I had to ban Menace...

[Soloman_The_Wise]

you did what you are supposed to do no hate from me...

 

[RuffDraft]

Yeah, it's just a shame because Menace has been here for a good while… people are going to have to be the 'fall guys' at first until they realise though. It's all for the good of the board, but it's difficult when it's someone who obviously loves the I.C. as much as us and from what I've seen; isn't a troll of any sort.

 

[Soloman_The_Wise]

Yeah, it's just a shame because Menace has been here for a good while… people are going to have to be the 'fall guys' at first until they realise though. It's all for the good of the board, but it's difficult when it's someone who obviously loves the I.C. as much as us and from what I've seen; isn't a troll of any sort.

the problem is that their has been a lack of uniformity and some were allowed to get away with stuff due to that and now others keep pushing the boundries. Menace is generally a consistant and respectfull fposter but has fallen into the everyone else is doing it so why not one up them mentality...

 

[_Jay_]

It'll just be a temporary ban. U didn't do anything wrong, don't beat yourself up for it too much.

 

[5th Letter]

wait until posters start complaining. they got away with it for so long its gonna be hard to enforce that rule all of a sudden.

 

[KillaCham]

He hit me up on Twitter and it seems like he understands and is cool with changing it.. but its still a blatant disrespect to the rules. Dude had coochie full blast in his joint lol.

 

The user and all related content has been deleted.

 

[UPTOWN]

i would have messaged him first and asked him to remove it.... then the temporary ban

 

[5th Letter]

there are a lot of posters with pics in their avis and sigs.

a tasteful pic like what connexx has in his sig is cool. but these ass shaking gifs needs to be tone downed imo. what y'all think?

 

[RuffDraft]

Thanks for the replies… it's tough banning someone's account who's been on the I.C. for many years.

Appreciate the feedback Jay and co. and I agree @KillaCham that it was a blatant bombshell aimed at the rules lol it nearly took up the whole screen haha

lol @Jamel I got a conscience!

@Uptown I did begin writing a message to him, but that'd go against what Grouchy instructed of us - any porn, instant ban. So I was just following through with that.

Glad it's only a temporary ban Jay.

@Jamaica, I think I agree… but there'd have to be some clear guidelines for this…

 

[Soloman_The_Wise]

I had to turn off all sigs I have a home office and clients in and out all day I cannot have someone see all that when they walk in or they look at me like I am some kind of perv lol...

 

[grouchygreg]

I agree I don't like ass in the Avis. This is why Illpix also needs to be a forum you "earn" or private. I know it drives traffic but we have to be consistent with rules.

 

[MsSouthern]

I already turned my sigs off because I do not like looking at chicks shaking their tits and ass on my monitor nor do I want a client walking in and seeing all that

Can you just ban their avi privldges? Some posters don't see any harm so maybe do that to get their attention first before they get a temp ban from the site

 

[Toddo]

Guys, I'm hoping to make signatures default off for people that aren't logged in. I know that signatures are very much a part of forum culture, but I really can't understand the mess some people make of them.

From my point of view if you come to the forum for the first time and see those signatures it's a massive turn-off. Once you sign in you see them and can also turn them off so that's fine.

The only argument I can see in having signatures on for guests is on forums where professionals frequent. Often people will give good help/posts in exchange for the ability to post a link to their sites in their signatures. This is cool, but I don't think it applies to the IC and this is a great thing to earn, not get by default.

Anyway, your community so let me know.

 

[Soloman_The_Wise]

Guys, I'm hoping to make signatures default off for people that aren't logged in. I know that signatures are very much a part of forum culture, but I really can't understand the mess some people make of them.

From my point of view if you come to the forum for the first time and see those signatures it's a massive turn-off. Once you sign in you see them and can also turn them off so that's fine.

The only argument I can see in having signatures on for guests is on forums where professionals frequent. Often people will give good help/posts in exchange for the ability to post a link to their sites in their signatures. This is cool, but I don't think it applies to the IC and this is a great thing to earn, not get by default.

Anyway, your community so let me know.

I actually like the rewards system idea if coupled with the certain number post count before creating thread idea. Let people earn their position by participating and not sabotaging. As to the Illbot dopest cyber beast ever...

 

The user and all related content has been deleted.

 

[janklow]

I know that signatures are very much a part of forum culture, but I really can't understand the mess some people make of them.

1000% agreed

 

[_Jay_]

I agree I don't like ass in the Avis. This is why Illpix also needs to be a forum you "earn" or private. I know it drives traffic but we have to be consistent with rules.

Mods...spread the word (in your Rules' threads in your respective forums).

 

[RuffDraft]

I agree I don't like ass in the Avis. This is why Illpix also needs to be a forum you "earn" or private. I know it drives traffic but we have to be consistent with rules.

Mods...spread the word (in your Rules' threads in your respective forums).

Will do...

 

[KillaCham]

I agree I don't like ass in the Avis. This is why Illpix also needs to be a forum you "earn" or private. I know it drives traffic but we have to be consistent with rules.

Mods...spread the word (in your Rules' threads in your respective forums).

What about asses in signatures?