Is there any justification for having (biological) children?

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date

KTULU IS BACK

New member
How you gonna decide who should reproduce though?
 
Last edited:
KTULU IS BACK;2140120 said:
How you gonna decide who should reproduce though?

That refers more to the ecological argument against breeding. People should have a right to reproductive autonomy (only because I think the consequences of denying them this right would do more harm than good), some people will always choose to have children but it would make a big difference if most people were convinced not to. I would hope that the ones who do decided to continue breeding would be among the most intelligent, compassionate and healthy (those who have a genetic disposition to cheerfulness and optimism and are less likely to pass on harmful genetic diseases/conditions or a tendency towards anti-social behavior).
 
Last edited:
Although I'd call bullshit on the climate change predictions, I do think the world is overpopulated and the genetic quality of the species is too low. So not everyone should reproduce.

If I willingly procreated, it would be to see if I could produce another version of myself, and what the results would be.
 
Last edited:
Huruma;2140232 said:
I would hope that the ones who do decided to continue breeding would be among the most intelligent, compassionate and healthy

Idiocracy. Not the best movie, but the premise is valid.
 
Last edited:
i have yet to hear a sound reason for anybody to have children.

Its just a biological urge to reproduce that mostly all living beings have. Compounded by the fact that societies idea of social success & fulfillment is a "family."

I dont share that view.
 
Last edited:
Isn't this one of the theories for homosexuality existing?
 
Last edited:
Why should people be forced to take care of some fool's kids when we could make are own? Wouldn't be fair at all, the dumb ass gets to continue his/her gene line, while smarter people are forced to raise them. (excluding kids that are orphans due to their parents dying)

But yeah, people need to stop having all these babies.
 
Last edited:
glowy;2141104 said:
Why should people be forced to take care of some fool's kids when we could make are own? Wouldn't be fair at all, the dumb ass gets to continue his/her gene line, while smarter people are forced to raise them. (excluding kids that are orphans due to their parents dying)

But yeah, people need to stop having all these babies.

You do realize the overpopulation thread starter is referencing comes from underdeveloped countries right....

Which leads to my question for the T/S. So overpopulation is the problem right. Well what has caused said problem? Me thinks you woke up and thought you had a grand idea instead of doing some real research.
 
Last edited:
smart dumb nigga thread. prime example of when mental masturbation goes wrong. btw...overpopulation is a myth.
 
Last edited:
judahxulu;2141363 said:
smart dumb nigga thread. prime example of when mental masturbation goes wrong. btw...overpopulation is a myth.

I'll agree with the first part of you post

but it being a myth??? wtf are you talking about
 
Last edited:
tru_m.a.c;2141499 said:
I'll agree with the first part of you post

but it being a myth??? wtf are you talking about
The world is NOT overpopulated. You can fit the entire world's population in the state of Texas with the same density of the population of Tokyo.

People think the world is over populated for 2 reasons:


1. Everybody says it and when you say something enough people dont bother to see if it's really true they just accept it.

2. European + American's are greedy and steal other people's resources and when there is a crisis in the land's they steal from they say, "oooh well there isnt enough water in the world. We have a water shortage. There isnt enough food in the world for all these people."

But there is plenty of water & plenty of food. Just that Americans and Europeans consume way more than what we need to survive and leave everybody else with next to nothing. So instead of just admitting that and changing the easiest conclusion to come to is, "well...must be too many muthafukkas on the planet I guess."
 
Last edited:
Darxwell;2141546 said:
The world is NOT overpopulated. You can fit the entire world's population in the state of Texas with the same density of the population of Tokyo.


Proof? I think that's drastically overstated.

And I agree population density isn't as dire as ppl make it.

Darxwell;2141546 said:
there is plenty of water & plenty of food. Just that Americans and Europeans consume way more than what we need to survive and leave everybody else with next to nothing. So instead of just admitting that and changing the easiest conclusion to come to is, "well...must be too many muthafukkas on the planet I guess."

At least we both agree that there is a finite amount of resources but an ever increasing rate of consumption amongst humans. That consumption part we both agree gets distorted.

But as I say this, if the UN came back with a report (and they may have already) that says Americans/Europeans have to knock their consumption down to pre Vietnam (just throwing out a time period) which would effect: oil, water, food, clothing.....you would be agree to live your life that way?

I hate to quote the internet phrase, "Once you see it, you can't unsee it," but once you live a modern American lifestlye its kind of hard to go back. Of course this depends on how far back we would have to live.

I'm all for moderation by the way.....
 
Last edited:
tru_m.a.c;2141207 said:
You do realize the overpopulation thread starter is referencing comes from underdeveloped countries right....

Which leads to my question for the T/S. So overpopulation is the problem right. Well what has caused said problem? Me thinks you woke up and thought you had a grand idea instead of doing some real research.

I was under the impression that he was talking about all humans, and the reference was directed at all humans. We could just kill the unwanted children, but people wont have that....

(well yes they will, as long as they don't know about it, and don't have to get their hands dirty)
 
Last edited:
Darxwell;2140788 said:
i have yet to hear a sound reason for anybody to have children.

Its just a biological urge to reproduce that mostly all living beings have. Compounded by the fact that societies idea of social success & fulfillment is a "family."

I dont share that view.

I would argue that most humans have a biological urge to mate (and a psychological urge to nurture and form close, familial relationships), the idea of 'living on through your genes' is a cultural one. Humans are probably the only animals who realize that sex leads to offspring and are even aware of the concept of genetic inheritance.

As for overpopulation, I'm aware that people starve for political reasons, not because there isn't enough food to go around. The world is probably capable of feeding 12 billion humans. My concern was with the carbon footprint of a larger population and how this will further contribute to anthropogenic global warming, not about running out of food and clean water (although global warming will negatively effect crop production).

Fiat,

There's empirical research to support 'my' predictions.
 
Last edited:
Huruma;2142743 said:
...Fiat,

There's empirical research to support 'my' predictions.
...Climate change will be unbelievable in a few decades, and even more so in a few centuries. Soon, the planet will be unrecognizable and almost uninhabitable by human beings....
Proof/link?

Or are these some kind of "worst case scenario" theories?
 
Last edited:
judahxulu;2141363 said:
smart dumb nigga thread. prime example of when mental masturbation goes wrong. btw...overpopulation is a myth.

no its not.........
 
Last edited:
jonlakadeadmic;2143078 said:
no its not.........

Yes it is, as Darx already stated, we live off of wasteful models for life in the west. Vertical greenhouses replacing office buildings of the same height can solve a lot of the food shortages. We could put everyone in the world in comfortable sized condos scattered through out america, and have the rest of the world as wilderness.

Cats are just livin it up right now and dont want to be taken out of their comfort zone, so they hype up hyperdense 3rd - 1st world communities as an excuse to tell everyone to cut back everyones lifestyle, while the dudes cakin at the top continue to exploit land for fun, leisure and resources.
 
Last edited:
jonlakadeadmic;2143078 said:
no its not.........

What they really mean by 'over population' is: the world is full of undesirable humans
 
Last edited:

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
BiblicalAtheist,
Replies
33
Views
74
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…