Super Mario Run Sparks Princess Peach ‘Sexism’ Concerns

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date

gns

New member
Smmfh

Video games are supposed to shape kids now?

$50 sez the bitches that are complaining bare a strong resemblance to meg

8F8aahq.png


 
Bowser play way too damn much. It aint een like he be tryna fuck or nothin. You'd think somebody that owned 7 or 8 castles and numerous small fortresses would have enough money to buy all the IG pussy he wanted and giv'em that Saudi Prince treatment. Instead he still bullshittin with Peach ole raggedy ass.

If we gon be outraged, lets be mad about that.
 
Super Mario is like a fairytale. That's just the story. Mario saves the princess. I hate shit like this.
 
its too late mane smh....

they tried to tell us long ago to fight this shit but some of us wanted to pander to the ladies

they will be THE men soon

maybe Luigi should have been making Jello Jigglers and sipping wine while the Princess chopped wood and smoked cigars smh
 
If you're playing Mario for the story you got rocks in your head. It's a platformer. All

About the gameplay.

Anyway you can play as Peach in the game. She has her own unique characteristics. Just like old western Mario 2.
 
1CK1S;d-554114 said:
Super Mario Run players express concerns that the game features a ‘sexist’ portrayal of Princess Peach. Some players argue that Peach’s portrayal in the game is ‘antiquated’ and supports harmful stereotypes about women.

Super Mario Run is the latest hit mobile game based on a Nintendo franchise, with Pokemon GO taking the world by storm earlier this year.

Some players say that Super Mario Run, a platforming game on iOS, is sexist. In the game’s World Tour mode, Princess Peach invites Mario to a party at her castle and offers to bake him a cake. Gaming’s best-known royal is then kidnapped by (notorious Mario-universe villain) Bowser and players must progress through 24 levels to rescue Princess Peach and unlock her as a playable character.

While Mario rescuing Princess Peach has been a big part of the Mario franchise ever since the character was first introduced in the 1980s, on social media, some players say that Super Mario Run offered Nintendo a chance to put forward a new plot. The company had an opportunity to do away with the sexist notion that Princess Peach needs to be rescued, that’s she’s helpless and cannot defend herself, but it chose to embrace that trope once more instead.

That Princess Peach is baking a cake – rather than DJ-ing at the party or some other task – has also drawn criticism. ‘Women belong in the kitchen/women only know how to bake’ is a common sexist stereotype. There’s nothing wrong with baking, of course, but some believe that it’s the only thing that women (and female characters) are good for and the argument is that combined with Peach’s ‘helplessness,’ Super Mario Run is helping to reinforce that line of sexist thinking.

Many players have also pointed out that Super Mario Run is the first time that many people – particularly young girls and women – may have interacted with a Nintendo game or the Mario franchise and that reshaping the series’ portrayal of Princess Peach could have seen the company win over many new fans.

With Super Mario Run having set records when it launched on iOS devices last week, there’s no indication that Peach’s portrayal has limited the game’s success so far. However, with just three levels being available for free and the full World Tour campaign being locked behind a $10 paywall, the reluctance to pay to play through the rest of the ‘sexist’ plot could potentially have an impact on Nintendo’s earnings.

At this point it’s unclear whether Nintendo will update the game to address concerns, or what the company’s plans are for Mario games are going forward. We’ll keep you posted should the company release an official comment.

large.jpg


 
OP could have made the whole shit up though, where's the link for this article? What's the source? If it's some no name small town newspaper or something then who gives a shit, if it's the New York Times then that's something different
 
vespesianus;c-9565710 said:
OP could have made the whole shit up though, where's the link for this article? What's the source? If it's some no name small town newspaper or something then who gives a shit, if it's the New York Times then that's something different

Yeah this is the only place where I seen this article
 
So yall havent heard of Google? Its from the NY Times. They went as far as to say it wasnt a "family friendly game" lol
 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
24
Views
3
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…