Black man not guilty of manslaughter in the death of a white teenager thanks to self-defense laws

[wilberdmillz]

Was this even in america?

 

[Matt-]

http://smugtownbeacon.com/news.php?viewStory=420
http://rochester.ynn.com/content/to...t-in-roderick-scott-trial--911-call-released/
http://rochester.ynn.com/content/top_stories/490926/jury-finds-roderick-scott-not-guilty/

 

[tha bause]

Inb4 shitstorm

 

[StillFaggyAF]

white people always get into trouble. good that one was killed

 

[OmegaDon]

This happened in Greece

 

[Ajackson17]

Difference is that teen was not walking to his house and the case made it clear that he was on his way home. These fiends were breaking and entering cars and were spotted doing such. He was not stalking no one and merely checked on his car and dude lunged at him. He should gotten manslaughter charge really, but did the teen had a weapon on him. That's the case.

 

[Ajackson17]

This happened in Greece

Rochester, NY. It was the United States

 

[Kat]

This happened in Greece

Pretty sure that's referencing a town in NY and not the actual country.

 

[Matt-]

This happened in Greece

Thankfully there is an edit button. You should use it so that your first post isn't so stupid.

 

[Matt-]

Difference is that teen was not walking to his house and the case made it clear that he was on his way home. These fiends were breaking and entering cars and were spotted doing such. He was not stalking no one and merely checked on his car and dude lunged at him. He should gotten manslaughter charge really, but did the teen had a weapon on him. That's the case.

the difference in what? please refrain from other comparing it to other trials, especially trials that took place well after this one. And i don't know why you would suggest that its ok to shoot and kill a teenager because you suspect he was breaking into a car or that he refused to allow another man with a gun to apprehend him.

 

[Ajackson17]

Difference is that teen was not walking to his house and the case made it clear that he was on his way home. These fiends were breaking and entering cars and were spotted doing such. He was not stalking no one and merely checked on his car and dude lunged at him. He should gotten manslaughter charge really, but did the teen had a weapon on him. That's the case.

the difference in what? please refrain from other comparing it to other trials, especially trials that took place well after this one. And i don't know why you would suggest that its ok to shoot and kill a teenager because you suspect he was breaking into a car or that he refused to allow another man with a gun to apprehend him.

All, I said if the teenager came with a weapon at him, than he is justified, if he didn't he is not justified and should be convicted of manslaughter. Teenagers make choices, they have to live by them same as adults, that's why they can be charged as adult depending on the crime.

 

[7figz]

This happened in Greece

Thankfully there is an edit button. You should use it so that your first post isn't so stupid.

You could also use that edit button to add the details that led up to his murder.

Anyway, why post this now - did anyone say black people always get convicted ?

 

[Matt-]

Difference is that teen was not walking to his house and the case made it clear that he was on his way home. These fiends were breaking and entering cars and were spotted doing such. He was not stalking no one and merely checked on his car and dude lunged at him. He should gotten manslaughter charge really, but did the teen had a weapon on him. That's the case.

the difference in what? please refrain from other comparing it to other trials, especially trials that took place well after this one. And i don't know why you would suggest that its ok to shoot and kill a teenager because you suspect he was breaking into a car or that he refused to allow another man with a gun to apprehend him.

All, I said if the teenager came with a weapon at him, than he is justified, if he didn't he is not justified and should be convicted of manslaughter. Teenagers make choices, they have to live by them same as adults, that's why they can be charged as adult depending on the crime.

as far as i can tell, he didn't have a weapon.

 

[Matt-]

This happened in Greece

Thankfully there is an edit button. You should use it so that your first post isn't so stupid.

You could also use that edit button to add the details that led up to his murder.

Anyway, why post this now - did anyone say black people always get convicted ?

i thought the articles made clear that the kids were breaking into cars.

i'm posting it now b/c i don't think it got the coverage it deserves. Yes people said things like, "let a black man shoot someone, they go to jail" and several variations of such statements. I'm not going to find exact posts, but yes it was said plenty of times.

 

[Busta Carmichael]

White people stole this country.

almost wiped out the natives

And enslaved africans

And are still enslaving them by giving them a ridicolous sentence for a small crime

You really think anyone gives a shit about a white teen getting shot?

 

[5th Letter]

He should have called the police why even confront them boys.

 

[Matt-]

White people stole this country.

almost wiped out the natives

And enslaved africans

And are still enslaving them by giving them a ridicolous sentence for a small crime

You really think anyone gives a shit about a white teen getting shot?

yeah, they gave a shit about columbine.

 

[Ajackson17]

Difference is that teen was not walking to his house and the case made it clear that he was on his way home. These fiends were breaking and entering cars and were spotted doing such. He was not stalking no one and merely checked on his car and dude lunged at him. He should gotten manslaughter charge really, but did the teen had a weapon on him. That's the case.

the difference in what? please refrain from other comparing it to other trials, especially trials that took place well after this one. And i don't know why you would suggest that its ok to shoot and kill a teenager because you suspect he was breaking into a car or that he refused to allow another man with a gun to apprehend him.

All, I said if the teenager came with a weapon at him, than he is justified, if he didn't he is not justified and should be convicted of manslaughter. Teenagers make choices, they have to live by them same as adults, that's why they can be charged as adult depending on the crime.

as far as i can tell, he didn't have a weapon.

Then he needs to go to jail. Not enough for self defense.

 

[Ajackson17]

White people stole this country.

almost wiped out the natives

And enslaved africans

And are still enslaving them by giving them a ridicolous sentence for a small crime

You really think anyone gives a shit about a white teen getting shot?

yeah, they gave a shit about columbine.

And the Sandy Hook massacre as well, you had black folks crying tears and you had these same hardcore IC dudes, getting mad if there was any tiny hint of a joke. People were getting banned left and right and the masses were all for it. Don't let these negroes lie to you @matt

 

[Busta Carmichael]

White people stole this country.

almost wiped out the natives

And enslaved africans

And are still enslaving them by giving them a ridicolous sentence for a small crime

You really think anyone gives a shit about a white teen getting shot?

yeah, they gave a shit about columbine.

I'm talking about black people giving a shit.

And since this site is majority black, your thread was directed at us in counter argument to the zimmerman verdict. Am I right or correct?