Celtics trying to get Nate Robinson?

  • Thread starter Thread starter New Editor
  • Start date Start date

Rated R

New member
In any deal they offer I hope they're giving up Eddie House.

Nate & House don't need to be in the same back court together.
 
Last edited:
Truthfully it kinda pisses me off that the Celtics usually get first dibs on every good player in the league.

If he goes to the Celtic will he still be coming off the bench?

IMO he needs a starting role
 
Last edited:
biggar;85436 said:
Truthfully it kinda pisses me off that the Celtics usually get first dibs on every good player in the league.

If he goes to the Celtic will he still be coming off the bench?

IMO he needs a starting role

Son... what?
 
Last edited:
Nate definitly dont need to be a starter, at least not for a team that wants to win a ring...

only way the Knicks trade Nate is if they can add eddy curry or Jared Jeffries to the deal
 
Last edited:
I don't see the point of getting Nate the Celtics are aight as they are, hes just gonna get low minutes and come off the bench anyway.
 
Last edited:
If the Celtics don't trade us any expiring contracts or Kevin Garnett they can go fuck themselves.
 
Last edited:
c1up;85622 said:
Son... what?

Lol I literally laughed at this. I feel like I could see my nigga's head turn to the side on some "are you serious" shit.
 
Last edited:
c1up;85622 said:
Son... what?

You start him in the 1st and 3rd quarter for the up tempo game, then have a defensive guard for the 2nd and 4th quarters.

What you think he's overratted or not consistent?
 
Last edited:
biggar;88468 said:
You start him in the 1st and 3rd quarter for the up tempo game, then have a defensive guard for the 2nd and 4th quarters.

What you think he's overratted or not consistent?

I think Rondo is better than him.
 
Last edited:
Nate>Rondo if the celtics get nate that shit will be crazy
 
Last edited:
vageneral08;89288 said:
Nate>Rondo if the celtics get nate that shit will be crazy

I'm a Knicks fan,but that shit is so false
 
Last edited:
vageneral08;89288 said:
Nate>Rondo if the celtics get nate that shit will be crazy

Negative, I've watched Nate play his whole career and Rondo has already passed him as a leader and a clutch player. Nate is an 6th man on a great team, that's it. And when this summer comes GOOD RIDDANCE NATE!
 
Last edited:
DatGuyJ22;89322 said:
I'm a Knicks fan,but that shit is so false

Nate is a more exciting player rondo is boring as fuck
 
Last edited:
vageneral08;89393 said:
Nate is a more exciting player rondo is boring as fuck

I'd rather have a boring player who proved he can contribute to chamionship than an exciting player who doen't play defense or have a high basketball IQ...
 
Last edited:
allied;89416 said:
I'd rather have a boring player who proved he can contribute to chamionship than an exciting player who doen't play defense or have a high basketball IQ...

C/S, all Nate does is score and he aint that consistent

Rondo can score, pass, and rebound, and he can play defense
 
Last edited:
Nothing wrong with having 2 different types of guards.

Rondo is better defensively, but I think Nate has more scoring abilities.
 
Last edited:
biggar;88468 said:
You start him in the 1st and 3rd quarter for the up tempo game, then have a defensive guard for the 2nd and 4th quarters.

What you think he's overratted or not consistent?

very..r u actually implyin that he should start over rondo or ray ray...
 
Last edited:
G.R.I.P. Money $$$;89715 said:
very..r u actually implyin that he should start over rondo or ray ray...

I think the most offensive player at the position should start the game, and the defensive player should finish it.

When's the last time Rondo put up 40?
 
Last edited:
biggar;89768 said:
I think the most offensive player at the position should start the game, and the defensive player should finish it.

When's the last time Rondo put up 40?

When is the first time Nate had a triple double? Your not giving Rondo the respect he deserves...
 
Last edited:
biggar;89768 said:
I think the most offensive player at the position should start the game, and the defensive player should finish it.

When's the last time Rondo put up 40?

ion know, but i do know he is great at runnin dat team, nate hasnt even proven he can be a great 6th man, let alone be a solid starting pg....starting nate would just be exactly like having eddie house in the starting line up...
 
Last edited:

Members online

No members online now.

Trending content

Thread statistics

Created
-,
Last reply from
-,
Replies
27
Views
13
Back
Top
Menu
Your profile
Post thread…