Female politician proposes law to fine men $100 every time they jack off

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date
BiblicalAtheist ;c-9684472 said:
"an act against and uborn child"

Sperm can make it's own babies now?

you are really dumb aren't you? the point, you simple cunt is that if they want to consider female eggs as life and hence restrict shit like birth control, sperm can be considered life as well. since the sperm can go on to make a zygote, that quote is referring to the sperm's future potential, just like the way female eggs are referred to and they call things like the morning after pill an abortion pill when it is nothing of the sort since it simply halts fertilization. you might wanna employ a lil critical thinking in the future cuz your dumbass thoughts aren't clever or insightful. them mcdonald's fumes must have really fried your brain over the years huh

oh and @"BiblicalAtheist "

 
Ajackson17;c-9684719 said:
There will be a civil war in this country if this would be law.

She knows the law won't get passed but simply proposing it will get her agenda attention and free press
 
30464972.jpg


 
Trillfate;c-9684732 said:
Ajackson17;c-9684719 said:
There will be a civil war in this country if this would be law.

She knows the law won't get passed but simply proposing it will get her agenda attention and free press

yeah, if the agenda is to expose male hypocrisy when it comes to their desire to legislatively control women's bodies

 
Shit like this is why I can't take these feminists seriously. I get that she's not serious with this bill. She's just trying to make a point. And if this is in response to things like restrictions on birth control then I guess it's fair to some extent, but still a waste of tax payer money. But the fact that she's referencing "Man's right to know" and the article said that this is particularly in response to abortion leads me to believe that this is largely attacking the idea that a man deserves to know if a chick is trying to abort his child.

Why do feminists not think that's information that should be shared? Even if the decision is hers at the end of the day, how can feminists not see that it's foul to make that kind of decision without even telling the man? Even worse, these feminist act like its offensive for someone to even make that suggestion.
 
The Lonious Monk;c-9687508 said:
Shit like this is why I can't take these feminists seriously. I get that she's not serious with this bill. She's just trying to make a point. And if this is in response to things like restrictions on birth control then I guess it's fair to some extent, but still a waste of tax payer money. But the fact that she's referencing "Man's right to know" and the article said that this is particularly in response to abortion leads me to believe that this is largely attacking the idea that a man deserves to know if a chick is trying to abort his child.

Why do feminists not think that's information that should be shared? Even if the decision is hers at the end of the day, how can feminists not see that it's foul to make that kind of decision without even telling the man? Even worse, these feminist act like its offensive for someone to even make that suggestion.

Her body her decision respect her agency pig!!!
 
Trolling to the highest order, but I wouldn't be surprised if in three years, some fuckin Christian wanna-be do-gooder tries to ban condoms saying "condoms are murder" or some silly shit like that.

That shit is on the way, watch.....
 

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
32
Views
71
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…