IF WE ALL CAME FROM ADAM and EVE, WHY ARENT WE ALL RELATED?

[DRO]

Genesis 1:26-28

New International Version (NIV)

26 Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals,[a] and over all the creatures that move along the ground.”

27 So God created mankind in his own image,
in the image of God he created them;
male and female he created them.

28 God blessed them and said to them, “Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky and over every living creature that moves on the ground.”

Genesis 2:7

New International Version (NIV)

7 Then the LORD God formed a man[a] from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being.

SO... WAS ADAM AND EVE NOT THE 1ST MADE MAN AND WOMAN?

 

[CapitalC]

I see you're being clever but for those that dont get the joke...

WE ARE ALL RELATED

 

[CapitalC]

we are........

I'm sorry i didnt see you beat me to it...

smart guy here...

 

[huey]

a better question is, if they had only 2 sons...wtf had to happen

 

[judahxulu]

i been telling yall for years genesis does not detail the beginning of the physical earth and adam and eve were a specific species. why u think cain had a mark put on him when he was cast off? who would see the mark if all the people that existed were his family? all hummanoid people are not the same. genesis marks A beginning not THE beginning. this is literal and correct translation which gives more insight into a) the serpent- (which is not defined as literal snake in hebrew) that walked on two legs b) the Sons of God mentioned in the so-called O.T. and c) the nephilim. the bible is not at all an adequate translation because nuances like these change the whole perspective of the brooks.

 

[VIBE]

So the Christian bible of today is wrong pretty much, right? So it becomes a false religion and therefore a damnable sentence to hell?

 

[fiat_money]

Well, members of the same species are kind of related to each other by default.

 

[Bully_Pulpit]

i been telling yall for years genesis does not detail the beginning of the physical earth and adam and eve were a specific species. why u think cain had a mark put on him when he was cast off? who would see the mark if all the people that existed were his family? all hummanoid people are not the same. genesis marks A beginning not THE beginning. this is literal and correct translation which gives more insight into a) the serpent- (which is not defined as literal snake in hebrew) that walked on two legs b) the Sons of God mentioned in the so-called O.T. and c) the nephilim. the bible is not at all an adequate translation because nuances like these change the whole perspective of the brooks.

The snake is EA, brotherhood of the snake. He walks on two legs because he is a humanoid.

 

[judahxulu]

The snake is EA, brotherhood of the snake. He walks on two legs because he is a humanoid.

it just might be enki. the serpent in eden is translated as nakash which implies one that deals in divination, interpreting omens, fortune telling and the like. it can also mean the image of a snake or a literal snake but the word most commonly used for this designation is taneen. but yes i agree 100%- the sepent was a hummanoid being. now u got me going back to my collection oof sumerian and akkadian texts to find out this ea/enki connection. you might wanna grab this bok im about tol look it up in. its called "religions of the ancient near east: sumero-akkadian religious texts and ugaritic epics'. i got the original 1955 edition. its very insightful.

 

[judahxulu]

So the Christian bible of today is wrong pretty much, right? So it becomes a false religion and therefore a damnable sentence to hell?

false religion is a redundant phrase and hell is relative to ones perception as he lives and breathes on earth. im not all about fire, brimstone and condemnation. its just about clarity and actually understanding what u are dealing with thoroughly before u make ur personal choice to accept it, reject it or be in a state of ambivalence about it.

 

[judahxulu]

to the t/s. look up the book "the hebraic tongue restored". there are free copies online. read the cosmogony of moses (the last chapter) and u will get a much different understanding of what the book of genesis was in its original form. very different but useful and practical information.

 

[akomax]

it just might be enki. the serpent in eden is translated as nakash which implies one that deals in divination, interpreting omens, fortune telling and the like. it can also mean the image of a snake or a literal snake but the word most commonly used for this designation is taneen. but yes i agree 100%- the sepent was a hummanoid being. now u got me going back to my collection oof sumerian and akkadian texts to find out this ea/enki connection. you might wanna grab this bok im about tol look it up in. its called "religions of the ancient near east: sumero-akkadian religious texts and ugaritic epics'. i got the original 1955 edition. its very insightful.

we don't believe you , you need more people !!

 

[judahxulu]

we don't believe you , you need more people !!

research. youll find it. im not the only or first person to say that by a long shot. but if a talking snake or the elaborate myth that the bible is based on an elaborate myth is more palatable for you then by all means take it how u want. but the information is out there...i never make shit up or talk about things i haven't thoroughly studied.

 

[DRO]

http://www.echoesofenoch.com/t_eden t.pdf

read this, something to think about.

i don’t usually click on links, butthat was a goooooddd read bruh!.. Read it while i was at work.. Preshate that

 

[Bully_Pulpit]

really cause the link aint working for me, somebody up it

 

[Knock_Twice]

yea the link isn't working for me neither

 

[VIBE]

http://www.echoesofenoch.com/T_Eden T.pdf

Read this, something to think about.

Dro, you're cosigning this? (just wondering)

Also, article is about aliens and god.

 

[thatni99ajahmal]

So if Adam and Eve weren't the first..

Wtf happened to the ppl bfo them?? Do they not have a god?? Or are they under a different god??

 

[DRO]

dro, you're cosigning this? (just wondering)

also, article is about aliens and god.

did u read it?.. It isnt talking about aliens per say... Its speaks on the falling angels lyin and decieving saying that they are aliens and they have "another" way other than christ

 

[VIBE]

did u read it?.. It isnt talking about aliens per say... Its speaks on the falling angels lyin and decieving saying that they are aliens and they have "another" way other than christ

Makes no sense as they're all called gods angels etc and not aliens so they can't be falsifying themselves as aliens.