Westie;9065365 said:
Plutarch;9065321 said:
5th Letter;9065297 said:
No one knows the truth, IF he molested her brother then her reaction is warranted, until more information is released I can't automatically take her word for it I need more solid evidence.
Really? I disagree. Do you think that there are any more productive ways to handle that situation?
5th Letter;9065297 said:
Someone in this thread is taking her word for it because to that person her word is all that matters. This person is known for taking the word of someone without evidence....
Seems like it
might be the case. If so, then that shit is weird, so irrational.
Pointing out she accused him of molesting her brother is irrational how? She said it. Explain please.
This is a smart-ass/rhetorical question, right? No diss, I just can't tell. I'll just treat it as an honest one to be safe.
If you're merely pointing out that she accused him of molesting her brother, then obviously, that is not irrational; that is perceptive.
You and I know, or at least I think you know, that that wasn't what I referring to. As I said before, it
seemed that you were giving too much credit to the mere words of the "victim," without any corroborating evidence. I consider that to be jumping the gun and therefore irrational.
If you're not doing this, however, then obviously, the aforementioned point aïbout being irrational doesn't apply to you.