CB: I'm saying Miami can be a dynasty with or without Oden. If he can play, they'll be unstoppable. Your contention that they won't be as good defensively with a lumbering big like Oden is ridiculous. During the regular season, when they started Dampier and Ilgauskas, they had one of the top three defenses in the league. Their great D didn't begin in the playoffs. And -- I meant to mention this earlier -- Haslem is far from over-the-hill, as you seem to suggest.
As for OKC, as you know, they may have trouble keeping that team together financially. With big money already committed to Durant and Kendrick Perkins for several years, they've got to pay Westbrook, James Harden and Serge Ibaka. I hope they can keep their team together, but that's far from guaranteed. Beyond that, there's the very real question of whether Westbrook will be able to develop into the point guard they need. As we saw in the playoffs, his poor decision-making is detrimental in a tightly contested playoff series. Scott Brooks, a good coach, also raised questions about his ability to lead a team to postseason greatness. His lack of offensive imagination and his club's woeful execution was far from "dynastic." It's a stretch, to say the least, to pick them as a dynasty-in-the-making over Miami.
RB: The Thunder are going to have to make some tough financial decisions, no question. I don't expect they can keep everyone. But they'll be working under the new parameters. Surely you're not saying they'll have a harder time re-signing their guys under the new rules than Miami will have adding guys with a payroll already locked in at $65 million-plus for the next five years. The Thunder also went to the conference finals with their top two stars, Kevin Durant and Russ Westbrook, all of 22 years old. You've given LeBron James eight years to find his game and even though he still isn't complete, you insist he still has time to find a post game and a midrange sweet spot. But you're going to predict Westbrook's flaws, three seasons into his career, will forever hamstring both he and his team? An All-Star who helped lead his team to the conference finals in his third year? You're going to have to explain that one to me, especially considering Westbrook's work ethic is twice that of LeBron's. Then there's Serge Ibaka and James Harden, both 21. Let me repeat: THEY WENT TO THE CONFERENCE FINALS with four main players who aren't old enough to rent a car without mom's signature.
As for the Heat's defense, I couldn't care less what worked for them in the regular season. That's not when dynasties are built. And it's not as if they didn't give Magloire and Big Z a look during the playoffs. They went away from them because they couldn't provide playoff-caliber defense. Suggesting their defense won't be as good playing a lumbering big isn't ridiculous. Unless, of course, you're suggesting their defense in these playoffs would be better if they were playing Damp or Jamaal or Big Z. Now that sounds ridiculous.
CB: First of all, this isn't about Oden. But just to combat your ridiculous claim one last time -- adding a physical 7-footer with natural defensive instincts to the Heat lineup (one who can also finish around the rim) -- would undoubtedly make their defense better. How you can suggest otherwise is head-scratching.
As for OKC, I haven't said Westbrook will never learn the position. I'm just saying it's a huge question mark, a much bigger question mark than any of the Big Three in Miami. And as long as the Thunder lack a legit post scorer, they're going to be vulnerable in the playoffs. At least, Bosh can score in the post to some degree. Also, the Thunder haven't proved to be anything special defensively. Until you see them become formidable on that end, you should cut out the dynasty talk.
thoughts..........................
Last edited: