Yooooo...."

 

[Dupac]

yea, but undertaker's character was more than his streak, he had story lines for days....his dopest shit wasn't even his streak.....his hell in the cell shit>>>>>>

but goldberg WAS his streak.. once goldberg lost....his prestige wasn't even the same

 

[Siqnih Da Trapper]

Really?

 

[DOPEdweebz]

Goldbers streak was legit too (e entho b4 his first winhe technicallylostat a house show). Butyou could find footage of all his wins. I remberedwhen he beat Hugh Morris and Meng like nothing in 97, and I was like this Stone Cold lookingmotherfucker gonna be the shit.

It was just better imo even if you didnt like him for whatever reason.

 

[Trollio]

Nash would end the streak

scust

 

[lazypakman]

funny this topic came up because i watched the nash vs goldberg match last night (purchased nwo : the revolution blu ray)

That Goldberg streak was epic though.it wasn't necessarily about who he was beating,but how they went about doing it.

to just have this guy come to the ring,run through someone in a matter of minutes and then just leave rarely giving an interview or even saying anything at all, look at the time it took from when he was green to when he became a genuine superstar......they booked that arc flawlessly.

i agree the end of the Undertaker's was more shocking,more so because it was clean.

 

[Siqnih Da Trapper]

Ryback had a streak going lol

 

[Peezy_Jenkins]

both were ended by HORRIBLE choices, takers was more shocking tho

 

[Siqnih Da Trapper]

both were ended by HORRIBLE choices, takers was more shocking tho

Who told u to post???

 

[jono]

There's no competition one is built up over 20 years, the other lasted about 2 years.

There was no good way to end either one, I respectfully shit on both Nash & Lesnar but ultimately it's not really their fault....well it is Nash fault since he was booking himself.

 

[VIBE]

Streak vs streak, Goldberg has it.

I probably didn't even see half of who he faced but from what I did, dude was beast and the way he was able to do it was crazy as fuck. Granted, it's scripted but it was done well.

Undertakers streak at Mania was something I never truly cared for. I never thought it was awesome or anything. I just waited for it to get stopped.

As for shock vs shock, Undertaker. Simply because we never thought he would lose at Mania. Goldbergs defeat could've been huge but they didn't do it very well at all. It was so lackluster.

Both matches in where their streaks were defeated sucked though. You would fogure, ending a streak should've been done in epic fashion but both failed to deliver that.

 

[Peezy_Jenkins]

both were ended by HORRIBLE choices, takers was more shocking tho

Who told u to post???

u claim 2 teams, u beneath me

 

[BeleeDatPleighboy]

Goldbergs was more dominant in the fact that he was undefeated PERIOD. Again it is scripted...but to not loose for damn near two years...in the "modern era" of the business >>>

While impressive, I totally agree with @vibe about Takers streak...It was more about the story and character behind the streak. His streak did yield some classic matches tho.

 

[Sour-Cream]

Goldberg the GOAT

 

[mikelewis]

Didn't Goldberg's streak come against a lot of jobbers, while Taker's came against a lot of main eventers??

Granted it was a longer streak, but beating Norman Smiley and Disco Inferno on a weekly basis isn't as great as beating some of the bigger names.

 

[lazypakman]

yes,because Giant Gonzalez,King Kong Bundy and Mark Henry were all premium opposition weren't they?

 

[Dupac]

bruh watching goldberg squash jobbers was the highlight of every nitro

 

[its....JOHN B]

funny this topic came up because i watched the nash vs goldberg match last night (purchased nwo : the revolution blu ray)

That Goldberg streak was epic though.it wasn't necessarily about who he was beating,but how they went about doing it.

to just have this guy come to the ring,run through someone in a matter of minutes and then just leave rarely giving an interview or even saying anything at all, look at the time it took from when he was green to when he became a genuine superstar......they booked that arc flawlessly.

i agree the end of the Undertaker's was more shocking,more so because it was clean.

Is that available on the wwe network?

 

[jono]

yes,because Giant Gonzalez,King Kong Bundy and Mark Henry were all premium opposition weren't they?

King Kong Bundy main evented Wrestlemania 2 and Mark Henry is a world champion.

Goldberg streak is full of squash matches against nobodies that weren't even worth beating. Then he finally starting wrestling people that matter and the matches weren't even any better. Then he won the title, the title run was boring as fuck and only thing memorable about it was him losing.

In fact that's the only memorable thing about Goldberg streak period is when he lost. How many of those almost 200 matches are must see classics against highly rated or main event opponents?

As far as im concerned that nigga is the white Tatanka (who also went undefeated for two years) except he won a world title.