Female punches,spits n damages her grandpa(?) car #hoh

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
CashmoneyDux;9065322 said:
5th Letter;9065297 said:
No one knows the truth, IF he molested her brother then her reaction is warranted, until more information is released I can't automatically take her word for it I need more solid evidence. Someone in this thread is taking her word for it because to that person her word is all that matters. This person is known for taking the word of someone without evidence....

@Westie

Fight your own battles sweetie.
 
If he molested sum1 why not call police? Instead of swinging on a 6'5 guy

Reason i dont believe her is bcuz she was swinging on him until he slapped her m she tried to play victim n tell ppl to record(not knowing they been the whole time)

Lol at that fat dyke tryna cape
 
Damn, he guy created a WWE finisher when he had her tapping the ground. I don't know a fancy name to call a knee to someone's back.
 
Plutarch;9065321 said:
5th Letter;9065297 said:
No one knows the truth, IF he molested her brother then her reaction is warranted, until more information is released I can't automatically take her word for it I need more solid evidence.

Really? I disagree. Do you think that there are any more productive ways to handle that situation?

5th Letter;9065297 said:
Someone in this thread is taking her word for it because to that person her word is all that matters. This person is known for taking the word of someone without evidence....

Seems like it might be the case. If so, then that shit is weird, so irrational.

Pointing out she accused him of molesting her brother is irrational how? She said it. Explain please.
 
Plutarch;9065321 said:
5th Letter;9065297 said:
No one knows the truth, IF he molested her brother then her reaction is warranted, until more information is released I can't automatically take her word for it I need more solid evidence.

Really? I disagree. Do you think that there are any more productive ways to handle that situation?

5th Letter;9065297 said:
Someone in this thread is taking her word for it because to that person her word is all that matters. This person is known for taking the word of someone without evidence....

Seems like it might be the case. If so, then that shit is weird, so irrational.

She's emotional and yes there's a better way to handle it, but if her claim is true then it's understandable.
 
Westie;9065323 said:
5th Letter;9065297 said:
No one knows the truth, IF he molested her brother then her reaction is warranted, until more information is released I can't automatically take her word for it I need more solid evidence. Someone in this thread is taking her word for it because to that person her word is all that matters. This person is known for taking the word of someone without evidence....

At least @ someone. I know you're not scared right?

Also its more than 1 person...

What evidence would you like in a child molestation case? Last I checked I'm not sentencing this person, all I did was point out she said it so....what's the problem?

I'm just fucking with you. All I'm saying is that just because she said it, doesn't make it true. I mean was he charged? Did the boy confess, do they have any visual evidence?

 
Westie;9065365 said:
Plutarch;9065321 said:
5th Letter;9065297 said:
No one knows the truth, IF he molested her brother then her reaction is warranted, until more information is released I can't automatically take her word for it I need more solid evidence.

Really? I disagree. Do you think that there are any more productive ways to handle that situation?

5th Letter;9065297 said:
Someone in this thread is taking her word for it because to that person her word is all that matters. This person is known for taking the word of someone without evidence....

Seems like it might be the case. If so, then that shit is weird, so irrational.

Pointing out she accused him of molesting her brother is irrational how? She said it. Explain please.

This is a smart-ass/rhetorical question, right? No diss, I just can't tell. I'll just treat it as an honest one to be safe.

If you're merely pointing out that she accused him of molesting her brother, then obviously, that is not irrational; that is perceptive.

You and I know, or at least I think you know, that that wasn't what I referring to. As I said before, it seemed that you were giving too much credit to the mere words of the "victim," without any corroborating evidence. I consider that to be jumping the gun and therefore irrational.

If you're not doing this, however, then obviously, the aforementioned point about being irrational doesn't apply to you.
 
Plutarch;9065321 said:
Really? I disagree. Do you think that there are any more productive ways to handle that situation?

No. Anyone who can look a child in the eyes and do that shit to them deserves to have their skull caved in. That is, imo, the only way to productively deal with pedophiles. But that is not what happens when dealt with "productively" because there are a shitload of pedophiles all up and down this society and they protect each other. When they need to start being put to death immediately.
 
Plutarch;9065428 said:
^^^ oh yeah, I think it was that quote that made me say what I said. That is irrational and ridiculous.

Exactly. But not arguing with an idiot makes automatically makes me a molester sympathizer and I hate women.
 
Will Munny;9065421 said:
Westie;9064734 said:
So y'all relating to a molester...cool.

Well she said it so obviously that makes it true....

Yeah maybe she was just that mad because he took her parking spot.

Lucky this is the IC not a court of law and we're not beholden to anything besides our own opinions, assumptions and observations.

Her opening statement... before she even knew she was being filmed was "you molested him" yet somehow it's easier to believe that she was lying just and just felt like randomly fucking her grandfather up that day?

If that was anyone else but a black woman she would have gotten the benefit of the doubt given the scenario.
 
BiblicalAtheist ;9065446 said:
Plutarch;9065321 said:
Really? I disagree. Do you think that there are any more productive ways to handle that situation?

No. Anyone who can look a child in the eyes and do that shit to them deserves to have their skull caved in. That is, imo, the only way to productively deal with pedophiles. But that is not what happens when dealt with "productively" because there are a shitload of pedophiles all up and down this society and they protect each other. When they need to start being put to death immediately.

I agree and disagree. It's fundamentally problematic that we can't depend on the justice system. But then again, I don't advocate mob rule because that can be just as bad.

And I don't advocate any form of death penalty. But if someone happened to kill a pedophile in self-defense, then I'd have less than zero problems with it.
 
Plutarch;9065473 said:
BiblicalAtheist ;9065446 said:
Plutarch;9065321 said:
Really? I disagree. Do you think that there are any more productive ways to handle that situation?

No. Anyone who can look a child in the eyes and do that shit to them deserves to have their skull caved in. That is, imo, the only way to productively deal with pedophiles. But that is not what happens when dealt with "productively" because there are a shitload of pedophiles all up and down this society and they protect each other. When they need to start being put to death immediately.

I agree and disagree. It's fundamentally problematic that we can't depend on the justice system. But then again, I don't advocate mob rule because that can be just as bad.

And I don't advocate any form of death penalty. But if someone happened to kill a pedophile in self-defense, then I'd have less than zero problems with it.

It's not mob rule to murder someone *when one of your own defile a child. That's justice.
 
Last edited:
CashmoneyDux;9065450 said:
Plutarch;9065428 said:
^^^ oh yeah, I think it was that quote that made me say what I said. That is irrational and ridiculous.

Exactly. But not arguing with an idiot makes automatically makes me a molester sympathizer and I hate women.

You're the one who posted to me specifically and very rudely. And you keep mentioning it. If I'm idiotic shake your head and move on bruh.
 
I thought she was full of shit too and trying to get some sympathy, but Westie is right about her yelling "You molested him" at 14 seconds BEFORE the spectators were even in the picture. It is quite possible, however, that you'd find somebody getting their ass whooped and property destroyed in a public parking lot while their attacker shouts "you molested him" if there was no basis or merit to those claims.

kobe-bryant-face.jpg
 
Will Munny;9065421 said:
Westie;9064734 said:
So y'all relating to a molester...cool.

Well she said it so obviously that makes it true....

I meant to write possible. But either way, you're willing to give him the benefit of the doubt in your opionion? That's your right.

Just curious as to why someone would lie to the person they're accusing directly?
 
obnoxiouslyfresh;9065524 said:
I thought she was full of shit too and trying to get some sympathy, but Westie is right about her yelling "You molested him" at 14 seconds BEFORE the spectators were even in the picture. It is quite possible, however, that you'd find somebody getting their ass whooped and property destroyed in a public parking lot while their attacker shouts "you molested him" if there was no basis or merit to those claims.

kobe-bryant-face.jpg

She was already out of hand before the cameras started rolling
 
Plutarch;9065405 said:
Westie;9065365 said:
Plutarch;9065321 said:
5th Letter;9065297 said:
No one knows the truth, IF he molested her brother then her reaction is warranted, until more information is released I can't automatically take her word for it I need more solid evidence.

Really? I disagree. Do you think that there are any more productive ways to handle that situation?

5th Letter;9065297 said:
Someone in this thread is taking her word for it because to that person her word is all that matters. This person is known for taking the word of someone without evidence....

Seems like it might be the case. If so, then that shit is weird, so irrational.

Pointing out she accused him of molesting her brother is irrational how? She said it. Explain please.

This is a smart-ass/rhetorical question, right? No diss, I just can't tell. I'll just treat it as an honest one to be safe.

If you're merely pointing out that she accused him of molesting her brother, then obviously, that is not irrational; that is perceptive.

You and I know, or at least I think you know, that that wasn't what I referring to. As I said before, it seemed that you were giving too much credit to the mere words of the "victim," without any corroborating evidence. I consider that to be jumping the gun and therefore irrational.

If you're not doing this, however, then obviously, the aforementioned point aïbout being irrational doesn't apply to you.

I didn't say he did or he didn't. I couldn't possibly know that for sure. I just think it makes sense she was under the impression that he did, and she acted out of that belief. I didn't even state she was right in the way she handled it. I just wouldn't be quick to take his side if that's the case.

Plutarch;9065428 said:
^^^ oh yeah, I think it was that quote that made me say what I said. That is irrational and ridiculous.

That's a fair statement then.
 
Shizlansky;9065539 said:
obnoxiouslyfresh;9065524 said:
I thought she was full of shit too and trying to get some sympathy, but Westie is right about her yelling "You molested him" at 14 seconds BEFORE the spectators were even in the picture. It is quite possible, however, that you'd find somebody getting their ass whooped and property destroyed in a public parking lot while their attacker shouts "you molested him" if there was no basis or merit to those claims.

kobe-bryant-face.jpg

She was already out of hand before the cameras started rolling

She beyond out of hand. But, she also consistent. When the video starts, she's yelling "You molested him". When the video is ending, she is yelling "You molested him." She's pretty clear about why she attacking him, and I aint even saying that's alright. I'm saying that she said that shit to his face before the group of spectators came to see the show, then said it AGAIN repeatedly in FRONT of them. And he didn't call her a liar once.
 

Members online

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
167
Views
0
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…